早期心脏康复治疗对急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心功能和运动耐力的影响

Caixia Jiang, Jiewen Guo
{"title":"早期心脏康复治疗对急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心功能和运动耐力的影响","authors":"Caixia Jiang, Jiewen Guo","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN211501-20191028-03081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate early cardiac rehabilitation program on short term and long term effect of patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 98 acute myocardial infarction patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assiged to the study group (n=49) and the control group (n=49). Participants in the control group received exercise training, while the study group carried out early cardiac rehabilitation program. The cardiac function, activity of daily living and exercise endurance were compared in both groups before and 1 week after intervention, in addition, the patient`s quality of life and the incidence of adverse cardiac events were also compared before and 6 months after intervention. \n \n \nResults \nAfter 1 week of intervention, the value of LVEF, LVDD, scores of activity of daily living and 6MWT were (56.74 ± 8.92)%, (49.29 ± 5.09)mm, (76.00 ± 5.95) and (378.12 ± 48.54)m in the study group, those index were (52.10 ± 7.44)%, (48.47 ± 4.04)mm, (72.93 ± 6.51), (355.69 ± 46.36)m in the control group, the LVEF, scores of activity of daily living and 6MWT were significantly increased in the study group compared to the control group (t=0.878-2.792, P<0.05). After 6 months of intervention, the scores physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social function, role-emotional, mental health were [(75.14 ± 12.15), (56.38 ± 7.65), (68.79 ± 6.65), (68.48 ± 10.91), (80.82 ± 7.12), (66.44 ± 9.61), (77.75 ± 13.05), (77.07 ± 8.46)] and [(72.70 ± 10.97), (52.05 ± 5.61), (62.07 ± 5.51), (65.76 ± 8.45), (78.33 ± 8.71), (65.20 ± 6.84), (72.53 ± 9.66), (75.49 ± 5.76)] in the study group and control group, respectively. The scores of role-physical, bodily pain, role-emotional were significantly increased in the study group compared to the control group (t=2.248-3.448, P<0.05). The study group showed lower incidence of angina and arrhythmia compared to the control group (4.08% and 6.12% vs 16.33% and 20.41%), the differences had statistical significance (χ2=4.009 and 4.346, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nEarly cardiac rehabilitation program improve the cardiac function and exercise endurance in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention, reduce the the incidence of adverse cardiac events and improved patients` quality of life. \n \n \nKey words: \nCardiac rehabilitation; Aacute myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Cardiac function; Quality of life","PeriodicalId":22999,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practical nursing","volume":"46 1","pages":"818-823"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of early cardiac rehabilitation program on cardiac function and exercise endurance in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention\",\"authors\":\"Caixia Jiang, Jiewen Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.CN211501-20191028-03081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate early cardiac rehabilitation program on short term and long term effect of patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA total of 98 acute myocardial infarction patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assiged to the study group (n=49) and the control group (n=49). Participants in the control group received exercise training, while the study group carried out early cardiac rehabilitation program. The cardiac function, activity of daily living and exercise endurance were compared in both groups before and 1 week after intervention, in addition, the patient`s quality of life and the incidence of adverse cardiac events were also compared before and 6 months after intervention. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAfter 1 week of intervention, the value of LVEF, LVDD, scores of activity of daily living and 6MWT were (56.74 ± 8.92)%, (49.29 ± 5.09)mm, (76.00 ± 5.95) and (378.12 ± 48.54)m in the study group, those index were (52.10 ± 7.44)%, (48.47 ± 4.04)mm, (72.93 ± 6.51), (355.69 ± 46.36)m in the control group, the LVEF, scores of activity of daily living and 6MWT were significantly increased in the study group compared to the control group (t=0.878-2.792, P<0.05). After 6 months of intervention, the scores physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social function, role-emotional, mental health were [(75.14 ± 12.15), (56.38 ± 7.65), (68.79 ± 6.65), (68.48 ± 10.91), (80.82 ± 7.12), (66.44 ± 9.61), (77.75 ± 13.05), (77.07 ± 8.46)] and [(72.70 ± 10.97), (52.05 ± 5.61), (62.07 ± 5.51), (65.76 ± 8.45), (78.33 ± 8.71), (65.20 ± 6.84), (72.53 ± 9.66), (75.49 ± 5.76)] in the study group and control group, respectively. The scores of role-physical, bodily pain, role-emotional were significantly increased in the study group compared to the control group (t=2.248-3.448, P<0.05). The study group showed lower incidence of angina and arrhythmia compared to the control group (4.08% and 6.12% vs 16.33% and 20.41%), the differences had statistical significance (χ2=4.009 and 4.346, P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nEarly cardiac rehabilitation program improve the cardiac function and exercise endurance in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention, reduce the the incidence of adverse cardiac events and improved patients` quality of life. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nCardiac rehabilitation; Aacute myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Cardiac function; Quality of life\",\"PeriodicalId\":22999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of practical nursing\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"818-823\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of practical nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN211501-20191028-03081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practical nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN211501-20191028-03081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨早期心脏康复方案对急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的近期和远期疗效。方法98例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者随机分为研究组(n=49)和对照组(n=49)。对照组的参与者接受运动训练,而研究组进行早期心脏康复计划。比较两组患者干预前和干预后1周的心功能、日常生活活动、运动耐力,并比较干预前和干预后6个月患者的生活质量和心脏不良事件发生率。结果经过1周的干预,LVEF的价值,LVDD,大量的日常生活活动和6 mwt(56.74±8.92)%,mm(49.29±5.09),(76.00±5.95)和(378.12±48.54)m组的研究中,这些指数(52.10±7.44)%,mm(48.47±4.04),(72.93±6.51),(355.69±46.36)米在对照组,LVEF,大量活动的日常生活和6 mwt显著增加在研究小组比对照组(t = 0.878 ~ -2.792, P < 0.05)。经过6个月的干预,分数身体功能、role-physical,身体疼痛,一般健康、活力、社会功能、情绪、心理健康是[(75.14±12.15),(56.38±7.65),(68.79±6.65),(68.48±10.91),(80.82±7.12),(66.44±9.61),(77.75±13.05),(77.07±8.46)]和[(72.70±10.97),(52.05±5.61),(62.07±5.51),(65.76±8.45),(78.33±8.71),(65.20±6.84),(72.53±9.66),(75.49±5.76)]在研究组和对照组,分别。研究组的角色-身体、身体疼痛、角色-情绪得分显著高于对照组(t=2.248 ~ 3.448, P<0.05)。研究组心绞痛、心律失常发生率低于对照组(分别为4.08%、6.12% vs 16.33%、20.41%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.009、4.346,P<0.05)。结论早期心脏康复方案可改善急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的心功能和运动耐力,降低心脏不良事件的发生率,提高患者的生活质量。关键词:心脏康复;急性心肌梗死;经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;心脏功能;生活质量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of early cardiac rehabilitation program on cardiac function and exercise endurance in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention
Objective To investigate early cardiac rehabilitation program on short term and long term effect of patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods A total of 98 acute myocardial infarction patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assiged to the study group (n=49) and the control group (n=49). Participants in the control group received exercise training, while the study group carried out early cardiac rehabilitation program. The cardiac function, activity of daily living and exercise endurance were compared in both groups before and 1 week after intervention, in addition, the patient`s quality of life and the incidence of adverse cardiac events were also compared before and 6 months after intervention. Results After 1 week of intervention, the value of LVEF, LVDD, scores of activity of daily living and 6MWT were (56.74 ± 8.92)%, (49.29 ± 5.09)mm, (76.00 ± 5.95) and (378.12 ± 48.54)m in the study group, those index were (52.10 ± 7.44)%, (48.47 ± 4.04)mm, (72.93 ± 6.51), (355.69 ± 46.36)m in the control group, the LVEF, scores of activity of daily living and 6MWT were significantly increased in the study group compared to the control group (t=0.878-2.792, P<0.05). After 6 months of intervention, the scores physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social function, role-emotional, mental health were [(75.14 ± 12.15), (56.38 ± 7.65), (68.79 ± 6.65), (68.48 ± 10.91), (80.82 ± 7.12), (66.44 ± 9.61), (77.75 ± 13.05), (77.07 ± 8.46)] and [(72.70 ± 10.97), (52.05 ± 5.61), (62.07 ± 5.51), (65.76 ± 8.45), (78.33 ± 8.71), (65.20 ± 6.84), (72.53 ± 9.66), (75.49 ± 5.76)] in the study group and control group, respectively. The scores of role-physical, bodily pain, role-emotional were significantly increased in the study group compared to the control group (t=2.248-3.448, P<0.05). The study group showed lower incidence of angina and arrhythmia compared to the control group (4.08% and 6.12% vs 16.33% and 20.41%), the differences had statistical significance (χ2=4.009 and 4.346, P<0.05). Conclusion Early cardiac rehabilitation program improve the cardiac function and exercise endurance in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention, reduce the the incidence of adverse cardiac events and improved patients` quality of life. Key words: Cardiac rehabilitation; Aacute myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Cardiac function; Quality of life
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信