第七章现在保护LGBTQ员工:雇主从哪里开始

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW
Anthony L. McMullen, Nicholas Williams
{"title":"第七章现在保护LGBTQ员工:雇主从哪里开始","authors":"Anthony L. McMullen, Nicholas Williams","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3655914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Title VII explicitly prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, and the Supreme Court explained that one cannot discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity without discriminating on the basis of sex. This ruling will have implications on workplaces across the country, particularly those in states previously without those protections. This article discusses the three cases decided by the Supreme Court, summarizes the Supreme Court’s opinion, and provides implications for employers and employees across the United States.","PeriodicalId":42250,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law","volume":"434 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Title VII Now Protects LGBTQ Employees: Where Employers Go from Here\",\"authors\":\"Anthony L. McMullen, Nicholas Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3655914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Title VII explicitly prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, and the Supreme Court explained that one cannot discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity without discriminating on the basis of sex. This ruling will have implications on workplaces across the country, particularly those in states previously without those protections. This article discusses the three cases decided by the Supreme Court, summarizes the Supreme Court’s opinion, and provides implications for employers and employees across the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law\",\"volume\":\"434 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3655914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Discrimination and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3655914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年6月15日,美国最高法院裁定,《民权法案》第七章禁止基于性取向和性别认同的歧视。宪法第七章明确禁止基于性别的歧视,大法院解释说,如果没有基于性别的歧视,就不能基于性取向和性别认同进行歧视。这一裁决将对全国各地的工作场所产生影响,特别是那些以前没有这些保护的州。本文讨论了最高法院判决的三个案件,总结了最高法院的意见,并为美国的雇主和雇员提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Title VII Now Protects LGBTQ Employees: Where Employers Go from Here
On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Title VII explicitly prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, and the Supreme Court explained that one cannot discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity without discriminating on the basis of sex. This ruling will have implications on workplaces across the country, particularly those in states previously without those protections. This article discusses the three cases decided by the Supreme Court, summarizes the Supreme Court’s opinion, and provides implications for employers and employees across the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信