球队胜率对BCS足球新兵力量和速度特征的影响

A. Caterisano, Mike Gentry, Michael J. Caterisano, Charles Shaner
{"title":"球队胜率对BCS足球新兵力量和速度特征的影响","authors":"A. Caterisano, Mike Gentry, Michael J. Caterisano, Charles Shaner","doi":"10.1249/01.mss.0000686876.78936.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the volatility of NCAA Division I BCS Football coaching and support staffs, it is difficult to collect reliable, longitudinal data using consistent physical performance tests on players entering the program. The data set in the current study represents a twenty-nine year period collected by the same Head Strength and Conditioning Coach in the same football program. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the physical testing of the players entering the program in the early years, (1987 -1998) of the Head Football Coach‘s tenure, when the team studied winning percentage was (56.5%) to a later period (1999-2014) when the team‘s winning percentage improved to (73.3%). METHODS: A cohort of 1094 NCAA Division I BCS level football players that played at the same institution under the same Head Football Coach and Head Strength and Conditioning Coach during the years of 1987-2104 were divided into two groups depending on the era in which they played. Group One (G1 n=581) played between 1987 and 1998 (12 year period). Group One‘s win/loss record was 77-59, with a (56.5% winning percentage). Group 2 (G2 n=513) played between 1999 and 2014 (16 year period) the team win/loss record was 154-56 during this period representing a (73.3% winning percentage). Data were collected when each athlete joined the team in the following areas across the entire twenty-nine-year period. Measurements were collected in Height (HT), Body Mass (BM), One Repetition Maximum (1RM) in the Bench Press (BP), the Vertical Jump (VJ), and 40-yard dash (40YD). All data were collected by the same Head Strength and Conditioning Coach. All data were analyzed using paired t-tests for each parameter tested. RESULTS: G2 had significantly better initial test results in each of the following tests: BM (106.9 vs 101.7 kg.; P<0.01), BP (133.3 vs 124.9 kg.; P<0.01), VJ (30.1 vs 27.0 in.; P<0.01), and 40YD (4.8 vs 5.0 sec.; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that having a successful football program at the Division I BCS level may attract recruits that are bigger, stronger in the upper body, with greater lower body power and running speed. Although it may not be the only thing that affects the decision of 4 and 5-star athletes to sign with a Division I BCS football team, it appears to be a major factor.","PeriodicalId":14781,"journal":{"name":"Journal is not defined within the JOURNAL database.","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect Of Team Winning Percentage On BCS Football Recruit Strength And Speed Characteristics\",\"authors\":\"A. Caterisano, Mike Gentry, Michael J. Caterisano, Charles Shaner\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/01.mss.0000686876.78936.89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the volatility of NCAA Division I BCS Football coaching and support staffs, it is difficult to collect reliable, longitudinal data using consistent physical performance tests on players entering the program. The data set in the current study represents a twenty-nine year period collected by the same Head Strength and Conditioning Coach in the same football program. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the physical testing of the players entering the program in the early years, (1987 -1998) of the Head Football Coach‘s tenure, when the team studied winning percentage was (56.5%) to a later period (1999-2014) when the team‘s winning percentage improved to (73.3%). METHODS: A cohort of 1094 NCAA Division I BCS level football players that played at the same institution under the same Head Football Coach and Head Strength and Conditioning Coach during the years of 1987-2104 were divided into two groups depending on the era in which they played. Group One (G1 n=581) played between 1987 and 1998 (12 year period). Group One‘s win/loss record was 77-59, with a (56.5% winning percentage). Group 2 (G2 n=513) played between 1999 and 2014 (16 year period) the team win/loss record was 154-56 during this period representing a (73.3% winning percentage). Data were collected when each athlete joined the team in the following areas across the entire twenty-nine-year period. Measurements were collected in Height (HT), Body Mass (BM), One Repetition Maximum (1RM) in the Bench Press (BP), the Vertical Jump (VJ), and 40-yard dash (40YD). All data were collected by the same Head Strength and Conditioning Coach. All data were analyzed using paired t-tests for each parameter tested. RESULTS: G2 had significantly better initial test results in each of the following tests: BM (106.9 vs 101.7 kg.; P<0.01), BP (133.3 vs 124.9 kg.; P<0.01), VJ (30.1 vs 27.0 in.; P<0.01), and 40YD (4.8 vs 5.0 sec.; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that having a successful football program at the Division I BCS level may attract recruits that are bigger, stronger in the upper body, with greater lower body power and running speed. Although it may not be the only thing that affects the decision of 4 and 5-star athletes to sign with a Division I BCS football team, it appears to be a major factor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal is not defined within the JOURNAL database.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal is not defined within the JOURNAL database.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000686876.78936.89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal is not defined within the JOURNAL database.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000686876.78936.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于NCAA一级联赛BCS足球教练和支持人员的波动性,很难通过对进入该计划的球员进行一致的身体表现测试来收集可靠的纵向数据。当前研究中的数据集代表了由同一位头部力量和调节教练在同一足球项目中收集的29年期间的数据。目的:本研究的目的是比较在足球总教练任期的早期(1987 -1998),当球队的研究胜率为(56.5%)时,进入项目的球员的身体测试与后期(1999-2014),当球队的胜率提高到(73.3%)。方法:选取1094名1987- 1994年间在同一所大学、由同一名橄榄球主教练和头部力量与调节教练执教的NCAA一级联赛足球运动员作为研究对象,根据参赛时间将其分为两组。第一组(G1 n=581)比赛时间为1987年至1998年(12年)。第一组的战绩是77胜59负,胜率为56.5%。第2组(G2 n=513)在1999年至2014年(16年期间)比赛,球队在此期间的胜率为154胜56负,胜率为73.3%。当每个运动员在整个29年期间加入团队时,收集了以下方面的数据。测量数据包括身高(HT)、体重(BM)、卧推(BP)、垂直跳(VJ)和40码冲刺(40YD)中的最大单次重复(1RM)。所有数据均由同一位头部力量和体能教练收集。所有数据均采用配对t检验对每个被检验参数进行分析。结果:G2在以下各项试验中的初始试验结果明显更好:BM (106.9 vs 101.7 kg.;P<0.01),血压(133.3 vs 124.9 kg;P<0.01), VJ (30.1 vs 27.0 in;P<0.01)和40YD (4.8 vs 5.0秒;P < 0.01)。结论:成功的BCS一级足球项目可能会吸引体型更大、上身更强壮、下肢力量更大、跑步速度更快的新兵。虽然这可能不是影响4星和5星运动员与英国足球协会一级联赛足球队签约的唯一因素,但它似乎是一个主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect Of Team Winning Percentage On BCS Football Recruit Strength And Speed Characteristics
Due to the volatility of NCAA Division I BCS Football coaching and support staffs, it is difficult to collect reliable, longitudinal data using consistent physical performance tests on players entering the program. The data set in the current study represents a twenty-nine year period collected by the same Head Strength and Conditioning Coach in the same football program. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the physical testing of the players entering the program in the early years, (1987 -1998) of the Head Football Coach‘s tenure, when the team studied winning percentage was (56.5%) to a later period (1999-2014) when the team‘s winning percentage improved to (73.3%). METHODS: A cohort of 1094 NCAA Division I BCS level football players that played at the same institution under the same Head Football Coach and Head Strength and Conditioning Coach during the years of 1987-2104 were divided into two groups depending on the era in which they played. Group One (G1 n=581) played between 1987 and 1998 (12 year period). Group One‘s win/loss record was 77-59, with a (56.5% winning percentage). Group 2 (G2 n=513) played between 1999 and 2014 (16 year period) the team win/loss record was 154-56 during this period representing a (73.3% winning percentage). Data were collected when each athlete joined the team in the following areas across the entire twenty-nine-year period. Measurements were collected in Height (HT), Body Mass (BM), One Repetition Maximum (1RM) in the Bench Press (BP), the Vertical Jump (VJ), and 40-yard dash (40YD). All data were collected by the same Head Strength and Conditioning Coach. All data were analyzed using paired t-tests for each parameter tested. RESULTS: G2 had significantly better initial test results in each of the following tests: BM (106.9 vs 101.7 kg.; P<0.01), BP (133.3 vs 124.9 kg.; P<0.01), VJ (30.1 vs 27.0 in.; P<0.01), and 40YD (4.8 vs 5.0 sec.; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that having a successful football program at the Division I BCS level may attract recruits that are bigger, stronger in the upper body, with greater lower body power and running speed. Although it may not be the only thing that affects the decision of 4 and 5-star athletes to sign with a Division I BCS football team, it appears to be a major factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信