3从白人女性的种族主义暴力反思女性主义的罪论

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Horizons Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1017/hor.2023.8
Megan K. McCabe
{"title":"3从白人女性的种族主义暴力反思女性主义的罪论","authors":"Megan K. McCabe","doi":"10.1017/hor.2023.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1960, Valerie Saiving published a groundbreaking essay, “The Human Situation: a Feminine View,” in which she pointed to the failures of classical sin-talk to account for the ways that women sin. As an early work of feminist theology, the article pointed to the androcentrism of theology: classical notions of sin were rooted in the failures and temptations of men. It also set the stage for feminist treatment of sin going forward. For Saiving, it was theologically inaccurate to identify women's experience of sinfulness with pride and will-to-power. Instead, she argues, the “feminine forms of sin … are better suggested by such items as triviality, distractibility, and diffuseness … in short, underdevelopment or negation of the self.”","PeriodicalId":13231,"journal":{"name":"Horizons","volume":"42 1","pages":"200 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"III. Rethinking Feminist Theologies of Sin in Light of White Women's Racist Violence\",\"authors\":\"Megan K. McCabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/hor.2023.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1960, Valerie Saiving published a groundbreaking essay, “The Human Situation: a Feminine View,” in which she pointed to the failures of classical sin-talk to account for the ways that women sin. As an early work of feminist theology, the article pointed to the androcentrism of theology: classical notions of sin were rooted in the failures and temptations of men. It also set the stage for feminist treatment of sin going forward. For Saiving, it was theologically inaccurate to identify women's experience of sinfulness with pride and will-to-power. Instead, she argues, the “feminine forms of sin … are better suggested by such items as triviality, distractibility, and diffuseness … in short, underdevelopment or negation of the self.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":13231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Horizons\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"200 - 207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/hor.2023.8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hor.2023.8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1960年,瓦莱丽·萨文(Valerie Saiving)发表了一篇开创性的文章《人类处境:女性视角》(The Human Situation: a Feminine View),她在文中指出,经典的罪论无法解释女性犯罪的方式。作为女性主义神学的早期作品,这篇文章指出了神学的男性中心主义:经典的罪恶观念根植于男人的失败和诱惑。它也为女权主义对待罪恶的方式奠定了基础。对于saving来说,将女性的罪恶经历与骄傲和权力意志联系起来在神学上是不准确的。相反,她认为,“女性的罪恶形式……更适合用诸如琐碎、分心和分散……简而言之,不发达或对自我的否定。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
III. Rethinking Feminist Theologies of Sin in Light of White Women's Racist Violence
In 1960, Valerie Saiving published a groundbreaking essay, “The Human Situation: a Feminine View,” in which she pointed to the failures of classical sin-talk to account for the ways that women sin. As an early work of feminist theology, the article pointed to the androcentrism of theology: classical notions of sin were rooted in the failures and temptations of men. It also set the stage for feminist treatment of sin going forward. For Saiving, it was theologically inaccurate to identify women's experience of sinfulness with pride and will-to-power. Instead, she argues, the “feminine forms of sin … are better suggested by such items as triviality, distractibility, and diffuseness … in short, underdevelopment or negation of the self.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Horizons
Horizons RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信