体外受精治疗的自然周期方案:临床结果

Jesús Pedro Iglesias , Alfonso Bermejo , Inés Carreño , Bárbara Castro , Laura Seco , Ruth Vázquez
{"title":"体外受精治疗的自然周期方案:临床结果","authors":"Jesús Pedro Iglesias ,&nbsp;Alfonso Bermejo ,&nbsp;Inés Carreño ,&nbsp;Bárbara Castro ,&nbsp;Laura Seco ,&nbsp;Ruth Vázquez","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2017.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles that take advantage of the natural cycle (NC) of the patient have become an alternative to the protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), and are a cheaper and easier option. Our objective is to analyse the clinical and laboratory results obtained in our centre on 287 cycles performed in pure natural cycles.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was carried out on 287 natural cycles performed in our centre between September 2013 and May 2016.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 287 cycles were performed on 108 patients with a mean age of 40.7 years, a mean FSH of 12.2 mU/mL, and 1.5 previous cycles of unsuccessfully performed IVF. Egg retrieval (ER) was achieved in 194 cycles (67.6%), with a mean of 1.1 oocytes by (ER), and a fertilisation rate of 69.6%. Embryo transfer was achieved in 70 of the 287 cycles (24.4%) with an implantation rate of 23.7%. Analysed globally, the pregnancy rate was 6.97% per cycle started, 10.3% per ER, 28.6% per transfer, and 18.5% per patient.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>A high percentage of IVF cycles performed in natural cycle are cancelled without reaching embryo transfer. However, analysing the results obtained by ER and transfer, they are an alternative, simple, economical, and slightly aggressive, with acceptable results if we consider their frequent indication in a population of poor prognosis, where more aggressive options do not improve the expectations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medre.2017.06.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocolo de ciclo natural para tratamientos de FIV: resultados clínicos\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Pedro Iglesias ,&nbsp;Alfonso Bermejo ,&nbsp;Inés Carreño ,&nbsp;Bárbara Castro ,&nbsp;Laura Seco ,&nbsp;Ruth Vázquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medre.2017.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles that take advantage of the natural cycle (NC) of the patient have become an alternative to the protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), and are a cheaper and easier option. Our objective is to analyse the clinical and laboratory results obtained in our centre on 287 cycles performed in pure natural cycles.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was carried out on 287 natural cycles performed in our centre between September 2013 and May 2016.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 287 cycles were performed on 108 patients with a mean age of 40.7 years, a mean FSH of 12.2 mU/mL, and 1.5 previous cycles of unsuccessfully performed IVF. Egg retrieval (ER) was achieved in 194 cycles (67.6%), with a mean of 1.1 oocytes by (ER), and a fertilisation rate of 69.6%. Embryo transfer was achieved in 70 of the 287 cycles (24.4%) with an implantation rate of 23.7%. Analysed globally, the pregnancy rate was 6.97% per cycle started, 10.3% per ER, 28.6% per transfer, and 18.5% per patient.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>A high percentage of IVF cycles performed in natural cycle are cancelled without reaching embryo transfer. However, analysing the results obtained by ER and transfer, they are an alternative, simple, economical, and slightly aggressive, with acceptable results if we consider their frequent indication in a population of poor prognosis, where more aggressive options do not improve the expectations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 79-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medre.2017.06.003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932017300257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932017300257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用患者自然周期(NC)的体外受精(IVF)周期已经成为控制卵巢刺激(COS)方案的替代方案,并且是一种更便宜和更容易的选择。我们的目标是分析我们中心287个纯天然周期的临床和实验室结果。材料与方法对2013年9月至2016年5月在我中心进行的287次自然循环进行回顾性分析。结果108例患者共行287个周期,平均年龄40.7岁,平均FSH 12.2 mU/mL,既往IVF失败1.5个周期。194个周期(67.6%)实现取卵(ER),平均取卵1.1个,受精率为69.6%。287个周期中有70个(24.4%)实现了胚胎移植,着床率为23.7%。在全球范围内分析,每个周期开始的妊娠率为6.97%,每个ER为10.3%,每个转移为28.6%,每个患者为18.5%。在自然周期中进行的试管婴儿周期中,有很大一部分在没有达到胚胎移植的情况下被取消。然而,分析ER和转移获得的结果,如果我们考虑到它们在预后差的人群中的频繁适应症,则它们是一种替代方法,简单,经济,并且稍微激进,结果可接受,在这些人群中,更激进的选择并不能改善预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protocolo de ciclo natural para tratamientos de FIV: resultados clínicos

Introduction

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles that take advantage of the natural cycle (NC) of the patient have become an alternative to the protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), and are a cheaper and easier option. Our objective is to analyse the clinical and laboratory results obtained in our centre on 287 cycles performed in pure natural cycles.

Material and methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out on 287 natural cycles performed in our centre between September 2013 and May 2016.

Results

A total of 287 cycles were performed on 108 patients with a mean age of 40.7 years, a mean FSH of 12.2 mU/mL, and 1.5 previous cycles of unsuccessfully performed IVF. Egg retrieval (ER) was achieved in 194 cycles (67.6%), with a mean of 1.1 oocytes by (ER), and a fertilisation rate of 69.6%. Embryo transfer was achieved in 70 of the 287 cycles (24.4%) with an implantation rate of 23.7%. Analysed globally, the pregnancy rate was 6.97% per cycle started, 10.3% per ER, 28.6% per transfer, and 18.5% per patient.

Discussion

A high percentage of IVF cycles performed in natural cycle are cancelled without reaching embryo transfer. However, analysing the results obtained by ER and transfer, they are an alternative, simple, economical, and slightly aggressive, with acceptable results if we consider their frequent indication in a population of poor prognosis, where more aggressive options do not improve the expectations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信