这还正常吗?对时序异常的定义进行测试

IF 0.5 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Benjamin Binder, Mihail Asavoae, Belgacem Ben Hedia, F. Brandner, M. Jan
{"title":"这还正常吗?对时序异常的定义进行测试","authors":"Benjamin Binder, Mihail Asavoae, Belgacem Ben Hedia, F. Brandner, M. Jan","doi":"10.1109/RTCSA52859.2021.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correctness is an important concern during the development of real-time systems. In addition to the functional correctness, the timing behavior is often formally verified in order to ensure that correct results are delivered in-time for all possible execution conditions. The timing behavior of real-time software is thus often validated through a rigorous timing analysis that aims at determining the worst-case execution time.Timing anomalies present a major obstacle during the validation of timing properties on modern computer platforms. Out-of-order execution and concurrent accesses to shared resources may sometimes lead to – at first sight – surprising timing behavior. Several (semi-)formal definitions have been proposed in the literature in order to capture such situations. However, as we present in this work, none of the existing definitions appears to be precise enough to be systematically used for detecting timing anomalies in modern processors with out-of-order execution.","PeriodicalId":38446,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Embedded and Real-Time Communication Systems (IJERTCS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"139-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is This Still Normal? Putting Definitions of Timing Anomalies to the Test\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Binder, Mihail Asavoae, Belgacem Ben Hedia, F. Brandner, M. Jan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RTCSA52859.2021.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correctness is an important concern during the development of real-time systems. In addition to the functional correctness, the timing behavior is often formally verified in order to ensure that correct results are delivered in-time for all possible execution conditions. The timing behavior of real-time software is thus often validated through a rigorous timing analysis that aims at determining the worst-case execution time.Timing anomalies present a major obstacle during the validation of timing properties on modern computer platforms. Out-of-order execution and concurrent accesses to shared resources may sometimes lead to – at first sight – surprising timing behavior. Several (semi-)formal definitions have been proposed in the literature in order to capture such situations. However, as we present in this work, none of the existing definitions appears to be precise enough to be systematically used for detecting timing anomalies in modern processors with out-of-order execution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Embedded and Real-Time Communication Systems (IJERTCS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"139-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Embedded and Real-Time Communication Systems (IJERTCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTCSA52859.2021.00024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Embedded and Real-Time Communication Systems (IJERTCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTCSA52859.2021.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在实时系统的开发过程中,正确性是一个重要的问题。除了功能正确性之外,通常还要正式验证计时行为,以确保在所有可能的执行条件下及时交付正确的结果。因此,实时软件的计时行为通常通过严格的计时分析来验证,该分析旨在确定最坏情况下的执行时间。时序异常是在现代计算机平台上验证时序特性的一个主要障碍。乱序执行和对共享资源的并发访问有时会导致——乍一看——令人惊讶的计时行为。为了捕捉这种情况,文献中提出了几个(半)正式的定义。然而,正如我们在这项工作中提出的那样,现有的定义似乎都不够精确,无法系统地用于检测具有乱序执行的现代处理器中的时序异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is This Still Normal? Putting Definitions of Timing Anomalies to the Test
Correctness is an important concern during the development of real-time systems. In addition to the functional correctness, the timing behavior is often formally verified in order to ensure that correct results are delivered in-time for all possible execution conditions. The timing behavior of real-time software is thus often validated through a rigorous timing analysis that aims at determining the worst-case execution time.Timing anomalies present a major obstacle during the validation of timing properties on modern computer platforms. Out-of-order execution and concurrent accesses to shared resources may sometimes lead to – at first sight – surprising timing behavior. Several (semi-)formal definitions have been proposed in the literature in order to capture such situations. However, as we present in this work, none of the existing definitions appears to be precise enough to be systematically used for detecting timing anomalies in modern processors with out-of-order execution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信