中央集权国家的多层次治理?来自中国领土改革后的证据

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
L. Liao, C. Shi
{"title":"中央集权国家的多层次治理?来自中国领土改革后的证据","authors":"L. Liao, C. Shi","doi":"10.4335/20.1.1-26(2022)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China has long been considered a centralized country. Over the last 30 years, several reforms have gradually transferred important powers to local levels, particularly counties. The article analyzes this evolution based on a field study in two provinces, Zhejiang and Sichuan. The hypothesis is that the transfer of initiatives has become a new way of ‘steering’ counties’ identities in China. This article is based on an analysis from two perspectives. The first is an institutional perspective concerning financial, administrative, and political reform in China; the second is a neo-institutional perspective that examines counties’ identities and the role county-level actors play in territorial development and intergovernmental relations within their provinces.","PeriodicalId":51875,"journal":{"name":"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-level Governance in Centralized State? Evidence from China after the Territorial Reforms\",\"authors\":\"L. Liao, C. Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.4335/20.1.1-26(2022)\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"China has long been considered a centralized country. Over the last 30 years, several reforms have gradually transferred important powers to local levels, particularly counties. The article analyzes this evolution based on a field study in two provinces, Zhejiang and Sichuan. The hypothesis is that the transfer of initiatives has become a new way of ‘steering’ counties’ identities in China. This article is based on an analysis from two perspectives. The first is an institutional perspective concerning financial, administrative, and political reform in China; the second is a neo-institutional perspective that examines counties’ identities and the role county-level actors play in territorial development and intergovernmental relations within their provinces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4335/20.1.1-26(2022)\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4335/20.1.1-26(2022)","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国一直被认为是一个中央集权的国家。在过去的30年里,几项改革逐渐将重要的权力转移到地方,特别是县。本文通过对浙江和四川两省的实地考察,分析了这一演变过程。假设是,主动权的转移已经成为中国“引导”县身份的一种新方式。本文主要从两个角度进行分析。第一个是关于中国财政、行政和政治改革的制度视角;第二个是一个新制度的视角,考察了县的身份和县级行为者在其省内的领土发展和政府间关系中所扮演的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-level Governance in Centralized State? Evidence from China after the Territorial Reforms
China has long been considered a centralized country. Over the last 30 years, several reforms have gradually transferred important powers to local levels, particularly counties. The article analyzes this evolution based on a field study in two provinces, Zhejiang and Sichuan. The hypothesis is that the transfer of initiatives has become a new way of ‘steering’ counties’ identities in China. This article is based on an analysis from two perspectives. The first is an institutional perspective concerning financial, administrative, and political reform in China; the second is a neo-institutional perspective that examines counties’ identities and the role county-level actors play in territorial development and intergovernmental relations within their provinces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信