2015年和2022年修订特殊教育课程中与数字公民相关的成就标准的比较分析

Jeehae Chol, Minkyeong Kim, S. Ju
{"title":"2015年和2022年修订特殊教育课程中与数字公民相关的成就标准的比较分析","authors":"Jeehae Chol, Minkyeong Kim, S. Ju","doi":"10.14333/kjte.2023.39.3.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore educational implications by comparing and analyzingachievement standards related to digital citizenship in the 2015 and 2022 special education curriculumand to present directions for digital citizenship education for special need students in the future. Methods: In this study, digital citizenship-related subjects of the 2015 and 2022 revised specialeducation curriculum were selected and analyzed using the analysis framework of previous studiesrelated to digital citizenship. In addition, in order to confirm the reliability and validity of the analysisresults, reliability between analysts and expert content validity were executed. Results: It was found that the achievement standards related to digital citizenship increased in the2022 revised basic special education curriculum compared to the 2015 revised special educationcurriculum. According to the analysis results by subject, the Korean language department was themost frequent in the 2015 revised special education curriculum, but the information and communicationutilization department was the most frequent in the 2022 revised special education curriculum. Asfor the results of the analysis by school level, the high school level was the highest in both the 2015and 2022 revised basic curriculum of special education. The results of the analysis by digital citizenshiparea showed a high proportion of functional areas in both the 2015 and 2022 special educationcurriculum, and the results of the analysis by subtype showed the highest rational digital communicationability in the functional area. Conclusion: First, special teachers should recognize the digital society, be interested in preventingpeople with developmental disabilities from being alienated from the digital world, and develop theireducational capabilities. Second, in special education, it is necessary to conduct basic research ondigital citizenship by life cycle, such as a study on selecting digital citizenship education contentssuitable for the characteristics of special education subjects from elementary school level to adults. Third, special teachers should design classes so that they can become holistic digital civic education.","PeriodicalId":22672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of achievement standards related to digital citizenship in the 2015 and 2022 revised special education curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Jeehae Chol, Minkyeong Kim, S. Ju\",\"doi\":\"10.14333/kjte.2023.39.3.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore educational implications by comparing and analyzingachievement standards related to digital citizenship in the 2015 and 2022 special education curriculumand to present directions for digital citizenship education for special need students in the future. Methods: In this study, digital citizenship-related subjects of the 2015 and 2022 revised specialeducation curriculum were selected and analyzed using the analysis framework of previous studiesrelated to digital citizenship. In addition, in order to confirm the reliability and validity of the analysisresults, reliability between analysts and expert content validity were executed. Results: It was found that the achievement standards related to digital citizenship increased in the2022 revised basic special education curriculum compared to the 2015 revised special educationcurriculum. According to the analysis results by subject, the Korean language department was themost frequent in the 2015 revised special education curriculum, but the information and communicationutilization department was the most frequent in the 2022 revised special education curriculum. Asfor the results of the analysis by school level, the high school level was the highest in both the 2015and 2022 revised basic curriculum of special education. The results of the analysis by digital citizenshiparea showed a high proportion of functional areas in both the 2015 and 2022 special educationcurriculum, and the results of the analysis by subtype showed the highest rational digital communicationability in the functional area. Conclusion: First, special teachers should recognize the digital society, be interested in preventingpeople with developmental disabilities from being alienated from the digital world, and develop theireducational capabilities. Second, in special education, it is necessary to conduct basic research ondigital citizenship by life cycle, such as a study on selecting digital citizenship education contentssuitable for the characteristics of special education subjects from elementary school level to adults. Third, special teachers should design classes so that they can become holistic digital civic education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14333/kjte.2023.39.3.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Korean Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14333/kjte.2023.39.3.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过比较分析2015年和2022年特殊教育课程中与数字公民相关的成就标准,探讨教育意义,并提出未来特殊需要学生数字公民教育的方向。方法:本研究选取2015年和2022年修订的专业教育课程中与数字公民身份相关的科目,运用以往数字公民身份相关研究的分析框架进行分析。此外,为了确认分析结果的信度和效度,进行了分析人员与专家内容效度之间的信度分析。结果:与2015年修订的特殊教育基础课程相比,2022年修订的特殊教育基础课程中与数字公民相关的成就标准有所提高。从科目分析结果来看,2015年特殊教育课程修改稿中出现频率最高的是韩国语系,而2022年特殊教育课程修改稿中出现频率最高的是信息通信利用系。从学校层次分析结果来看,2015年和2022年修订的特殊教育基础课程中,高中层次的学生比例最高。2015年和2022年特殊教育课程中,数字公民区分析结果显示功能区所占比例较高,按亚型分析结果显示功能区的合理数字沟通能力最高。结论:首先,特殊教师应该认识到数字社会,有兴趣防止发育障碍人士与数字世界疏远,并发展他们的教育能力。其次,在特殊教育中,有必要对数字公民进行生命周期的基础研究,如从小学阶段到成人阶段,选择适合特殊教育学科特点的数字公民教育内容的研究。第三,特殊教师应设计课程,使其成为全面的数字公民教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of achievement standards related to digital citizenship in the 2015 and 2022 revised special education curriculum
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore educational implications by comparing and analyzingachievement standards related to digital citizenship in the 2015 and 2022 special education curriculumand to present directions for digital citizenship education for special need students in the future. Methods: In this study, digital citizenship-related subjects of the 2015 and 2022 revised specialeducation curriculum were selected and analyzed using the analysis framework of previous studiesrelated to digital citizenship. In addition, in order to confirm the reliability and validity of the analysisresults, reliability between analysts and expert content validity were executed. Results: It was found that the achievement standards related to digital citizenship increased in the2022 revised basic special education curriculum compared to the 2015 revised special educationcurriculum. According to the analysis results by subject, the Korean language department was themost frequent in the 2015 revised special education curriculum, but the information and communicationutilization department was the most frequent in the 2022 revised special education curriculum. Asfor the results of the analysis by school level, the high school level was the highest in both the 2015and 2022 revised basic curriculum of special education. The results of the analysis by digital citizenshiparea showed a high proportion of functional areas in both the 2015 and 2022 special educationcurriculum, and the results of the analysis by subtype showed the highest rational digital communicationability in the functional area. Conclusion: First, special teachers should recognize the digital society, be interested in preventingpeople with developmental disabilities from being alienated from the digital world, and develop theireducational capabilities. Second, in special education, it is necessary to conduct basic research ondigital citizenship by life cycle, such as a study on selecting digital citizenship education contentssuitable for the characteristics of special education subjects from elementary school level to adults. Third, special teachers should design classes so that they can become holistic digital civic education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信