LVP vs TIPS治疗难治性腹水:我们站在哪里?

R. Varma, Karan Bir Singh, E. Bready, Deepak Singh, T. Caridi, Mohamed Shoreibah
{"title":"LVP vs TIPS治疗难治性腹水:我们站在哪里?","authors":"R. Varma, Karan Bir Singh, E. Bready, Deepak Singh, T. Caridi, Mohamed Shoreibah","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1745863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ascites is the most common complication of end stage liver disease. Refractory ascites is considered a poor prognostic indicator and impacts quality of life, overall survival and contributes significantly to the cost associated with its management. Serial large volume paracentesis (LVP) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement are the most utilized procedures for the management of refractory ascites and have their advantages and disadvantages. The pathophysiology of ascites in cirrhosis is multifactorial which makes management complex, requiring the consideration of multiple clinical and biochemical variables to guide the appropriate management. This article provides a broad overview of LVP and TIPS, with review of the latest clinical trials and meta-analyses to help guide the management of refractory ascites and improve patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":91014,"journal":{"name":"Digestive disease interventions","volume":"311 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LVP vs TIPS for Refractory Ascites: Where Do We Stand?\",\"authors\":\"R. Varma, Karan Bir Singh, E. Bready, Deepak Singh, T. Caridi, Mohamed Shoreibah\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1745863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ascites is the most common complication of end stage liver disease. Refractory ascites is considered a poor prognostic indicator and impacts quality of life, overall survival and contributes significantly to the cost associated with its management. Serial large volume paracentesis (LVP) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement are the most utilized procedures for the management of refractory ascites and have their advantages and disadvantages. The pathophysiology of ascites in cirrhosis is multifactorial which makes management complex, requiring the consideration of multiple clinical and biochemical variables to guide the appropriate management. This article provides a broad overview of LVP and TIPS, with review of the latest clinical trials and meta-analyses to help guide the management of refractory ascites and improve patient outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive disease interventions\",\"volume\":\"311 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive disease interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1745863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive disease interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1745863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹水是终末期肝病最常见的并发症。难治性腹水被认为是一个不良的预后指标,影响生活质量和总体生存,并显著增加其管理成本。连续大容量穿刺(LVP)和经颈静脉肝内门体分流(TIPS)放置是治疗难治性腹水最常用的方法,有其优点和缺点。肝硬化腹水的病理生理是多因素的,这使得治疗变得复杂,需要考虑多个临床和生化变量来指导适当的治疗。本文提供了LVP和TIPS的广泛概述,回顾了最新的临床试验和荟萃分析,以帮助指导难治性腹水的管理和改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LVP vs TIPS for Refractory Ascites: Where Do We Stand?
Ascites is the most common complication of end stage liver disease. Refractory ascites is considered a poor prognostic indicator and impacts quality of life, overall survival and contributes significantly to the cost associated with its management. Serial large volume paracentesis (LVP) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement are the most utilized procedures for the management of refractory ascites and have their advantages and disadvantages. The pathophysiology of ascites in cirrhosis is multifactorial which makes management complex, requiring the consideration of multiple clinical and biochemical variables to guide the appropriate management. This article provides a broad overview of LVP and TIPS, with review of the latest clinical trials and meta-analyses to help guide the management of refractory ascites and improve patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信