基于随机跳表协议的隐私性

Zhuohua Liu, Chuankun Wu
{"title":"基于随机跳表协议的隐私性","authors":"Zhuohua Liu, Chuankun Wu","doi":"10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Privacy and efficiency are two important but seemingly contradictory objectives in radio-frequency identification (RFID) systems. On one hand, RFID aims to identify objects easily and quickly, on the other hand, users want to maintain the necessary privacy without being tracked down for where they are and what they are doing. Common RFID privacy-preserving authentication protocols can be classified into tree-based schemes and group-based schemes, and all these schemes do not meet the dual goals of efficiency and security at the same time. In 2013, Sakai et al. proposed a randomised skip lists-based authentication protocol (RSLA), and claimed that the RSLA can resist compromise attacks. In this study, the authors analyse the compromise attacks on RSLA and show that there is no obvious advantage with respect to the privacy of the RSLA compared with balanced tree-based schemes. Moreover, it is reasonable to claim that protocols based on skip lists are also vulnerable to compromise attacks.","PeriodicalId":13305,"journal":{"name":"IET Inf. Secur.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy of a randomised skip lists-based protocol\",\"authors\":\"Zhuohua Liu, Chuankun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Privacy and efficiency are two important but seemingly contradictory objectives in radio-frequency identification (RFID) systems. On one hand, RFID aims to identify objects easily and quickly, on the other hand, users want to maintain the necessary privacy without being tracked down for where they are and what they are doing. Common RFID privacy-preserving authentication protocols can be classified into tree-based schemes and group-based schemes, and all these schemes do not meet the dual goals of efficiency and security at the same time. In 2013, Sakai et al. proposed a randomised skip lists-based authentication protocol (RSLA), and claimed that the RSLA can resist compromise attacks. In this study, the authors analyse the compromise attacks on RSLA and show that there is no obvious advantage with respect to the privacy of the RSLA compared with balanced tree-based schemes. Moreover, it is reasonable to claim that protocols based on skip lists are also vulnerable to compromise attacks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在射频识别(RFID)系统中,隐私和效率是两个重要但看似矛盾的目标。一方面,RFID旨在方便快速地识别物体,另一方面,用户希望保持必要的隐私,而不会被追踪到他们在哪里和他们在做什么。常见的RFID隐私保护认证协议分为基于树的认证协议和基于组的认证协议,这些协议都不能同时满足效率和安全的双重目标。2013年,Sakai等人提出了一种基于随机跳表的身份验证协议(RSLA),并声称RSLA可以抵抗妥协攻击。在这项研究中,作者分析了对RSLA的妥协攻击,并表明与基于平衡树的方案相比,RSLA在隐私方面没有明显的优势。此外,有理由声称基于跳跃表的协议也容易受到折衷攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Privacy of a randomised skip lists-based protocol
Privacy and efficiency are two important but seemingly contradictory objectives in radio-frequency identification (RFID) systems. On one hand, RFID aims to identify objects easily and quickly, on the other hand, users want to maintain the necessary privacy without being tracked down for where they are and what they are doing. Common RFID privacy-preserving authentication protocols can be classified into tree-based schemes and group-based schemes, and all these schemes do not meet the dual goals of efficiency and security at the same time. In 2013, Sakai et al. proposed a randomised skip lists-based authentication protocol (RSLA), and claimed that the RSLA can resist compromise attacks. In this study, the authors analyse the compromise attacks on RSLA and show that there is no obvious advantage with respect to the privacy of the RSLA compared with balanced tree-based schemes. Moreover, it is reasonable to claim that protocols based on skip lists are also vulnerable to compromise attacks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信