稳定泥沙长期抗拉抗压强度控制参数

Q3 Engineering
W. Teixeira, Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino, R. Izzo
{"title":"稳定泥沙长期抗拉抗压强度控制参数","authors":"W. Teixeira, Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino, R. Izzo","doi":"10.28991/cej-2023-09-04-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The yellow-layer soils of the Guabirotuba formation in Brazil are problematic due to their expansive nature and low-bearing capacity. There has been little exploration into stabilizing these soils using a calcium-based binder. In addition, existing methods for dosing lime to fine and coarse-grained soils using the porosity-to-lime index (η/Liv) have primarily focused on non-optimal compaction conditions to determine the split tensile and compressive strengths and empirical relationships between both tests while ignoring the study of optimal lime-soil mixes compaction conditions. Therefore, the objective of this research is to examine the unconfined compressive (qu) and split tensile (qt) behavior of a traditional Guabirotuba yellow silt stabilized with dolomitic hydrated lime (L) under standard, intermediate, and modified effort conditions and the correlation between qu and qt. The lime-soil blends were cured for up to 180 days, and 3-9% lime percentages were used under optimum compaction conditions (maximum dry density and optimum water content). The porosity/lime index (η/Liv), a semi-empirical index, was utilized to investigate the evolution of qu and qt over the short and long term. η/Livvaried between 6-25% by volume. Furthermore, the qt/qu index was calculated to be between 0.12-0.20, depending on the curing time, independent of lime addition and compaction effort used. Equations well-suited to a power function dosing qt and qu based on curing time and η/Livindex was proposed. Finally, some dosages of soil-lime mixtures were proposed for possible applications in geotechnical engineering, applying the porosity and volumetric binder index in optimal compaction conditions, which had not been applied before for lime-improved soils. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-04-03 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":53612,"journal":{"name":"Open Civil Engineering Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control Parameters for the Long-Term Tensile and Compressive Strength of Stabilized Sedimentary Silt\",\"authors\":\"W. Teixeira, Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino, R. Izzo\",\"doi\":\"10.28991/cej-2023-09-04-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The yellow-layer soils of the Guabirotuba formation in Brazil are problematic due to their expansive nature and low-bearing capacity. There has been little exploration into stabilizing these soils using a calcium-based binder. In addition, existing methods for dosing lime to fine and coarse-grained soils using the porosity-to-lime index (η/Liv) have primarily focused on non-optimal compaction conditions to determine the split tensile and compressive strengths and empirical relationships between both tests while ignoring the study of optimal lime-soil mixes compaction conditions. Therefore, the objective of this research is to examine the unconfined compressive (qu) and split tensile (qt) behavior of a traditional Guabirotuba yellow silt stabilized with dolomitic hydrated lime (L) under standard, intermediate, and modified effort conditions and the correlation between qu and qt. The lime-soil blends were cured for up to 180 days, and 3-9% lime percentages were used under optimum compaction conditions (maximum dry density and optimum water content). The porosity/lime index (η/Liv), a semi-empirical index, was utilized to investigate the evolution of qu and qt over the short and long term. η/Livvaried between 6-25% by volume. Furthermore, the qt/qu index was calculated to be between 0.12-0.20, depending on the curing time, independent of lime addition and compaction effort used. Equations well-suited to a power function dosing qt and qu based on curing time and η/Livindex was proposed. Finally, some dosages of soil-lime mixtures were proposed for possible applications in geotechnical engineering, applying the porosity and volumetric binder index in optimal compaction conditions, which had not been applied before for lime-improved soils. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-04-03 Full Text: PDF\",\"PeriodicalId\":53612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Civil Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Civil Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2023-09-04-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2023-09-04-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴西Guabirotuba地层的黄层土壤由于其膨胀性和低承载能力而存在问题。使用钙基粘合剂稳定这些土壤的探索很少。此外,利用孔隙度-石灰指数(η/Liv)向细粒和粗粒土添加石灰的现有方法主要集中在非最佳压实条件上,以确定劈裂抗拉强度和抗压强度以及两者之间的经验关系,而忽略了对最佳石灰-土混合物压实条件的研究。因此,本研究的目的是研究传统瓜比罗图巴黄色淤泥在标准、中等和改进的努力条件下的无侧限压缩(qu)和分裂拉伸(qt)行为,以及qu和qt之间的相关性。石灰-土壤混合物固化长达180天,在最佳压实条件下使用3-9%的石灰百分比(最大干密度和最佳含水量)。利用孔隙度/石灰指数(η/Liv)这一半经验指数,研究了短期和长期内qu和qt的演变。η/ livv在6-25%之间变化。此外,qt/qu指数计算为0.12-0.20之间,取决于养护时间,独立于石灰添加和使用的压实努力。提出了基于固化时间和η/Livindex的幂函数加药qt和qu方程。最后,根据最佳压实条件下的孔隙率和体积粘结剂指数,提出了一些土-石灰混合料在岩土工程中的可能应用剂量,这在石灰改良土中尚未得到应用。Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-04-03全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Control Parameters for the Long-Term Tensile and Compressive Strength of Stabilized Sedimentary Silt
The yellow-layer soils of the Guabirotuba formation in Brazil are problematic due to their expansive nature and low-bearing capacity. There has been little exploration into stabilizing these soils using a calcium-based binder. In addition, existing methods for dosing lime to fine and coarse-grained soils using the porosity-to-lime index (η/Liv) have primarily focused on non-optimal compaction conditions to determine the split tensile and compressive strengths and empirical relationships between both tests while ignoring the study of optimal lime-soil mixes compaction conditions. Therefore, the objective of this research is to examine the unconfined compressive (qu) and split tensile (qt) behavior of a traditional Guabirotuba yellow silt stabilized with dolomitic hydrated lime (L) under standard, intermediate, and modified effort conditions and the correlation between qu and qt. The lime-soil blends were cured for up to 180 days, and 3-9% lime percentages were used under optimum compaction conditions (maximum dry density and optimum water content). The porosity/lime index (η/Liv), a semi-empirical index, was utilized to investigate the evolution of qu and qt over the short and long term. η/Livvaried between 6-25% by volume. Furthermore, the qt/qu index was calculated to be between 0.12-0.20, depending on the curing time, independent of lime addition and compaction effort used. Equations well-suited to a power function dosing qt and qu based on curing time and η/Livindex was proposed. Finally, some dosages of soil-lime mixtures were proposed for possible applications in geotechnical engineering, applying the porosity and volumetric binder index in optimal compaction conditions, which had not been applied before for lime-improved soils. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-04-03 Full Text: PDF
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Civil Engineering Journal
Open Civil Engineering Journal Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Civil Engineering Journal is an Open Access online journal which publishes research, reviews/mini-reviews, letter articles and guest edited single topic issues in all areas of civil engineering. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in civil engineering. The topics covered in the journal include (but not limited to) concrete structures, construction materials, structural mechanics, soil mechanics, foundation engineering, offshore geotechnics, water resources, hydraulics, horology, coastal engineering, river engineering, ocean modeling, fluid-solid-structure interactions, offshore engineering, marine structures, constructional management and other civil engineering relevant areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信