从欧洲人权法院判例看与专业人员办公室相关的“家”概念

A. Seucan
{"title":"从欧洲人权法院判例看与专业人员办公室相关的“家”概念","authors":"A. Seucan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2658046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scientific paper covers specific aspects of the concept of home in connection to a professional`s office, according to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. It focuses on two specific cases (Niemietz v. Germany and Societe Colas Est and Others v. France). The concept of home is usually related to individuals/natural persons and their private issues. What happens if there is no clear separation between business and private life? Can legal persons claim the same protection as individuals, according to the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms?","PeriodicalId":10506,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Law School","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of 'Home' in Relation to a Professional's Office, According to the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights\",\"authors\":\"A. Seucan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2658046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scientific paper covers specific aspects of the concept of home in connection to a professional`s office, according to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. It focuses on two specific cases (Niemietz v. Germany and Societe Colas Est and Others v. France). The concept of home is usually related to individuals/natural persons and their private issues. What happens if there is no clear separation between business and private life? Can legal persons claim the same protection as individuals, according to the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms?\",\"PeriodicalId\":10506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia Law School\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia Law School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2658046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2658046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据欧洲人权法院的判例,这篇科学论文涵盖了与专业人员办公室有关的家概念的具体方面。它侧重于两个具体案例(Niemietz诉德国和Societe Colas Est and Others诉法国)。家的概念通常与个人/自然人和他们的私人问题有关。如果商业和私人生活没有明确的界限,会发生什么?根据《保护人权和基本自由公约》的规定,法人是否可以要求与个人同样的保护?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Concept of 'Home' in Relation to a Professional's Office, According to the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
The scientific paper covers specific aspects of the concept of home in connection to a professional`s office, according to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. It focuses on two specific cases (Niemietz v. Germany and Societe Colas Est and Others v. France). The concept of home is usually related to individuals/natural persons and their private issues. What happens if there is no clear separation between business and private life? Can legal persons claim the same protection as individuals, according to the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信