聚类分析探讨嗜酸性肉芽肿病合并多血管炎的临床亚表型。

Q2 Medicine
Emma Rubenstein, C. Maldini, A. Vaglio, F. Bello, J. Bremer, F. Moosig, P. Bottero, Alberto Pesci, R. Sinico, J. Grosskreutz, Claudia Feder, D. Saadoun, Giorgio Trivioli, F. Maritati, B. Rewerska, W. Szczeklik, P. Fraticelli, Giuseppe Guida, G. Gregorini, G. Moroncini, B. Hellmich, J. Zwerina, Matthieu Resche-Rigon, G. Emmi, T. Neumann, A. Mahr
{"title":"聚类分析探讨嗜酸性肉芽肿病合并多血管炎的临床亚表型。","authors":"Emma Rubenstein, C. Maldini, A. Vaglio, F. Bello, J. Bremer, F. Moosig, P. Bottero, Alberto Pesci, R. Sinico, J. Grosskreutz, Claudia Feder, D. Saadoun, Giorgio Trivioli, F. Maritati, B. Rewerska, W. Szczeklik, P. Fraticelli, Giuseppe Guida, G. Gregorini, G. Moroncini, B. Hellmich, J. Zwerina, Matthieu Resche-Rigon, G. Emmi, T. Neumann, A. Mahr","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2022-0325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nPrevious studies suggested that distinct phenotypes of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) could be determined by presence or absence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), reflecting predominant vasculitic or eosinophilic processes, respectively. This study explored whether ANCA-based clusters or other clusters can be identified in EGPA.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study used standardized data of 15 European centers for patients with EGPA fulfilling widely accepted classification criteria. We used multiple correspondence analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis, and a decision tree model. The main model included 10 clinical variables (musculoskeletal, mucocutaneous, ophthalmological, ENT, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, central or peripheral neurological involvement); a second model also included ANCA results.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe analyses included 489 patients diagnosed in 1984-2015. ANCA were detected in 37.2% of patients, mostly P-ANCA (85.4%) and/or anti-myeloperoxidase (87.0%). Compared with ANCA-negative patients, those with ANCA had more renal (P<0.001) and peripheral neurological involvement (P=0.04), fewer cardiovascular signs (P<0.001) and fewer biopsies with eosinophilic tissue infiltrates (P=0.001). The cluster analyses generated four (model without ANCA) and five clusters (model with ANCA). Both models identified three identical clusters of 34, 39 and 40 patients according to the presence or absence of ENT, CNS and ophthalmological involvement. Peripheral neurological and cardiovascular involvement were not predictive characteristics.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nAlthough reinforcing the known association of ANCA status with clinical manifestations, cluster analysis does not support a complete separation of EGPA in ANCA-positive and -negative subsets. Collectively, these data indicate that EGPA should be regarded as a phenotypic spectrum rather than a dichotomous disease.","PeriodicalId":35278,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cluster Analysis To Explore Clinical Subphenotypes Of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss).\",\"authors\":\"Emma Rubenstein, C. Maldini, A. Vaglio, F. Bello, J. Bremer, F. Moosig, P. Bottero, Alberto Pesci, R. Sinico, J. Grosskreutz, Claudia Feder, D. Saadoun, Giorgio Trivioli, F. Maritati, B. Rewerska, W. Szczeklik, P. Fraticelli, Giuseppe Guida, G. Gregorini, G. Moroncini, B. Hellmich, J. Zwerina, Matthieu Resche-Rigon, G. Emmi, T. Neumann, A. Mahr\",\"doi\":\"10.3899/jrheum.2022-0325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nPrevious studies suggested that distinct phenotypes of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) could be determined by presence or absence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), reflecting predominant vasculitic or eosinophilic processes, respectively. This study explored whether ANCA-based clusters or other clusters can be identified in EGPA.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThis study used standardized data of 15 European centers for patients with EGPA fulfilling widely accepted classification criteria. We used multiple correspondence analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis, and a decision tree model. The main model included 10 clinical variables (musculoskeletal, mucocutaneous, ophthalmological, ENT, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, central or peripheral neurological involvement); a second model also included ANCA results.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe analyses included 489 patients diagnosed in 1984-2015. ANCA were detected in 37.2% of patients, mostly P-ANCA (85.4%) and/or anti-myeloperoxidase (87.0%). Compared with ANCA-negative patients, those with ANCA had more renal (P<0.001) and peripheral neurological involvement (P=0.04), fewer cardiovascular signs (P<0.001) and fewer biopsies with eosinophilic tissue infiltrates (P=0.001). The cluster analyses generated four (model without ANCA) and five clusters (model with ANCA). Both models identified three identical clusters of 34, 39 and 40 patients according to the presence or absence of ENT, CNS and ophthalmological involvement. Peripheral neurological and cardiovascular involvement were not predictive characteristics.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nAlthough reinforcing the known association of ANCA status with clinical manifestations, cluster analysis does not support a complete separation of EGPA in ANCA-positive and -negative subsets. Collectively, these data indicate that EGPA should be regarded as a phenotypic spectrum rather than a dichotomous disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2022-0325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2022-0325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的以前的研究表明,嗜酸性肉芽肿病合并多血管炎(EGPA)的不同表型可以通过抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)的存在或不存在来确定,分别反映了主要的血管增生过程或嗜酸性过程。本研究探讨了在EGPA中是否可以识别基于anca的簇或其他簇。方法本研究采用欧洲15个EGPA中心的标准化数据,这些数据符合广泛接受的分类标准。我们使用了多重对应分析、层次聚类分析和决策树模型。主要模型包括10个临床变量(肌肉骨骼、粘膜皮肤、眼科、耳鼻喉科、心血管、肺部、胃肠道、肾脏、中枢或周围神经受累);第二个模型也包括了ANCA的结果。结果纳入1984-2015年诊断的489例患者。37.2%的患者检测到ANCA,主要是P-ANCA(85.4%)和/或抗髓过氧化物酶(87.0%)。与ANCA阴性患者相比,ANCA患者有更多的肾脏(P<0.001)和周围神经受累(P=0.04),更少的心血管征象(P<0.001)和更少的嗜酸性组织浸润活检(P=0.001)。聚类分析产生了4个(没有ANCA的模型)和5个(有ANCA的模型)。根据耳鼻喉科、中枢神经系统和眼科的受累与否,两种模型分别确定了34、39和40个相同的患者群。外周神经系统和心血管受累不是预测特征。结论虽然强化了已知的ANCA状态与临床表现的关联,但聚类分析并不支持EGPA在ANCA阳性和阴性亚群中的完全分离。总的来说,这些数据表明EGPA应被视为一种表型谱,而不是一种二分法疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cluster Analysis To Explore Clinical Subphenotypes Of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss).
OBJECTIVE Previous studies suggested that distinct phenotypes of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) could be determined by presence or absence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), reflecting predominant vasculitic or eosinophilic processes, respectively. This study explored whether ANCA-based clusters or other clusters can be identified in EGPA. METHODS This study used standardized data of 15 European centers for patients with EGPA fulfilling widely accepted classification criteria. We used multiple correspondence analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis, and a decision tree model. The main model included 10 clinical variables (musculoskeletal, mucocutaneous, ophthalmological, ENT, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, central or peripheral neurological involvement); a second model also included ANCA results. RESULTS The analyses included 489 patients diagnosed in 1984-2015. ANCA were detected in 37.2% of patients, mostly P-ANCA (85.4%) and/or anti-myeloperoxidase (87.0%). Compared with ANCA-negative patients, those with ANCA had more renal (P<0.001) and peripheral neurological involvement (P=0.04), fewer cardiovascular signs (P<0.001) and fewer biopsies with eosinophilic tissue infiltrates (P=0.001). The cluster analyses generated four (model without ANCA) and five clusters (model with ANCA). Both models identified three identical clusters of 34, 39 and 40 patients according to the presence or absence of ENT, CNS and ophthalmological involvement. Peripheral neurological and cardiovascular involvement were not predictive characteristics. CONCLUSION Although reinforcing the known association of ANCA status with clinical manifestations, cluster analysis does not support a complete separation of EGPA in ANCA-positive and -negative subsets. Collectively, these data indicate that EGPA should be regarded as a phenotypic spectrum rather than a dichotomous disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Duncan A. Gordon, The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 36 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信