平衡全球共享无线电通信资源管理中的公平和效率问题

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
R. Frieden
{"title":"平衡全球共享无线电通信资源管理中的公平和效率问题","authors":"R. Frieden","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.360541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will examine the merits of maintaining, revamping or abandoning the current administrative processes for managing international spectrum and satellite orbital slots. It will examine efficiency enhancing strategies including the use of competitive bidding and technological innovations that make it possible for more users with possibly different service requirements to share the same spectrum. Having considered the similarities and differences in satellites' spectrum use relative to earthbound uses, the article concludes that developing a market for orbital slots in lieu of the existing multilateral coordination and registration process would impose more costs and problems than benefits. The transborder technological characteristics of satellites raise sovereignty, equity and jurisdictional issues not triggered by economic and technological initiatives for terrestrial spectrum use. Accordingly, neither international, multilateral forums nor domestic policy making bodies can jettison the status quo and implement a competitive bidding model for all types of spectrum regardless of geographical coverage and transmission characteristics. In particular spectrum used for international satellite services and access to the orbital parking places used by satellites do not favor a complete migration to competitive bidding. Proponents of competitive bidding for spectrum have largely ignored the fact that many nations lie under a satellite transmission \"footprint,\" treaty commitments foreclose national or private ownership of outer space resources and the likelihood that auctions would exacerbate parity of access disputes between developed and developing countries. The article concludes with recommendations on how domestic and international policy making forums can improve administrative processes, including the brokering of financial inducements to developing nations to refrain from opposing registrations of developed nations, and implementing technologies that promote interference free sharing.","PeriodicalId":43790,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law","volume":"103 1","pages":"289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Equity and Efficiency Issues in the Management of Shared Global Radiocommunication Resources\",\"authors\":\"R. Frieden\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.360541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article will examine the merits of maintaining, revamping or abandoning the current administrative processes for managing international spectrum and satellite orbital slots. It will examine efficiency enhancing strategies including the use of competitive bidding and technological innovations that make it possible for more users with possibly different service requirements to share the same spectrum. Having considered the similarities and differences in satellites' spectrum use relative to earthbound uses, the article concludes that developing a market for orbital slots in lieu of the existing multilateral coordination and registration process would impose more costs and problems than benefits. The transborder technological characteristics of satellites raise sovereignty, equity and jurisdictional issues not triggered by economic and technological initiatives for terrestrial spectrum use. Accordingly, neither international, multilateral forums nor domestic policy making bodies can jettison the status quo and implement a competitive bidding model for all types of spectrum regardless of geographical coverage and transmission characteristics. In particular spectrum used for international satellite services and access to the orbital parking places used by satellites do not favor a complete migration to competitive bidding. Proponents of competitive bidding for spectrum have largely ignored the fact that many nations lie under a satellite transmission \\\"footprint,\\\" treaty commitments foreclose national or private ownership of outer space resources and the likelihood that auctions would exacerbate parity of access disputes between developed and developing countries. The article concludes with recommendations on how domestic and international policy making forums can improve administrative processes, including the brokering of financial inducements to developing nations to refrain from opposing registrations of developed nations, and implementing technologies that promote interference free sharing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.360541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.360541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文将探讨维持、改进或放弃目前管理国际频谱和卫星轨道槽的行政程序的优点。它将研究提高效率的策略,包括使用竞争性招标和技术创新,使更多可能有不同服务需求的用户共享同一频谱。在考虑了卫星频谱使用与地面使用的异同之后,文章的结论是,开发一个轨道槽市场来代替现有的多边协调和登记程序,将带来更多的成本和问题,而不是收益。卫星的跨界技术特点引起了主权、公平和管辖权问题,而这些问题并非由地面频谱使用的经济和技术举措引起的。因此,无论是国际、多边论坛还是国内政策制定机构,都不能抛弃现状,对所有类型的频谱实行不分地域覆盖和传输特性的竞争性招标模式。特别是用于国际卫星服务的频谱和卫星使用的轨道停车位的使用权不赞成完全转向竞争性招标。频谱竞标的支持者在很大程度上忽略了这样一个事实:许多国家都处于卫星传输的“足迹”之下,条约承诺排除了国家或私人对外层空间资源的所有权,拍卖可能会加剧发达国家和发展中国家之间的平等接入争端。文章最后就国内和国际政策制定论坛如何改善行政程序提出了建议,包括向发展中国家提供财政激励,使其避免反对发达国家的注册,以及实施促进无干扰共享的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing Equity and Efficiency Issues in the Management of Shared Global Radiocommunication Resources
This article will examine the merits of maintaining, revamping or abandoning the current administrative processes for managing international spectrum and satellite orbital slots. It will examine efficiency enhancing strategies including the use of competitive bidding and technological innovations that make it possible for more users with possibly different service requirements to share the same spectrum. Having considered the similarities and differences in satellites' spectrum use relative to earthbound uses, the article concludes that developing a market for orbital slots in lieu of the existing multilateral coordination and registration process would impose more costs and problems than benefits. The transborder technological characteristics of satellites raise sovereignty, equity and jurisdictional issues not triggered by economic and technological initiatives for terrestrial spectrum use. Accordingly, neither international, multilateral forums nor domestic policy making bodies can jettison the status quo and implement a competitive bidding model for all types of spectrum regardless of geographical coverage and transmission characteristics. In particular spectrum used for international satellite services and access to the orbital parking places used by satellites do not favor a complete migration to competitive bidding. Proponents of competitive bidding for spectrum have largely ignored the fact that many nations lie under a satellite transmission "footprint," treaty commitments foreclose national or private ownership of outer space resources and the likelihood that auctions would exacerbate parity of access disputes between developed and developing countries. The article concludes with recommendations on how domestic and international policy making forums can improve administrative processes, including the brokering of financial inducements to developing nations to refrain from opposing registrations of developed nations, and implementing technologies that promote interference free sharing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信