导论:跨国中国电影、霸权与华莱坞

IF 0.5 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
D. Fleming, Maria Elena Indelicato
{"title":"导论:跨国中国电影、霸权与华莱坞","authors":"D. Fleming, Maria Elena Indelicato","doi":"10.1080/25785273.2019.1681650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT China’s past status as a semi-colony and historical fragmentation into three main territorial entities has meant that defining what constitutes Chinese cinema(s), or indeed cinematic Chineseness, has always been at the forefront of heated debates surrounding transborder practice, production and conceptualisation. Such deliberations have intensified recently due to intensified efforts to render Chineseness a cultural signifier increasingly implicated with transborder cinematic products designed to compete with Hollywood on the global stage. The introduction to this special issue, entitled ‘Situating “Huallywood:” Histories, Trajectories, and Positionings’ opens up these debates to the field of transnational Chinese cinemas, setting out a range of new questions and perspectives that problematize established understandings of Chinese-Western cinematic relations.","PeriodicalId":36578,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Screens","volume":"1 1","pages":"137 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: on transnational Chinese cinema(s), hegemony and Huallywood(s)\",\"authors\":\"D. Fleming, Maria Elena Indelicato\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25785273.2019.1681650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT China’s past status as a semi-colony and historical fragmentation into three main territorial entities has meant that defining what constitutes Chinese cinema(s), or indeed cinematic Chineseness, has always been at the forefront of heated debates surrounding transborder practice, production and conceptualisation. Such deliberations have intensified recently due to intensified efforts to render Chineseness a cultural signifier increasingly implicated with transborder cinematic products designed to compete with Hollywood on the global stage. The introduction to this special issue, entitled ‘Situating “Huallywood:” Histories, Trajectories, and Positionings’ opens up these debates to the field of transnational Chinese cinemas, setting out a range of new questions and perspectives that problematize established understandings of Chinese-Western cinematic relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Screens\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"137 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Screens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785273.2019.1681650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Screens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785273.2019.1681650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

中国过去作为半殖民地的地位和历史上分裂为三个主要领土实体的历史,意味着定义什么是中国电影,或者确切地说,电影中国性,一直处于围绕跨境实践、生产和概念化的激烈辩论的前沿。这种思考最近愈演愈烈,因为越来越多的努力使中国成为一种文化符号,越来越多地与旨在与好莱坞在全球舞台上竞争的跨国电影产品联系在一起。本期特刊题为《华莱坞的定位:历史、轨迹和定位》的导言将这些争论引向了中国跨国电影领域,提出了一系列新的问题和观点,使人们对中西方电影关系的既定理解变得有问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction: on transnational Chinese cinema(s), hegemony and Huallywood(s)
ABSTRACT China’s past status as a semi-colony and historical fragmentation into three main territorial entities has meant that defining what constitutes Chinese cinema(s), or indeed cinematic Chineseness, has always been at the forefront of heated debates surrounding transborder practice, production and conceptualisation. Such deliberations have intensified recently due to intensified efforts to render Chineseness a cultural signifier increasingly implicated with transborder cinematic products designed to compete with Hollywood on the global stage. The introduction to this special issue, entitled ‘Situating “Huallywood:” Histories, Trajectories, and Positionings’ opens up these debates to the field of transnational Chinese cinemas, setting out a range of new questions and perspectives that problematize established understandings of Chinese-Western cinematic relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transnational Screens
Transnational Screens Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信