解释方法的有效性:框架和创新

Q1 Social Sciences

Annals of the International Communication Association Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/23808985.2020.1792795

M. Dutta, Satveer Kaur, Phoebe Elers

{"title":"解释方法的有效性:框架和创新","authors":"M. Dutta, Satveer Kaur, Phoebe Elers","doi":"10.1080/23808985.2020.1792795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this review essay, we examine the various threads, debates, and dialogues around valildity in interpretive metods. We address the ways in which the question of validity have emerged in the different areas of interpretive social sciences. We then delve into future directions for conversations on validity in the interpretive social sciences. The essay wraps up by suggesting a radical politics that inverts the reductionist thread of communication, instead suggesting radical paradigm-shifting registers for conversations on the quality of interpretive accounts.","PeriodicalId":36859,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the International Communication Association","volume":"70 1","pages":"185 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity in interpretive methods: frameworks and innovations\",\"authors\":\"M. Dutta, Satveer Kaur, Phoebe Elers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23808985.2020.1792795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this review essay, we examine the various threads, debates, and dialogues around valildity in interpretive metods. We address the ways in which the question of validity have emerged in the different areas of interpretive social sciences. We then delve into future directions for conversations on validity in the interpretive social sciences. The essay wraps up by suggesting a radical politics that inverts the reductionist thread of communication, instead suggesting radical paradigm-shifting registers for conversations on the quality of interpretive accounts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the International Communication Association\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"185 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the International Communication Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the International Communication Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇综述文章中，我们研究了关于解释方法有效性的各种线索、辩论和对话。我们讨论了在解释性社会科学的不同领域中有效性问题出现的方式。然后，我们将深入探讨解释性社会科学中关于有效性的对话的未来方向。文章最后提出了一种激进的政治观点，这种观点颠覆了还原论的交流思路，而是提出了一种激进的范式转换寄存器，用于讨论解释账户的质量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Validity in interpretive methods: frameworks and innovations

ABSTRACT In this review essay, we examine the various threads, debates, and dialogues around valildity in interpretive metods. We address the ways in which the question of validity have emerged in the different areas of interpretive social sciences. We then delve into future directions for conversations on validity in the interpretive social sciences. The essay wraps up by suggesting a radical politics that inverts the reductionist thread of communication, instead suggesting radical paradigm-shifting registers for conversations on the quality of interpretive accounts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Annals of the International Communication Association Social Sciences-Communication

CiteScore

10.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量