“由作者更正”:妇女,诗歌,和17世纪的印刷出版

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
Sarah C. E. Ross, Elizabeth Scott-Baumann
{"title":"“由作者更正”:妇女,诗歌,和17世纪的印刷出版","authors":"Sarah C. E. Ross, Elizabeth Scott-Baumann","doi":"10.1353/hlq.2021.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Early modern women's poetry tends to be read in one of two prevailing critical paradigms. On the one hand, much important scholarship emphasizes revision, augmentation, and the malleability of women's manuscript texts. On the other, print editions of women's texts are celebrated as landmarks; print publication, in this view, bestows new qualities of posterity, stability, and fixity. This essay reinterrogates these paradigms of malleability in manuscript and fixity in print. Focusing on the variant print editions of poetry by Katherine Philips, Anne Bradstreet, and Margaret Cavendish, it reveals a complex contingency to women's printed poetic texts and, in doing so, reassesses women poets' relationship to seventeenth-century print culture.","PeriodicalId":45445,"journal":{"name":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","volume":"128 1","pages":"353 - 381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Corrected by the Author\\\": Women, Poetry, and Seventeenth-Century Print Publication\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C. E. Ross, Elizabeth Scott-Baumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hlq.2021.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Early modern women's poetry tends to be read in one of two prevailing critical paradigms. On the one hand, much important scholarship emphasizes revision, augmentation, and the malleability of women's manuscript texts. On the other, print editions of women's texts are celebrated as landmarks; print publication, in this view, bestows new qualities of posterity, stability, and fixity. This essay reinterrogates these paradigms of malleability in manuscript and fixity in print. Focusing on the variant print editions of poetry by Katherine Philips, Anne Bradstreet, and Margaret Cavendish, it reveals a complex contingency to women's printed poetic texts and, in doing so, reassesses women poets' relationship to seventeenth-century print culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"353 - 381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2021.0027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2021.0027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期现代女性诗歌倾向于用两种主流的批评范式来解读。一方面,许多重要的学术研究强调对女性手稿文本的修改、扩充和延展性。另一方面,女性文本的印刷版被视为里程碑;在这种观点中,印刷出版物赋予了后人、稳定性和固定性的新品质。这篇文章重新审视这些范例的可塑性在手稿和固定印刷。本书聚焦于凯瑟琳·菲利普斯、安妮·布拉德斯特里特和玛格丽特·卡文迪什诗歌的不同印刷版本,揭示了女性印刷诗歌文本的复杂偶然性,并以此重新评估了女性诗人与17世纪印刷文化的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Corrected by the Author": Women, Poetry, and Seventeenth-Century Print Publication
abstract:Early modern women's poetry tends to be read in one of two prevailing critical paradigms. On the one hand, much important scholarship emphasizes revision, augmentation, and the malleability of women's manuscript texts. On the other, print editions of women's texts are celebrated as landmarks; print publication, in this view, bestows new qualities of posterity, stability, and fixity. This essay reinterrogates these paradigms of malleability in manuscript and fixity in print. Focusing on the variant print editions of poetry by Katherine Philips, Anne Bradstreet, and Margaret Cavendish, it reveals a complex contingency to women's printed poetic texts and, in doing so, reassesses women poets' relationship to seventeenth-century print culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信