{"title":"穆罕:一个哈拉基术语的兴衰","authors":"yoel Kretzmer-Raziel","doi":"10.1353/hbr.2020.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The term מוכן ‘prepared’ plays a central role in Tannaitic Sabbath law. This article reviews the development of this term from linguistic, exegetical, and normative points of view. In Mishnaic Hebrew, מוכן and its negative form אינו מן המוכן are archaic forms derived through nominalization from Exod 16:5. This linguistic legacy, shared with the Damascus Document, went through a process of reconceptualization in Tannaitic law. While the term remained fixed, its normative consequences were further developed and מוכן became a pivotal concept in the Tannaitic laws of consumption and handling. Although it would seem that the rise and decline of the term מוכן could be explained through the conceptual transformations of the Tannaitic and Amoraic eras, I argue that the conceptual and linguistic changes do not coincide and suggest alternative explanations for the emergence and eventual marginalization of .מוכן","PeriodicalId":35110,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew Studies","volume":"81 1","pages":"259 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mukhan: The Rise and Fall of a Halakic Term\",\"authors\":\"yoel Kretzmer-Raziel\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hbr.2020.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The term מוכן ‘prepared’ plays a central role in Tannaitic Sabbath law. This article reviews the development of this term from linguistic, exegetical, and normative points of view. In Mishnaic Hebrew, מוכן and its negative form אינו מן המוכן are archaic forms derived through nominalization from Exod 16:5. This linguistic legacy, shared with the Damascus Document, went through a process of reconceptualization in Tannaitic law. While the term remained fixed, its normative consequences were further developed and מוכן became a pivotal concept in the Tannaitic laws of consumption and handling. Although it would seem that the rise and decline of the term מוכן could be explained through the conceptual transformations of the Tannaitic and Amoraic eras, I argue that the conceptual and linguistic changes do not coincide and suggest alternative explanations for the emergence and eventual marginalization of .מוכן\",\"PeriodicalId\":35110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"259 - 276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2020.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2020.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:The term מוכן ‘prepared’ plays a central role in Tannaitic Sabbath law. This article reviews the development of this term from linguistic, exegetical, and normative points of view. In Mishnaic Hebrew, מוכן and its negative form אינו מן המוכן are archaic forms derived through nominalization from Exod 16:5. This linguistic legacy, shared with the Damascus Document, went through a process of reconceptualization in Tannaitic law. While the term remained fixed, its normative consequences were further developed and מוכן became a pivotal concept in the Tannaitic laws of consumption and handling. Although it would seem that the rise and decline of the term מוכן could be explained through the conceptual transformations of the Tannaitic and Amoraic eras, I argue that the conceptual and linguistic changes do not coincide and suggest alternative explanations for the emergence and eventual marginalization of .מוכן