Moe Yamaguchi, S. Morino, S. Nishiguchi, N. Fukutani, Y. Tashiro, Hidehiko Shirooka, Yuma Nozaki, Hinako Hirata, Daisuke Matsumoto, T. Aoyama
{"title":"未怀孕妇女、孕妇和产后妇女盆腔对准的比较(盆腔对准与妊娠)","authors":"Moe Yamaguchi, S. Morino, S. Nishiguchi, N. Fukutani, Y. Tashiro, Hidehiko Shirooka, Yuma Nozaki, Hinako Hirata, Daisuke Matsumoto, T. Aoyama","doi":"10.4172/2167-0420.1000294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the pelvic alignment among never-pregnant women, pregnant women, and postpartum women. \nMethods: A total of 177 nulliparous women (mean age, 18.9 ± 1.0 years), 45 pregnant women between the third and tenth month of pregnancy (mean age, 29.4 ± 3.8 years), and 124 primiparous women between the first and sixth months after delivery (mean age, 30.1 ± 4.4 years) were enrolled in this study. Pelvic alignment was measured by using the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS) as landmarks. The bilateral difference of pelvic tilt was defined as pelvic asymmetry (PA), the distance between bilateral ASIS was defined as the anterior width of the pelvis (AWP), and the distance between the bilateral PSIS was defined as the posterior width of the pelvis (PWP). \nResults: PA of the pregnant group and postpartum group were significantly greater than the never-pregnant group (2.8 ± 2.4°, 4.2 ± 3.0°, and 3.7 ± 3.2°, respectively, p < 0.001). AWP of the pregnant and postpartum group was wider than the never-pregnant group (24.9 ± 0.3 cm, 24.1 ± 0.1 cm, and 23.6 ± 0.2 cm, respectively, p < 0.001). PWP of the pregnant and postpartum group was narrower than the never-pregnant group (8.2 ± 0.3 cm, 8.6 ± 0.1 cm, and 9.2 ± 0.1 cm, respectively, p = 0.008). In the multivariate regression analysis using never-pregnant women as the reference, pregnant and postpartum women were significantly more likely to have greater PA (β = 0.156, 0.156), wider AWP (β = 0.116, 0.202), and narrower PWP (β = -0.132, -0.147) than never-pregnant women. \nConclusions: We found that the alignment of the pelvis was different among never-pregnant, pregnant, and postpartum women.","PeriodicalId":17626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Womens Health Care","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Pelvic Alignment among Never-Pregnant Women, Pregnant Women and Postpartum Women (Pelvic Alignment and Pregnancy)\",\"authors\":\"Moe Yamaguchi, S. Morino, S. Nishiguchi, N. Fukutani, Y. Tashiro, Hidehiko Shirooka, Yuma Nozaki, Hinako Hirata, Daisuke Matsumoto, T. Aoyama\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-0420.1000294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the pelvic alignment among never-pregnant women, pregnant women, and postpartum women. \\nMethods: A total of 177 nulliparous women (mean age, 18.9 ± 1.0 years), 45 pregnant women between the third and tenth month of pregnancy (mean age, 29.4 ± 3.8 years), and 124 primiparous women between the first and sixth months after delivery (mean age, 30.1 ± 4.4 years) were enrolled in this study. Pelvic alignment was measured by using the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS) as landmarks. The bilateral difference of pelvic tilt was defined as pelvic asymmetry (PA), the distance between bilateral ASIS was defined as the anterior width of the pelvis (AWP), and the distance between the bilateral PSIS was defined as the posterior width of the pelvis (PWP). \\nResults: PA of the pregnant group and postpartum group were significantly greater than the never-pregnant group (2.8 ± 2.4°, 4.2 ± 3.0°, and 3.7 ± 3.2°, respectively, p < 0.001). AWP of the pregnant and postpartum group was wider than the never-pregnant group (24.9 ± 0.3 cm, 24.1 ± 0.1 cm, and 23.6 ± 0.2 cm, respectively, p < 0.001). PWP of the pregnant and postpartum group was narrower than the never-pregnant group (8.2 ± 0.3 cm, 8.6 ± 0.1 cm, and 9.2 ± 0.1 cm, respectively, p = 0.008). In the multivariate regression analysis using never-pregnant women as the reference, pregnant and postpartum women were significantly more likely to have greater PA (β = 0.156, 0.156), wider AWP (β = 0.116, 0.202), and narrower PWP (β = -0.132, -0.147) than never-pregnant women. \\nConclusions: We found that the alignment of the pelvis was different among never-pregnant, pregnant, and postpartum women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Womens Health Care\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Womens Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0420.1000294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Womens Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0420.1000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
目的:比较未怀孕妇女、孕妇和产后妇女的骨盆直线。方法:共纳入177例未生育妇女(平均年龄18.9±1.0岁),45例妊娠3 ~ 10个月孕妇(平均年龄29.4±3.8岁),124例产后1 ~ 6个月初产妇女(平均年龄30.1±4.4岁)。通过髂前上棘(ASIS)和髂后上棘(PSIS)作为标志来测量骨盆对齐。双侧骨盆倾斜差异定义为骨盆不对称(PA),双侧ASIS之间的距离定义为骨盆前宽(AWP),双侧PSIS之间的距离定义为骨盆后宽(PWP)。结果:妊娠组和产后组PA均显著大于未妊娠组(分别为2.8±2.4°、4.2±3.0°和3.7±3.2°,p < 0.001)。妊娠组和产后组AWP较未妊娠组宽(分别为24.9±0.3 cm、24.1±0.1 cm和23.6±0.2 cm, p < 0.001)。妊娠组和产后组PWP较未妊娠组窄(分别为8.2±0.3 cm、8.6±0.1 cm和9.2±0.1 cm, p = 0.008)。在以未怀孕妇女为参照的多因素回归分析中,孕妇和产后妇女的PA (β = 0.156, 0.156)、AWP (β = 0.116, 0.202)和PWP (β = -0.132, -0.147)均明显高于未怀孕妇女。结论:我们发现未怀孕、怀孕和产后妇女骨盆的排列是不同的。
Comparison of Pelvic Alignment among Never-Pregnant Women, Pregnant Women and Postpartum Women (Pelvic Alignment and Pregnancy)
Objective: To compare the pelvic alignment among never-pregnant women, pregnant women, and postpartum women.
Methods: A total of 177 nulliparous women (mean age, 18.9 ± 1.0 years), 45 pregnant women between the third and tenth month of pregnancy (mean age, 29.4 ± 3.8 years), and 124 primiparous women between the first and sixth months after delivery (mean age, 30.1 ± 4.4 years) were enrolled in this study. Pelvic alignment was measured by using the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spines (PSIS) as landmarks. The bilateral difference of pelvic tilt was defined as pelvic asymmetry (PA), the distance between bilateral ASIS was defined as the anterior width of the pelvis (AWP), and the distance between the bilateral PSIS was defined as the posterior width of the pelvis (PWP).
Results: PA of the pregnant group and postpartum group were significantly greater than the never-pregnant group (2.8 ± 2.4°, 4.2 ± 3.0°, and 3.7 ± 3.2°, respectively, p < 0.001). AWP of the pregnant and postpartum group was wider than the never-pregnant group (24.9 ± 0.3 cm, 24.1 ± 0.1 cm, and 23.6 ± 0.2 cm, respectively, p < 0.001). PWP of the pregnant and postpartum group was narrower than the never-pregnant group (8.2 ± 0.3 cm, 8.6 ± 0.1 cm, and 9.2 ± 0.1 cm, respectively, p = 0.008). In the multivariate regression analysis using never-pregnant women as the reference, pregnant and postpartum women were significantly more likely to have greater PA (β = 0.156, 0.156), wider AWP (β = 0.116, 0.202), and narrower PWP (β = -0.132, -0.147) than never-pregnant women.
Conclusions: We found that the alignment of the pelvis was different among never-pregnant, pregnant, and postpartum women.