超声引导TAP阻滞对腹部手术术后疼痛缓解的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验

Heena Sanghavi, V. Shelgaonkar
{"title":"超声引导TAP阻滞对腹部手术术后疼痛缓解的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验","authors":"Heena Sanghavi, V. Shelgaonkar","doi":"10.18231/j.ijca.2023.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has emerged as a safe, reliable, and efficient technique to provide post-operative analgesia for a range of abdominal procedures and has been shown to minimize the usage of opioids in the perioperative period. This paper compares the overall efficacy and safety of TAP block for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgeries, by two techniques (blind v/s USG). Eighty patients, ASA grade I-II, 18-60 years age group, posted for abdominal surgery like appendicectomy, appendicular perforation, umbilical, paraumbilical, incisional and ventral hernia repair, hysterectomy and exploratory laparotomy under GA. They were divided into two groups to undergo blind or USG-guided TAP block. At the end of the procedure, before the reversal, both groups received a TAP block with Inj. Bupivacaine 0.25% 20cc on each side in supine position. Patients were followed up for 24 hours, and pain scores were measured using a visual analogue scale. Inj. Diclofenac was given as rescue analgesic and Inj. Tramadol was used for breakthrough pain. Total analgesic requirement for 24 hours and complications if any, were noted.: VAS score was found to be significantly lower in USG- guided group at various time intervals till 12 hours (2.05 ± 0.75 vs 2.98 ± 1.03) in the USG-guided group as compared to the blind group (p<0.05). Time to first rescue analgesic was significantly prolonged in USG- the guided group being 19.68 ± 4.90 hours than the blind technique of 13.48 ± 6.86 hours (p <0.001). The number of rescue analgesics required in the USG-guided group was significantly lower than the blind technique (p<0.05).: USG-guided group had significantly less pain scores postoperatively and a reduced number of analgesic requirements. This resulted in fewer opioid-mediated side effects. TAP block can serve as a part of multimodal analgesia with enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery. The USG-guided approach helped in achieving near perfect block which is evident by pain scores and reduced analgesics required.","PeriodicalId":13310,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of ultrasound-guided TAP block for postoperative pain relief in abdominal surgeries: A prospective, randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Heena Sanghavi, V. Shelgaonkar\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijca.2023.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has emerged as a safe, reliable, and efficient technique to provide post-operative analgesia for a range of abdominal procedures and has been shown to minimize the usage of opioids in the perioperative period. This paper compares the overall efficacy and safety of TAP block for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgeries, by two techniques (blind v/s USG). Eighty patients, ASA grade I-II, 18-60 years age group, posted for abdominal surgery like appendicectomy, appendicular perforation, umbilical, paraumbilical, incisional and ventral hernia repair, hysterectomy and exploratory laparotomy under GA. They were divided into two groups to undergo blind or USG-guided TAP block. At the end of the procedure, before the reversal, both groups received a TAP block with Inj. Bupivacaine 0.25% 20cc on each side in supine position. Patients were followed up for 24 hours, and pain scores were measured using a visual analogue scale. Inj. Diclofenac was given as rescue analgesic and Inj. Tramadol was used for breakthrough pain. Total analgesic requirement for 24 hours and complications if any, were noted.: VAS score was found to be significantly lower in USG- guided group at various time intervals till 12 hours (2.05 ± 0.75 vs 2.98 ± 1.03) in the USG-guided group as compared to the blind group (p<0.05). Time to first rescue analgesic was significantly prolonged in USG- the guided group being 19.68 ± 4.90 hours than the blind technique of 13.48 ± 6.86 hours (p <0.001). The number of rescue analgesics required in the USG-guided group was significantly lower than the blind technique (p<0.05).: USG-guided group had significantly less pain scores postoperatively and a reduced number of analgesic requirements. This resulted in fewer opioid-mediated side effects. TAP block can serve as a part of multimodal analgesia with enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery. The USG-guided approach helped in achieving near perfect block which is evident by pain scores and reduced analgesics required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2023.048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2023.048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经腹平面阻滞(TAP)已成为一种安全、可靠、有效的技术,可为一系列腹部手术提供术后镇痛,并已被证明可最大限度地减少围手术期阿片类药物的使用。通过两种技术(盲法v/s USG)比较TAP阻滞用于腹部手术术后镇痛的总体疗效和安全性。80例患者,ASA I-II级,年龄18-60岁,在GA下进行阑尾切除、阑尾穿孔、脐、脐旁、切口及腹侧疝修补、子宫切除、剖腹探查等腹部手术。他们被分为两组,分别进行盲法或usg引导的TAP阻滞。在手术结束,逆转之前,两组都接受了注射Inj的TAP阻滞。布比卡因0.25%,每侧20cc,仰卧位。患者随访24小时,采用视觉模拟量表测量疼痛评分。Inj。双氯芬酸作为抢救性镇痛药和静脉注射。曲马多用于突破性疼痛。记录24小时的总镇痛需求和并发症(如有)。USG引导组VAS评分在12 h前各时间间隔均明显低于盲组(2.05±0.75 vs 2.98±1.03)(p<0.05)。USG组首次抢救镇痛时间为19.68±4.90 h,明显长于盲法组的13.48±6.86 h (p <0.001)。usg引导组所需抢救镇痛药数量显著低于盲法组(p<0.05)。usg引导组术后疼痛评分明显降低,镇痛需求减少。这减少了阿片类药物介导的副作用。TAP阻滞可作为多模式镇痛的一部分,提高腹部手术后的恢复。usg引导的方法有助于实现接近完美的阻滞,这是明显的疼痛评分和减少止痛药所需。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided TAP block for postoperative pain relief in abdominal surgeries: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has emerged as a safe, reliable, and efficient technique to provide post-operative analgesia for a range of abdominal procedures and has been shown to minimize the usage of opioids in the perioperative period. This paper compares the overall efficacy and safety of TAP block for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgeries, by two techniques (blind v/s USG). Eighty patients, ASA grade I-II, 18-60 years age group, posted for abdominal surgery like appendicectomy, appendicular perforation, umbilical, paraumbilical, incisional and ventral hernia repair, hysterectomy and exploratory laparotomy under GA. They were divided into two groups to undergo blind or USG-guided TAP block. At the end of the procedure, before the reversal, both groups received a TAP block with Inj. Bupivacaine 0.25% 20cc on each side in supine position. Patients were followed up for 24 hours, and pain scores were measured using a visual analogue scale. Inj. Diclofenac was given as rescue analgesic and Inj. Tramadol was used for breakthrough pain. Total analgesic requirement for 24 hours and complications if any, were noted.: VAS score was found to be significantly lower in USG- guided group at various time intervals till 12 hours (2.05 ± 0.75 vs 2.98 ± 1.03) in the USG-guided group as compared to the blind group (p<0.05). Time to first rescue analgesic was significantly prolonged in USG- the guided group being 19.68 ± 4.90 hours than the blind technique of 13.48 ± 6.86 hours (p <0.001). The number of rescue analgesics required in the USG-guided group was significantly lower than the blind technique (p<0.05).: USG-guided group had significantly less pain scores postoperatively and a reduced number of analgesic requirements. This resulted in fewer opioid-mediated side effects. TAP block can serve as a part of multimodal analgesia with enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery. The USG-guided approach helped in achieving near perfect block which is evident by pain scores and reduced analgesics required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信