一种新的电子诊断支持工具(AiD-DST)的试点测试,旨在确定谵妄的原因

E. Eeles, Peter Worthy, A. Teodorczuk, Paven Kaur, N. Dissanayaka
{"title":"一种新的电子诊断支持工具(AiD-DST)的试点测试,旨在确定谵妄的原因","authors":"E. Eeles, Peter Worthy, A. Teodorczuk, Paven Kaur, N. Dissanayaka","doi":"10.56392/001c.37365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delirium is frequently multifactorial, and causes are often missed in clinical practice. The Aetiology in Delirium - Diagnostic Support Tool (AiD-DST) was developed to improve recognition of the causes. We undertook an evaluation of an electronic version of AiD-DST. A development and evaluation life cycle of improvement was used. In phase 1, alpha testing among the development group evaluated technical performance of AiD-DST. In phase 2, we performed a cycle of beta testing among junior doctors to assess impressions of AiD-DST using Think Aloud methodology. We grouped responses into themes and made changes to AiD-DST by the development group accordingly. In phase 3, usability and acceptance of AiD-DST was assessed using the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). In phase 1, software issues were identified, and modifications made. In phase 2, feedback was obtained from 29 junior doctors. Three cycles of feedback were obtained. The number of items identified after each cycle were 20, 12 and 7, respectively. Content was grouped into themes of; ‘style and grammar’, ‘formatting’, ‘IT’, ‘missed diagnosis’ and ‘other concerns.’ In phase 3, 20 participants completed MAUQ questionnaire. Overall, the average score was 6.36 (SD=0.8) with 7 as the highest attainable score. This translates to agreement up to strong agreement concerning usability of AiD-DST. After a process of optimisation, AiD-DST has been shown to be a usable and potentially useful diagnostic support tool to help junior doctors identify cause(s) of delirium. An implementation study is planned.","PeriodicalId":72776,"journal":{"name":"Delirium communications","volume":"320 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot testing of a new electronic diagnostic support tool (AiD-DST) designed to identify the cause(s) of delirium\",\"authors\":\"E. Eeles, Peter Worthy, A. Teodorczuk, Paven Kaur, N. Dissanayaka\",\"doi\":\"10.56392/001c.37365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Delirium is frequently multifactorial, and causes are often missed in clinical practice. The Aetiology in Delirium - Diagnostic Support Tool (AiD-DST) was developed to improve recognition of the causes. We undertook an evaluation of an electronic version of AiD-DST. A development and evaluation life cycle of improvement was used. In phase 1, alpha testing among the development group evaluated technical performance of AiD-DST. In phase 2, we performed a cycle of beta testing among junior doctors to assess impressions of AiD-DST using Think Aloud methodology. We grouped responses into themes and made changes to AiD-DST by the development group accordingly. In phase 3, usability and acceptance of AiD-DST was assessed using the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). In phase 1, software issues were identified, and modifications made. In phase 2, feedback was obtained from 29 junior doctors. Three cycles of feedback were obtained. The number of items identified after each cycle were 20, 12 and 7, respectively. Content was grouped into themes of; ‘style and grammar’, ‘formatting’, ‘IT’, ‘missed diagnosis’ and ‘other concerns.’ In phase 3, 20 participants completed MAUQ questionnaire. Overall, the average score was 6.36 (SD=0.8) with 7 as the highest attainable score. This translates to agreement up to strong agreement concerning usability of AiD-DST. After a process of optimisation, AiD-DST has been shown to be a usable and potentially useful diagnostic support tool to help junior doctors identify cause(s) of delirium. An implementation study is planned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Delirium communications\",\"volume\":\"320 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Delirium communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56392/001c.37365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delirium communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56392/001c.37365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

谵妄常常是多因素的,在临床实践中常常遗漏病因。谵妄的病因诊断支持工具(AiD-DST)是为了提高对病因的认识而开发的。我们对一个电子版的AiD-DST进行了评估。采用了改进的开发和评价生命周期。在第1阶段,开发小组之间的alpha测试评估了AiD-DST的技术性能。在第二阶段,我们在初级医生中进行了一轮beta测试,以评估使用Think Aloud方法对AiD-DST的印象。我们将响应分组为主题,并由开发小组对AiD-DST进行相应的更改。在第三阶段,使用移动健康应用可用性问卷(MAUQ)评估AiD-DST的可用性和接受度。在阶段1中,确定了软件问题,并进行了修改。在第二阶段,获得了29名初级医生的反馈。得到了三个反馈周期。每个周期后确定的项目数量分别为20、12和7个。内容分为主题;“风格和语法”、“格式”、“IT”、“漏诊”和“其他问题”。在第三阶段,20名参与者完成了MAUQ问卷。总体而言,平均得分为6.36 (SD=0.8),最高得分为7分。这就转化为关于AiD-DST可用性的强有力的协议。经过一个优化的过程,AiD-DST已被证明是一个可用的和潜在有用的诊断支持工具,帮助初级医生确定谵妄的原因。计划进行一项实施研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pilot testing of a new electronic diagnostic support tool (AiD-DST) designed to identify the cause(s) of delirium
Delirium is frequently multifactorial, and causes are often missed in clinical practice. The Aetiology in Delirium - Diagnostic Support Tool (AiD-DST) was developed to improve recognition of the causes. We undertook an evaluation of an electronic version of AiD-DST. A development and evaluation life cycle of improvement was used. In phase 1, alpha testing among the development group evaluated technical performance of AiD-DST. In phase 2, we performed a cycle of beta testing among junior doctors to assess impressions of AiD-DST using Think Aloud methodology. We grouped responses into themes and made changes to AiD-DST by the development group accordingly. In phase 3, usability and acceptance of AiD-DST was assessed using the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). In phase 1, software issues were identified, and modifications made. In phase 2, feedback was obtained from 29 junior doctors. Three cycles of feedback were obtained. The number of items identified after each cycle were 20, 12 and 7, respectively. Content was grouped into themes of; ‘style and grammar’, ‘formatting’, ‘IT’, ‘missed diagnosis’ and ‘other concerns.’ In phase 3, 20 participants completed MAUQ questionnaire. Overall, the average score was 6.36 (SD=0.8) with 7 as the highest attainable score. This translates to agreement up to strong agreement concerning usability of AiD-DST. After a process of optimisation, AiD-DST has been shown to be a usable and potentially useful diagnostic support tool to help junior doctors identify cause(s) of delirium. An implementation study is planned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信