摘要2627:美国、加拿大和澳大利亚主要外科手术的社会经济地位和使用情况

Hilary Pang, K. Chalmers, B. Landon, A. Elshaug, J. Matelski, V. Ling, M. Krzyzanowska, G. Kulkarni, B. Erickson, P. Cram
{"title":"摘要2627:美国、加拿大和澳大利亚主要外科手术的社会经济地位和使用情况","authors":"Hilary Pang, K. Chalmers, B. Landon, A. Elshaug, J. Matelski, V. Ling, M. Krzyzanowska, G. Kulkarni, B. Erickson, P. Cram","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-2627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to compare the utilization rates of three organ resection surgeries, predominantly indicated for the treatment of cancer, in the US, Canada, and Australia, and compare rates between residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Methods: We used population-based administrative data to identify all adults aged ≥18 years hospitalized for pancreatectomy (PX), radical prostatectomy (RP) and nephrectomy (NX) between 2011-2016 (New York, USA), 2011-2018 (Ontario, Canada), and 2013-2018 (New South Wales, Australia). We linked each patient9s zip-code of residence to 2016 census data to ascertain neighborhood income. We compared utilization rates for each procedure in each jurisdiction in aggregate and by neighborhood income quintile. Primary outcomes were: 1) each jurisdictions9 per-capita overall, age-, and sex-standardized utilization rates for each procedure; and 2) utilization rates amongst residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Results: Sociodemographics were similar across jurisdictions; patients in New South Wales were older for all procedures. New York hospitals were significantly likelier to perform each of the three procedures compared to Ontario and New South Wales (all P Conclusions: Utilization rates of PX, RP, and NX were significantly higher in New York and New South Wales than in Ontario. Rich-poor surgical utilization differences were significantly larger in New York and New South Wales and significantly smaller in Ontario. These findings suggest that income-based disparities are larger in US and Australian jurisdictions than those Canadian, and highlight the possible trade-offs of equity and access in cancer care of different countries. Citation Format: Hilary Pang, Kelsey Chalmers, Bruce Landon, Adam Elshaug, John Matelski, Vicki Ling, Monika K. Krzyzanowska, Girish Kulkarni, Bradley A. Erickson, Peter Cram. Socioeconomic status and utilization of major surgical procedures in the United States, Canada, and Australia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2627.","PeriodicalId":21579,"journal":{"name":"Science and Health Policy","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract 2627: Socioeconomic status and utilization of major surgical procedures in the United States, Canada, and Australia\",\"authors\":\"Hilary Pang, K. Chalmers, B. Landon, A. Elshaug, J. Matelski, V. Ling, M. Krzyzanowska, G. Kulkarni, B. Erickson, P. Cram\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-2627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study aimed to compare the utilization rates of three organ resection surgeries, predominantly indicated for the treatment of cancer, in the US, Canada, and Australia, and compare rates between residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Methods: We used population-based administrative data to identify all adults aged ≥18 years hospitalized for pancreatectomy (PX), radical prostatectomy (RP) and nephrectomy (NX) between 2011-2016 (New York, USA), 2011-2018 (Ontario, Canada), and 2013-2018 (New South Wales, Australia). We linked each patient9s zip-code of residence to 2016 census data to ascertain neighborhood income. We compared utilization rates for each procedure in each jurisdiction in aggregate and by neighborhood income quintile. Primary outcomes were: 1) each jurisdictions9 per-capita overall, age-, and sex-standardized utilization rates for each procedure; and 2) utilization rates amongst residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Results: Sociodemographics were similar across jurisdictions; patients in New South Wales were older for all procedures. New York hospitals were significantly likelier to perform each of the three procedures compared to Ontario and New South Wales (all P Conclusions: Utilization rates of PX, RP, and NX were significantly higher in New York and New South Wales than in Ontario. Rich-poor surgical utilization differences were significantly larger in New York and New South Wales and significantly smaller in Ontario. These findings suggest that income-based disparities are larger in US and Australian jurisdictions than those Canadian, and highlight the possible trade-offs of equity and access in cancer care of different countries. Citation Format: Hilary Pang, Kelsey Chalmers, Bruce Landon, Adam Elshaug, John Matelski, Vicki Ling, Monika K. Krzyzanowska, Girish Kulkarni, Bradley A. Erickson, Peter Cram. Socioeconomic status and utilization of major surgical procedures in the United States, Canada, and Australia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2627.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-2627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2021-2627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较美国、加拿大和澳大利亚三种主要用于治疗癌症的器官切除手术的使用率,并比较低收入和高收入社区居民的使用率。方法:我们使用基于人群的管理数据来确定2011-2016年(美国纽约)、2011-2018年(加拿大安大略省)和2013-2018年(澳大利亚新南威尔士州)期间住院接受胰腺切除术(PX)、根治性前列腺切除术(RP)和肾切除术(NX)的所有年龄≥18岁的成年人。我们将每位患者的居住邮政编码与2016年人口普查数据联系起来,以确定社区收入。我们比较了每个司法管辖区的每个程序的总体利用率和社区收入五分之一。主要结果是:1)每个司法管辖区每个手术的人均总体、年龄和性别标准化利用率;2)低收入和高收入社区居民的使用率。结果:各司法管辖区的社会人口统计学相似;新南威尔士州的患者在所有手术中都年龄较大。与安大略省和新南威尔士州相比,纽约医院更有可能实施这三种手术(所有P结论:PX、RP和NX的使用率在纽约和新南威尔士州显著高于安大略省。在纽约和新南威尔士州,贫富手术利用率差异明显较大,而在安大略则明显较小。这些发现表明,在美国和澳大利亚的司法管辖区,基于收入的差距比加拿大更大,并突出了不同国家在癌症治疗方面公平和可及性的可能权衡。引用格式:Hilary Pang, Kelsey Chalmers, Bruce Landon, Adam Elshaug, John Matelski, Vicki Ling, Monika K. Krzyzanowska, Girish Kulkarni, Bradley A. Erickson, Peter Cram。美国、加拿大和澳大利亚主要外科手术的社会经济地位和应用[摘要]。见:美国癌症研究协会2021年年会论文集;2021年4月10日至15日和5月17日至21日。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2021;81(13 -增刊):2627。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract 2627: Socioeconomic status and utilization of major surgical procedures in the United States, Canada, and Australia
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the utilization rates of three organ resection surgeries, predominantly indicated for the treatment of cancer, in the US, Canada, and Australia, and compare rates between residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Methods: We used population-based administrative data to identify all adults aged ≥18 years hospitalized for pancreatectomy (PX), radical prostatectomy (RP) and nephrectomy (NX) between 2011-2016 (New York, USA), 2011-2018 (Ontario, Canada), and 2013-2018 (New South Wales, Australia). We linked each patient9s zip-code of residence to 2016 census data to ascertain neighborhood income. We compared utilization rates for each procedure in each jurisdiction in aggregate and by neighborhood income quintile. Primary outcomes were: 1) each jurisdictions9 per-capita overall, age-, and sex-standardized utilization rates for each procedure; and 2) utilization rates amongst residents of lower- and higher-income neighborhoods. Results: Sociodemographics were similar across jurisdictions; patients in New South Wales were older for all procedures. New York hospitals were significantly likelier to perform each of the three procedures compared to Ontario and New South Wales (all P Conclusions: Utilization rates of PX, RP, and NX were significantly higher in New York and New South Wales than in Ontario. Rich-poor surgical utilization differences were significantly larger in New York and New South Wales and significantly smaller in Ontario. These findings suggest that income-based disparities are larger in US and Australian jurisdictions than those Canadian, and highlight the possible trade-offs of equity and access in cancer care of different countries. Citation Format: Hilary Pang, Kelsey Chalmers, Bruce Landon, Adam Elshaug, John Matelski, Vicki Ling, Monika K. Krzyzanowska, Girish Kulkarni, Bradley A. Erickson, Peter Cram. Socioeconomic status and utilization of major surgical procedures in the United States, Canada, and Australia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2627.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信