薪水保护计划:少数银行与非少数银行的回应

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
James R. Barth, R. Cebula, Jiayi Xu
{"title":"薪水保护计划:少数银行与非少数银行的回应","authors":"James R. Barth, R. Cebula, Jiayi Xu","doi":"10.37625/abr.26.1.5-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are the first to empirically analyze whether the \"Guidance on Accessing Capital for Minority, Underserved, Veteran and Women-Owned Business Concerns\" (Guidance) program was successful. The program was implemented to promote the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans provided by Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs) in the second round compared to the first round of PPP. Using both loan-level data from the Small Business Administration (SBA) and balance-sheet-level data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), we obtain compelling empirical evidence indicating that MDIs issued relatively more PPP loans (scaled by institution assets) than non-MDIs in the second round. This finding is evidence that the goal of dedicated access for MDIs under the Guidance program was successful. It also enhances the understanding of the PPP lending program and the impact of the Federal Reserve PPP Liquidity Facility (PPPLF) in terms of the role played by MDIs.","PeriodicalId":34785,"journal":{"name":"American Business Review","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paycheck Protection Program: Minority vs. Non-Minority Bank Response\",\"authors\":\"James R. Barth, R. Cebula, Jiayi Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.37625/abr.26.1.5-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are the first to empirically analyze whether the \\\"Guidance on Accessing Capital for Minority, Underserved, Veteran and Women-Owned Business Concerns\\\" (Guidance) program was successful. The program was implemented to promote the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans provided by Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs) in the second round compared to the first round of PPP. Using both loan-level data from the Small Business Administration (SBA) and balance-sheet-level data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), we obtain compelling empirical evidence indicating that MDIs issued relatively more PPP loans (scaled by institution assets) than non-MDIs in the second round. This finding is evidence that the goal of dedicated access for MDIs under the Guidance program was successful. It also enhances the understanding of the PPP lending program and the impact of the Federal Reserve PPP Liquidity Facility (PPPLF) in terms of the role played by MDIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Business Review\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.26.1.5-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.26.1.5-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们率先对“少数民族、服务不足、退伍军人和妇女拥有的企业获得资金指导”(指导)项目是否成功进行了实证分析。实施该计划是为了促进少数族裔存款机构(mdi)在第二轮提供的工资保障计划(PPP)贷款,与第一轮PPP相比。使用来自小企业管理局(SBA)的贷款水平数据和联邦存款保险公司(FDIC)的资产负债表水平数据,我们获得了令人信服的经验证据,表明在第二轮中,MDIs发放的PPP贷款(按机构资产比例)相对于非MDIs更多。这一发现证明,指导计划下MDIs专用通道的目标是成功的。它还增强了对公私伙伴关系贷款计划和美联储公私伙伴关系流动性工具(PPPLF)在多边投资机构所起作用方面的影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Paycheck Protection Program: Minority vs. Non-Minority Bank Response
We are the first to empirically analyze whether the "Guidance on Accessing Capital for Minority, Underserved, Veteran and Women-Owned Business Concerns" (Guidance) program was successful. The program was implemented to promote the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans provided by Minority Depository Institutions (MDIs) in the second round compared to the first round of PPP. Using both loan-level data from the Small Business Administration (SBA) and balance-sheet-level data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), we obtain compelling empirical evidence indicating that MDIs issued relatively more PPP loans (scaled by institution assets) than non-MDIs in the second round. This finding is evidence that the goal of dedicated access for MDIs under the Guidance program was successful. It also enhances the understanding of the PPP lending program and the impact of the Federal Reserve PPP Liquidity Facility (PPPLF) in terms of the role played by MDIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Business Review
American Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信