评论:民族志、批判与国家。关于“当代国家核心的财政人类学洞察”的几点思考

IF 0.6 Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law Pub Date : 2018-09-02 DOI:10.1080/07329113.2018.1558964

T. Bierschenk

{"title":"评论:民族志、批判与国家。关于“当代国家核心的财政人类学洞察”的几点思考","authors":"T. Bierschenk","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2018.1558964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This commentary explores the assets and liabilities of anthropology for the study of core functions of statehood (such as taxation) that increasingly become a matter of transnational negotiation and norm-making. It takes issue with some anthropologists’ counter-hegemonic self-positioning, calling upon anthropologists to think harder about the conditions and challenges of studying highly formalized expert knowledge and the epistemological reflection this requires.","PeriodicalId":44432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary: ethnography, critique and the state. Some thoughts on “fiscal anthropological insights into the heart of contemporary statehood”1\",\"authors\":\"T. Bierschenk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07329113.2018.1558964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This commentary explores the assets and liabilities of anthropology for the study of core functions of statehood (such as taxation) that increasingly become a matter of transnational negotiation and norm-making. It takes issue with some anthropologists’ counter-hegemonic self-positioning, calling upon anthropologists to think harder about the conditions and challenges of studying highly formalized expert knowledge and the epistemological reflection this requires.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1558964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1558964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇评论探讨了人类学在研究国家核心功能(如税收)方面的优势和劣势，这些核心功能日益成为跨国谈判和规范制定的问题。它对一些人类学家的反霸权自我定位提出了质疑，呼吁人类学家更努力地思考研究高度形式化的专家知识的条件和挑战，以及这需要的认识论反思。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Commentary: ethnography, critique and the state. Some thoughts on “fiscal anthropological insights into the heart of contemporary statehood”1

Abstract This commentary explores the assets and liabilities of anthropology for the study of core functions of statehood (such as taxation) that increasingly become a matter of transnational negotiation and norm-making. It takes issue with some anthropologists’ counter-hegemonic self-positioning, calling upon anthropologists to think harder about the conditions and challenges of studying highly formalized expert knowledge and the epistemological reflection this requires.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law LAW-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： As the pioneering journal in this field The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JLP) has a long history of publishing leading scholarship in the area of legal anthropology and legal pluralism and is the only international journal dedicated to the analysis of legal pluralism. It is a refereed scholarly journal with a genuinely global reach, publishing both empirical and theoretical contributions from a variety of disciplines, including (but not restricted to) Anthropology, Legal Studies, Development Studies and interdisciplinary studies. The JLP is devoted to scholarly writing and works that further current debates in the field of legal pluralism and to disseminating new and emerging findings from fieldwork. The Journal welcomes papers that make original contributions to understanding any aspect of legal pluralism and unofficial law, anywhere in the world, both in historic and contemporary contexts. We invite high-quality, original submissions that engage with this purpose.