{"title":"牙刷设计的绘图审查程序","authors":"Smruti Divate, Z. Morse","doi":"10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20222376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A universal method of dental home care regimen has been toothbrushing. It aids with dental biofilm and plaque removal in an attempt to prevent chronic oral diseases. Although many comparative studies have been conducted on toothbrushes and their efficacy in plaque removal, there has been no systematic mapping review focusing on toothbrush design, ease of use and safety. This mapping review aims to map key concepts, categorise existing themes and identify gaps in existing literature for future primary or scoping studies.Methods: The protocol for this mapping review has been designed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Primary and secondary studies, guidelines, and reports about the design, ease of use and safety of toothbrushes will be considered for inclusion in this mapping review. Four databases (Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus) and three sources of unpublished literature (Cochrane Library, Google, and Google Scholar) will be searched using the JBI proposed three-stage search strategy by reviewers independently. A PRISMA-ScR flowchart will be utilised to document the numbers of identified, screened, and excluded sources. Data will be extracted using a data extraction table designed by the reviewers. Extracted data will be summarised and presented in diagrammatic and tabular forms, accompanied by a narrative explanation.Conclusions: Examining the existing literature on toothbrush design is fundamental to guide future research, design innovations, and improve oral health.","PeriodicalId":13787,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","volume":"111 3S 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mapping review protocol for toothbrush design\",\"authors\":\"Smruti Divate, Z. Morse\",\"doi\":\"10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20222376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A universal method of dental home care regimen has been toothbrushing. It aids with dental biofilm and plaque removal in an attempt to prevent chronic oral diseases. Although many comparative studies have been conducted on toothbrushes and their efficacy in plaque removal, there has been no systematic mapping review focusing on toothbrush design, ease of use and safety. This mapping review aims to map key concepts, categorise existing themes and identify gaps in existing literature for future primary or scoping studies.Methods: The protocol for this mapping review has been designed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Primary and secondary studies, guidelines, and reports about the design, ease of use and safety of toothbrushes will be considered for inclusion in this mapping review. Four databases (Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus) and three sources of unpublished literature (Cochrane Library, Google, and Google Scholar) will be searched using the JBI proposed three-stage search strategy by reviewers independently. A PRISMA-ScR flowchart will be utilised to document the numbers of identified, screened, and excluded sources. Data will be extracted using a data extraction table designed by the reviewers. Extracted data will be summarised and presented in diagrammatic and tabular forms, accompanied by a narrative explanation.Conclusions: Examining the existing literature on toothbrush design is fundamental to guide future research, design innovations, and improve oral health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":\"111 3S 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20222376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20222376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:一种普遍的牙科家庭护理方法一直是刷牙。它有助于去除牙齿生物膜和牙菌斑,以预防慢性口腔疾病。虽然对牙刷及其去除牙菌斑的功效进行了许多比较研究,但尚未对牙刷的设计,易用性和安全性进行系统的绘图审查。这篇地图评论的目的是绘制关键概念,对现有主题进行分类,并确定现有文献中的差距,以便将来进行初级或范围研究。方法:本次地图评价的方案是按照系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)和乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)指南设计的。关于牙刷的设计、易用性和安全性的主要和次要研究、指南和报告将被纳入本次地图审查。4个数据库(Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source、CINAHL、MEDLINE和Scopus)和3个未发表文献来源(Cochrane Library、谷歌和谷歌Scholar)将由审稿人独立使用JBI提出的三阶段检索策略进行检索。将使用PRISMA-ScR流程图记录已识别、筛选和排除的来源的数量。使用审稿人设计的数据提取表提取数据。提取的数据将以图表和表格的形式加以总结和呈现,并附有叙述性解释。结论:检查现有的牙刷设计文献是指导未来研究、设计创新和改善口腔健康的基础。
Background: A universal method of dental home care regimen has been toothbrushing. It aids with dental biofilm and plaque removal in an attempt to prevent chronic oral diseases. Although many comparative studies have been conducted on toothbrushes and their efficacy in plaque removal, there has been no systematic mapping review focusing on toothbrush design, ease of use and safety. This mapping review aims to map key concepts, categorise existing themes and identify gaps in existing literature for future primary or scoping studies.Methods: The protocol for this mapping review has been designed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Primary and secondary studies, guidelines, and reports about the design, ease of use and safety of toothbrushes will be considered for inclusion in this mapping review. Four databases (Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus) and three sources of unpublished literature (Cochrane Library, Google, and Google Scholar) will be searched using the JBI proposed three-stage search strategy by reviewers independently. A PRISMA-ScR flowchart will be utilised to document the numbers of identified, screened, and excluded sources. Data will be extracted using a data extraction table designed by the reviewers. Extracted data will be summarised and presented in diagrammatic and tabular forms, accompanied by a narrative explanation.Conclusions: Examining the existing literature on toothbrush design is fundamental to guide future research, design innovations, and improve oral health.