普瑞巴林作为附加治疗在难治性癫痫患者中的有效性的各个方面

E. Viteva
{"title":"普瑞巴林作为附加治疗在难治性癫痫患者中的有效性的各个方面","authors":"E. Viteva","doi":"10.14800/MCE.1616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to perform an open, prospective study on various aspects of PGB effectiveness in Bulgarian patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. It was open, prospective and was performed with the participation of patients with epilepsy who attended the Clinic of Neurology at the University Hospital in Plovdiv, Bulgaria for a regular examination in cases of unsatisfactory seizure control or for adverse events from treatment. Patients completed diaries about seizure frequency, severity, and adverse events. There were regular documented visits at 3 or 6 months during the first year of treatment with pregabalin (PGB) and at 6 months or 1 year afterwards, with dynamic assessment of seizure frequency, severity, adverse events, and EEG recordings. PGB was applied as add-on treatment in 47 patients (24 males, mean age 34 years) with long duration of epilepsy, manifested with predominantly severe and very frequent partial, a combination of partial and generalized or generalized tonic-clonic seizures, refractory to the prescribed, usually combined treatment with a variety of AEDs. There was relatively mild, stable though, dynamic improvement of seizure severity,  satisfactory seizure frequency reduction in 43.5% of participants, stable mean seizure frequency reduction (48-51%) from the 6-th to the 24-th month of the study, as well as a high and stable responder rate (58.7-62.5%) during the same period. New seizure types (generalized tonic-clonic, generalized atonic) appeared in 2 patients. The final clinical efficacy was higher in patients without seizure clusters or status epilepticus in the disease course. EEG improvement was found in a small percentage of patients (less than a third) and it did not correlate with clinical findings and their dynamics. Adverse events (dizziness/vertigo, sleepiness, memory impairment, increased weight, diplopia, lymphadenomegaly, impaired concentration, gastro-intestinal discomfort, transient leucopenia, rash, nausea, anxiety) were reported in 25.53% of patients. They were usually severe and became a cause of treatment termination in 12.8% of patients. In conclusion, PGB treatment is associated with: low and stable improvement of seizure severity, good and stable reduction of seizure frequency, a possibility of seizure control worsening, possible appearance of new seizure types, rare EEG dynamics, acceptable safety and tolerability.","PeriodicalId":18603,"journal":{"name":"Molecular & Cellular Epilepsy","volume":"454 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Various aspects of Pregabalin effectiveness as add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"E. Viteva\",\"doi\":\"10.14800/MCE.1616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the study was to perform an open, prospective study on various aspects of PGB effectiveness in Bulgarian patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. It was open, prospective and was performed with the participation of patients with epilepsy who attended the Clinic of Neurology at the University Hospital in Plovdiv, Bulgaria for a regular examination in cases of unsatisfactory seizure control or for adverse events from treatment. Patients completed diaries about seizure frequency, severity, and adverse events. There were regular documented visits at 3 or 6 months during the first year of treatment with pregabalin (PGB) and at 6 months or 1 year afterwards, with dynamic assessment of seizure frequency, severity, adverse events, and EEG recordings. PGB was applied as add-on treatment in 47 patients (24 males, mean age 34 years) with long duration of epilepsy, manifested with predominantly severe and very frequent partial, a combination of partial and generalized or generalized tonic-clonic seizures, refractory to the prescribed, usually combined treatment with a variety of AEDs. There was relatively mild, stable though, dynamic improvement of seizure severity,  satisfactory seizure frequency reduction in 43.5% of participants, stable mean seizure frequency reduction (48-51%) from the 6-th to the 24-th month of the study, as well as a high and stable responder rate (58.7-62.5%) during the same period. New seizure types (generalized tonic-clonic, generalized atonic) appeared in 2 patients. The final clinical efficacy was higher in patients without seizure clusters or status epilepticus in the disease course. EEG improvement was found in a small percentage of patients (less than a third) and it did not correlate with clinical findings and their dynamics. Adverse events (dizziness/vertigo, sleepiness, memory impairment, increased weight, diplopia, lymphadenomegaly, impaired concentration, gastro-intestinal discomfort, transient leucopenia, rash, nausea, anxiety) were reported in 25.53% of patients. They were usually severe and became a cause of treatment termination in 12.8% of patients. In conclusion, PGB treatment is associated with: low and stable improvement of seizure severity, good and stable reduction of seizure frequency, a possibility of seizure control worsening, possible appearance of new seizure types, rare EEG dynamics, acceptable safety and tolerability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular & Cellular Epilepsy\",\"volume\":\"454 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular & Cellular Epilepsy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14800/MCE.1616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular & Cellular Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14800/MCE.1616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究的目的是对保加利亚耐药癫痫患者PGB有效性的各个方面进行开放的前瞻性研究。该检查是开放的、前瞻性的,在保加利亚普罗夫迪夫大学医院神经内科门诊就诊的癫痫患者参与下进行的,在癫痫发作控制不理想或治疗不良事件的情况下进行定期检查。患者完成关于癫痫发作频率、严重程度和不良事件的日记。在普瑞巴林(PGB)治疗的第一年的第3个月或第6个月以及治疗后的第6个月或第1年,对癫痫发作频率、严重程度、不良事件和脑电图记录进行动态评估。47例癫痫患者(男性24例,平均年龄34岁)持续时间较长,表现为严重且非常频繁的部分性、部分性和全身性或全身性强直阵挛性发作,对处方难治,通常与多种AEDs联合治疗。在研究的第6- 24个月期间,癫痫发作严重程度有相对温和、稳定的动态改善,43.5%的参与者的癫痫发作频率有满意的降低,平均癫痫发作频率稳定降低(48-51%),同期的应答率较高且稳定(58.7-62.5%)。2例出现新的发作类型(全身性强直-阵挛、全身性失张力)。病程中无发作群或癫痫持续状态的患者最终临床疗效较高。在一小部分患者(不到三分之一)中发现脑电图改善,这与临床表现及其动态无关。25.53%的患者报告了不良事件(头晕/眩晕、嗜睡、记忆障碍、体重增加、复视、淋巴肿大、注意力不集中、胃肠道不适、一过性白细胞减少、皮疹、恶心、焦虑)。这些症状通常很严重,12.8%的患者因此终止治疗。综上所述,PGB治疗与以下因素相关:发作严重程度的低而稳定的改善,发作频率的良好而稳定的降低,发作控制恶化的可能性,可能出现新的发作类型,罕见的脑电图动态,可接受的安全性和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Various aspects of Pregabalin effectiveness as add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy
The purpose of the study was to perform an open, prospective study on various aspects of PGB effectiveness in Bulgarian patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. It was open, prospective and was performed with the participation of patients with epilepsy who attended the Clinic of Neurology at the University Hospital in Plovdiv, Bulgaria for a regular examination in cases of unsatisfactory seizure control or for adverse events from treatment. Patients completed diaries about seizure frequency, severity, and adverse events. There were regular documented visits at 3 or 6 months during the first year of treatment with pregabalin (PGB) and at 6 months or 1 year afterwards, with dynamic assessment of seizure frequency, severity, adverse events, and EEG recordings. PGB was applied as add-on treatment in 47 patients (24 males, mean age 34 years) with long duration of epilepsy, manifested with predominantly severe and very frequent partial, a combination of partial and generalized or generalized tonic-clonic seizures, refractory to the prescribed, usually combined treatment with a variety of AEDs. There was relatively mild, stable though, dynamic improvement of seizure severity,  satisfactory seizure frequency reduction in 43.5% of participants, stable mean seizure frequency reduction (48-51%) from the 6-th to the 24-th month of the study, as well as a high and stable responder rate (58.7-62.5%) during the same period. New seizure types (generalized tonic-clonic, generalized atonic) appeared in 2 patients. The final clinical efficacy was higher in patients without seizure clusters or status epilepticus in the disease course. EEG improvement was found in a small percentage of patients (less than a third) and it did not correlate with clinical findings and their dynamics. Adverse events (dizziness/vertigo, sleepiness, memory impairment, increased weight, diplopia, lymphadenomegaly, impaired concentration, gastro-intestinal discomfort, transient leucopenia, rash, nausea, anxiety) were reported in 25.53% of patients. They were usually severe and became a cause of treatment termination in 12.8% of patients. In conclusion, PGB treatment is associated with: low and stable improvement of seizure severity, good and stable reduction of seizure frequency, a possibility of seizure control worsening, possible appearance of new seizure types, rare EEG dynamics, acceptable safety and tolerability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信