正义是俄罗斯刑事诉讼中法律面前和法院面前人人平等的首要基础

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
V. Azarov
{"title":"正义是俄罗斯刑事诉讼中法律面前和法院面前人人平等的首要基础","authors":"V. Azarov","doi":"10.17223/22253513/43/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of the historiographic studies of the principle of equality of all before the law and court in the criminal procedural legislation of Russia. Considering the importance of the above principle for the formation of the authority of the judiciary, the author substantiates its fundamental role in the assessment by the population of the country of the presence and reflection in the law of justice as the core category of the genotype of the Russian nation. The positions of opponents of the legislative decision about the reflection of the category of «objective truth» in the text of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are analyzed, the inconsistency and even the perniciousness of introducing the artificial concept of «legal justice» into the theory and practice are shown. The comparative characteristics of the textual expression of the principle of equality of all before the law and court in various legislative acts of the Russian Federation are given. On this basis, the preferred wording of this principle in the Criminal Procedure Code has been formulated. The segments of the content of the concept of justice in criminal proceedings are interpreted. From the standpoint of social justice, the redundancy of the presence in Chapter 52 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of a large detachment of representatives of all branches of state power of Russia, endowed with additional privileges in criminal proceedings, is shown and commented on. The directions of changing the procedure for criminal proceedings against state and municipal employees, as well as the limits of their inviolability in the sphere of activity of criminal justice bodies, have been identified and substantiated. The evidence for the expediency of the direct participation of federal judges of courts of general jurisdiction in resolving the issues of restriction, suspension and deprivation of immunity of state and municipal employees for their criminal prosecution is given. The history and causes are studied, the initiators and conditions for the creation of the above section of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are revealed, an assessment of its compliance with the typology and traditional ideology of the national criminal procedure is given. The most suitable options for legislative solutions that allow minimizing reputational losses for all branches of state power in cases of bringing their representatives to criminal liability are discussed and selected. A scheme of legislative work to optimize the content of the above section of the Criminal Procedure Code and to strengthen the principle of equality of all before the law and court and justice in the sphere of activity of criminal justice bodies is proposed and substantiated.","PeriodicalId":41435,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justice as the primary basis of equality of all before the law and court in the criminal procedure of Russia\",\"authors\":\"V. Azarov\",\"doi\":\"10.17223/22253513/43/1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the results of the historiographic studies of the principle of equality of all before the law and court in the criminal procedural legislation of Russia. Considering the importance of the above principle for the formation of the authority of the judiciary, the author substantiates its fundamental role in the assessment by the population of the country of the presence and reflection in the law of justice as the core category of the genotype of the Russian nation. The positions of opponents of the legislative decision about the reflection of the category of «objective truth» in the text of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are analyzed, the inconsistency and even the perniciousness of introducing the artificial concept of «legal justice» into the theory and practice are shown. The comparative characteristics of the textual expression of the principle of equality of all before the law and court in various legislative acts of the Russian Federation are given. On this basis, the preferred wording of this principle in the Criminal Procedure Code has been formulated. The segments of the content of the concept of justice in criminal proceedings are interpreted. From the standpoint of social justice, the redundancy of the presence in Chapter 52 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of a large detachment of representatives of all branches of state power of Russia, endowed with additional privileges in criminal proceedings, is shown and commented on. The directions of changing the procedure for criminal proceedings against state and municipal employees, as well as the limits of their inviolability in the sphere of activity of criminal justice bodies, have been identified and substantiated. The evidence for the expediency of the direct participation of federal judges of courts of general jurisdiction in resolving the issues of restriction, suspension and deprivation of immunity of state and municipal employees for their criminal prosecution is given. The history and causes are studied, the initiators and conditions for the creation of the above section of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are revealed, an assessment of its compliance with the typology and traditional ideology of the national criminal procedure is given. The most suitable options for legislative solutions that allow minimizing reputational losses for all branches of state power in cases of bringing their representatives to criminal liability are discussed and selected. A scheme of legislative work to optimize the content of the above section of the Criminal Procedure Code and to strengthen the principle of equality of all before the law and court and justice in the sphere of activity of criminal justice bodies is proposed and substantiated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/43/1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta-Pravo-Tomsk State University Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/43/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了对俄罗斯刑事诉讼立法中法律面前和法院面前人人平等原则进行史学研究的结果。考虑到上述原则对司法权威形成的重要性,作者证实了其在国家人口对作为俄罗斯民族基因型核心类别的司法法的存在和反映的评估中的基本作用。分析了俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法文本中关于反映“客观真理”范畴的立法决定的反对者的立场,揭示了在理论和实践中引入“法律正义”这一人为概念的不一致性乃至危害性。对俄罗斯联邦各种立法文件中法律面前和法院面前人人平等原则的文本表达的比较特点进行了分析。在此基础上,拟定了《刑事诉讼法》对这一原则的优选措词。对刑事诉讼中正义概念的部分内容进行了解释。从社会正义的观点出发,对《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》第52章中存在的大量俄罗斯国家权力各部门的代表在刑事诉讼中享有额外特权的冗余进行了说明和评论。已经确定并证实了改变对州和市政雇员的刑事诉讼程序的指示,以及他们在刑事司法机构活动范围内不可侵犯的限度。有证据表明,一般管辖法院的联邦法官直接参与解决限制、暂停和剥夺州和市政雇员刑事起诉豁免权的问题是权宜之计。研究了历史和原因,揭示了《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》上述部分产生的原因和条件,并对其符合国家刑事诉讼法的类型和传统意识形态进行了评估。讨论和选择了最合适的立法解决方案,以便在使其代表承担刑事责任的情况下最大限度地减少所有国家权力部门的声誉损失。提出了一项立法工作计划,以优化《刑事诉讼法》上述部分的内容,并在刑事司法机构的活动范围内加强法律、法院和司法面前人人平等的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Justice as the primary basis of equality of all before the law and court in the criminal procedure of Russia
The article presents the results of the historiographic studies of the principle of equality of all before the law and court in the criminal procedural legislation of Russia. Considering the importance of the above principle for the formation of the authority of the judiciary, the author substantiates its fundamental role in the assessment by the population of the country of the presence and reflection in the law of justice as the core category of the genotype of the Russian nation. The positions of opponents of the legislative decision about the reflection of the category of «objective truth» in the text of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are analyzed, the inconsistency and even the perniciousness of introducing the artificial concept of «legal justice» into the theory and practice are shown. The comparative characteristics of the textual expression of the principle of equality of all before the law and court in various legislative acts of the Russian Federation are given. On this basis, the preferred wording of this principle in the Criminal Procedure Code has been formulated. The segments of the content of the concept of justice in criminal proceedings are interpreted. From the standpoint of social justice, the redundancy of the presence in Chapter 52 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of a large detachment of representatives of all branches of state power of Russia, endowed with additional privileges in criminal proceedings, is shown and commented on. The directions of changing the procedure for criminal proceedings against state and municipal employees, as well as the limits of their inviolability in the sphere of activity of criminal justice bodies, have been identified and substantiated. The evidence for the expediency of the direct participation of federal judges of courts of general jurisdiction in resolving the issues of restriction, suspension and deprivation of immunity of state and municipal employees for their criminal prosecution is given. The history and causes are studied, the initiators and conditions for the creation of the above section of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are revealed, an assessment of its compliance with the typology and traditional ideology of the national criminal procedure is given. The most suitable options for legislative solutions that allow minimizing reputational losses for all branches of state power in cases of bringing their representatives to criminal liability are discussed and selected. A scheme of legislative work to optimize the content of the above section of the Criminal Procedure Code and to strengthen the principle of equality of all before the law and court and justice in the sphere of activity of criminal justice bodies is proposed and substantiated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信