A. Solahuddin, A. Firdaus, S. Qudsy
{"title":"ṢALLÛ FÎ RIḤÂLIKUM DURING COVID-19","authors":"A. Solahuddin, A. Firdaus, S. Qudsy","doi":"10.18860/ua.v21i2.10139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Indonesian people talk about the additional ṣallû fî riḥâlikum in azan, thus questioning the hadith that is referred to. Afterwards, the Indonesian ‘Ulamâ’ Council (MUI) immediately states that ṣallû fî riḥâlikum refers to al-Bukhârî: 632; 666 and Muslim: 699. Next, MUI appeals to muezzins to read the additional in the hope that people will not attend mosques and avoid communal worship. Even so, public still do not fully believe in MUI, and the ṣallû fî riḥâlikum was not announced, hence the congregational prayers continued. With this background, this paper attempts to address this problem by using culture-shock, reception, sociology theories. This research found that, ṣallû fî riḥâlikum became a cultural shock and was perceived in Indonesia with three kinds of models: dominant, negotiated, and optional readings. Ṣallû fî riḥâlikum becomes an \"objective meaning\" and is used by Muslims when prayer itself is more important than congregational prayer in order to avoid demolition. Ṣallû fî riḥâlikum is expressed in various forms. Some read it while holding back sobs, others refuse. In the end ṣallû fî riḥâlikum became cultural documentation for Muslims as a whole.","PeriodicalId":53390,"journal":{"name":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v21i2.10139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多印度尼西亚人谈论阿赞的额外ṣallû fî riḥâlikum,从而质疑所提到的圣训。随后,印度尼西亚“ulam”理事会(MUI)立即声明ṣallû fî riḥâlikum指的是al-Bukhârî: 632;666和穆斯林:699。接下来,MUI呼吁宣礼员阅读附加内容,希望人们不要去清真寺,避免集体礼拜。尽管如此,公众仍然不完全相信MUI, ṣallû fî riḥâlikum也没有宣布,因此会众的祈祷仍在继续。在此背景下,本文试图运用文化冲击理论、接受理论、社会学理论来解决这一问题。本研究发现,ṣallû fî riḥâlikum成为一种文化冲击,并在印度尼西亚以三种模式被感知:主导阅读、协商阅读和选择性阅读。Ṣallû fî riḥâlikum成为一种“客观意义”,当祈祷本身比集会祈祷更重要时,穆斯林就会使用它,以避免拆迁。Ṣallû fî riḥâlikum的表达形式多种多样。有些人一边读一边忍住哭泣,其他人则拒绝。最终,ṣallû fî riḥâlikum成为了整个穆斯林的文化文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ṢALLÛ FÎ RIḤÂLIKUM DURING COVID-19
Many Indonesian people talk about the additional ṣallû fî riḥâlikum in azan, thus questioning the hadith that is referred to. Afterwards, the Indonesian ‘Ulamâ’ Council (MUI) immediately states that ṣallû fî riḥâlikum refers to al-Bukhârî: 632; 666 and Muslim: 699. Next, MUI appeals to muezzins to read the additional in the hope that people will not attend mosques and avoid communal worship. Even so, public still do not fully believe in MUI, and the ṣallû fî riḥâlikum was not announced, hence the congregational prayers continued. With this background, this paper attempts to address this problem by using culture-shock, reception, sociology theories. This research found that, ṣallû fî riḥâlikum became a cultural shock and was perceived in Indonesia with three kinds of models: dominant, negotiated, and optional readings. Ṣallû fî riḥâlikum becomes an "objective meaning" and is used by Muslims when prayer itself is more important than congregational prayer in order to avoid demolition. Ṣallû fî riḥâlikum is expressed in various forms. Some read it while holding back sobs, others refuse. In the end ṣallû fî riḥâlikum became cultural documentation for Muslims as a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信