腺苷应激心肌灌注显像与超声心动图在同一输注下的应用

K. Pinar, Dagli Necati, Balci Tansel Ansal, Karaca Ilgin, Kepenek Ferat, Cakmak Tolga
{"title":"腺苷应激心肌灌注显像与超声心动图在同一输注下的应用","authors":"K. Pinar, Dagli Necati, Balci Tansel Ansal, Karaca Ilgin, Kepenek Ferat, Cakmak Tolga","doi":"10.23937/2378-2951/1410106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Stress Echocardiography (Echo) and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy (MPS) are effective methods for identification of myocardial ischemia. Aim of this study was to compare adenosine stress MPS and Echo results with gold standard angiography. Methods: Twenty nine patients (18 F, 11 M; mean: 49, 62 ± 10, 9; 45, 5-53, 8-years-old) with suspicion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) were included into the study. After performance of basal Echo examination, adenosine infusion was started (140 μgr/kg/dk) and at the third minute after starting the infusion, intravenous Tc-99m MIBI injection was performed and stress Echo findings were recorded at the 10th minute. Stress and rest imaging were performed at the same day. Stress Echo was performed by an experienced cardiologist and MPS results were interpreted by an experienced nuclear medicine physician who didn’t know stress Echo results according to 17 segment models. Sixteen patients underwent coronary angiography. Ischemia territory size in both the adenosine stress Echo and MPS were recorded and compared in segment and in patient basis. Results: There were 34 ischemic segments in MPS and 46 in stress Echo among 493 segments of 29 patients. Both MPS and stress Echo pointed the same ischemic segments in 9 patients and tests were in agreement in 24 patients. Angiography confirmed two tests results in 13/16 patients. Three patients with severe ischemia in the MPS and stress Echo had slow flow pattern in the angiography. Conclusion: The results of both MPS and stress Echo with same adenosine infusion was in agreement especially in patients with angiography results. These findings can encourage simultaneous studies with same stress agent infusion.","PeriodicalId":15510,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adenosine Stress Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy and Echocardiography Application with Same Infusion\",\"authors\":\"K. Pinar, Dagli Necati, Balci Tansel Ansal, Karaca Ilgin, Kepenek Ferat, Cakmak Tolga\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-2951/1410106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Stress Echocardiography (Echo) and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy (MPS) are effective methods for identification of myocardial ischemia. Aim of this study was to compare adenosine stress MPS and Echo results with gold standard angiography. Methods: Twenty nine patients (18 F, 11 M; mean: 49, 62 ± 10, 9; 45, 5-53, 8-years-old) with suspicion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) were included into the study. After performance of basal Echo examination, adenosine infusion was started (140 μgr/kg/dk) and at the third minute after starting the infusion, intravenous Tc-99m MIBI injection was performed and stress Echo findings were recorded at the 10th minute. Stress and rest imaging were performed at the same day. Stress Echo was performed by an experienced cardiologist and MPS results were interpreted by an experienced nuclear medicine physician who didn’t know stress Echo results according to 17 segment models. Sixteen patients underwent coronary angiography. Ischemia territory size in both the adenosine stress Echo and MPS were recorded and compared in segment and in patient basis. Results: There were 34 ischemic segments in MPS and 46 in stress Echo among 493 segments of 29 patients. Both MPS and stress Echo pointed the same ischemic segments in 9 patients and tests were in agreement in 24 patients. Angiography confirmed two tests results in 13/16 patients. Three patients with severe ischemia in the MPS and stress Echo had slow flow pattern in the angiography. Conclusion: The results of both MPS and stress Echo with same adenosine infusion was in agreement especially in patients with angiography results. These findings can encourage simultaneous studies with same stress agent infusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-2951/1410106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-2951/1410106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应激超声心动图(Echo)和心肌灌注显像(MPS)是鉴别心肌缺血的有效方法。本研究的目的是比较腺苷应激MPS和回声结果与金标准血管造影。方法:29例患者(F 18例,M 11例;平均值:49.62±10.9;研究对象为疑似冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的45,5 - 53,8岁。基础回声检查完成后,开始腺苷输注(140 μgr/kg/dk),开始输注后第3分钟静脉注射Tc-99m MIBI,第10分钟记录应激回声。同一天进行应激和休息成像。应激回声由经验丰富的心脏病专家进行,MPS结果由经验丰富的核医学医生根据17个节段模型解释,该医生不知道应激回声结果。16例患者行冠状动脉造影。记录腺苷应激回声和MPS的缺血区域大小,并在节段和患者基础上进行比较。结果:29例患者493个节段中,MPS有34个缺血节段,应激回声有46个。9例患者MPS和应激回声均指向相同的缺血节段,24例患者检测结果一致。血管造影证实了13/16例患者的两项检查结果。3例MPS和应激回声严重缺血的患者血管造影显示血流缓慢。结论:相同腺苷输注时,MPS和应激回声的结果一致,特别是在血管造影结果的患者中。这些发现可以鼓励同时进行相同应激剂输注的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adenosine Stress Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy and Echocardiography Application with Same Infusion
Objective: Stress Echocardiography (Echo) and Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy (MPS) are effective methods for identification of myocardial ischemia. Aim of this study was to compare adenosine stress MPS and Echo results with gold standard angiography. Methods: Twenty nine patients (18 F, 11 M; mean: 49, 62 ± 10, 9; 45, 5-53, 8-years-old) with suspicion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) were included into the study. After performance of basal Echo examination, adenosine infusion was started (140 μgr/kg/dk) and at the third minute after starting the infusion, intravenous Tc-99m MIBI injection was performed and stress Echo findings were recorded at the 10th minute. Stress and rest imaging were performed at the same day. Stress Echo was performed by an experienced cardiologist and MPS results were interpreted by an experienced nuclear medicine physician who didn’t know stress Echo results according to 17 segment models. Sixteen patients underwent coronary angiography. Ischemia territory size in both the adenosine stress Echo and MPS were recorded and compared in segment and in patient basis. Results: There were 34 ischemic segments in MPS and 46 in stress Echo among 493 segments of 29 patients. Both MPS and stress Echo pointed the same ischemic segments in 9 patients and tests were in agreement in 24 patients. Angiography confirmed two tests results in 13/16 patients. Three patients with severe ischemia in the MPS and stress Echo had slow flow pattern in the angiography. Conclusion: The results of both MPS and stress Echo with same adenosine infusion was in agreement especially in patients with angiography results. These findings can encourage simultaneous studies with same stress agent infusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信