{"title":"3从白人女性的种族主义暴力反思女性主义的罪论","authors":"Megan K. McCabe","doi":"10.1017/hor.2023.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1960, Valerie Saiving published a groundbreaking essay, “The Human Situation: a Feminine View,” in which she pointed to the failures of classical sin-talk to account for the ways that women sin. As an early work of feminist theology, the article pointed to the androcentrism of theology: classical notions of sin were rooted in the failures and temptations of men. It also set the stage for feminist treatment of sin going forward. For Saiving, it was theologically inaccurate to identify women's experience of sinfulness with pride and will-to-power. Instead, she argues, the “feminine forms of sin … are better suggested by such items as triviality, distractibility, and diffuseness … in short, underdevelopment or negation of the self.”","PeriodicalId":13231,"journal":{"name":"Horizons","volume":"42 1","pages":"200 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"III. Rethinking Feminist Theologies of Sin in Light of White Women's Racist Violence\",\"authors\":\"Megan K. McCabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/hor.2023.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1960, Valerie Saiving published a groundbreaking essay, “The Human Situation: a Feminine View,” in which she pointed to the failures of classical sin-talk to account for the ways that women sin. As an early work of feminist theology, the article pointed to the androcentrism of theology: classical notions of sin were rooted in the failures and temptations of men. It also set the stage for feminist treatment of sin going forward. For Saiving, it was theologically inaccurate to identify women's experience of sinfulness with pride and will-to-power. Instead, she argues, the “feminine forms of sin … are better suggested by such items as triviality, distractibility, and diffuseness … in short, underdevelopment or negation of the self.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":13231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Horizons\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"200 - 207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Horizons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/hor.2023.8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hor.2023.8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1960年,瓦莱丽·萨文(Valerie Saiving)发表了一篇开创性的文章《人类处境:女性视角》(The Human Situation: a Feminine View),她在文中指出,经典的罪论无法解释女性犯罪的方式。作为女性主义神学的早期作品,这篇文章指出了神学的男性中心主义:经典的罪恶观念根植于男人的失败和诱惑。它也为女权主义对待罪恶的方式奠定了基础。对于saving来说,将女性的罪恶经历与骄傲和权力意志联系起来在神学上是不准确的。相反,她认为,“女性的罪恶形式……更适合用诸如琐碎、分心和分散……简而言之,不发达或对自我的否定。”
III. Rethinking Feminist Theologies of Sin in Light of White Women's Racist Violence
In 1960, Valerie Saiving published a groundbreaking essay, “The Human Situation: a Feminine View,” in which she pointed to the failures of classical sin-talk to account for the ways that women sin. As an early work of feminist theology, the article pointed to the androcentrism of theology: classical notions of sin were rooted in the failures and temptations of men. It also set the stage for feminist treatment of sin going forward. For Saiving, it was theologically inaccurate to identify women's experience of sinfulness with pride and will-to-power. Instead, she argues, the “feminine forms of sin … are better suggested by such items as triviality, distractibility, and diffuseness … in short, underdevelopment or negation of the self.”