对机器的愤怒:一个烧钱的实地实验

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS
Muhammad Ryan Sanjaya
{"title":"对机器的愤怒:一个烧钱的实地实验","authors":"Muhammad Ryan Sanjaya","doi":"10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss1.art11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose ― This study investigates antisocial behaviour where participants made payoff destruction decisions (“money burning”) that are conditional on the co-participant being a human or a computer.\nMethods ― This study uses the joy-of-destruction minigame experiment with Indonesian citizens living in Australia as the participants. Regression methods are used to observe whether discrimination occurs and to identify factors associated with antisocial behaviour.\nFindings ― This study finds money burning against the computer to be more prevalent than against humans. There was very limited support that such behaviour was correlated with demographic characteristics or subjective norms, suggesting that the presence of a computer co-participant drives the result.\nImplications ― The results have a methodological implication for experimental economics where experimenters should anticipate that computer players may have an unforeseen impact on human behaviour. Policy-wise, the study shows a relatively cohesive community which may be driven by the multicultural policy of Australia.\nOriginality ― This is the first antisocial behaviour economics experiment that includes a computer as a potential co-participant.","PeriodicalId":41472,"journal":{"name":"Economic Journal of Emerging Markets","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rage against the machine: A money-burning field experiment\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ryan Sanjaya\",\"doi\":\"10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss1.art11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose ― This study investigates antisocial behaviour where participants made payoff destruction decisions (“money burning”) that are conditional on the co-participant being a human or a computer.\\nMethods ― This study uses the joy-of-destruction minigame experiment with Indonesian citizens living in Australia as the participants. Regression methods are used to observe whether discrimination occurs and to identify factors associated with antisocial behaviour.\\nFindings ― This study finds money burning against the computer to be more prevalent than against humans. There was very limited support that such behaviour was correlated with demographic characteristics or subjective norms, suggesting that the presence of a computer co-participant drives the result.\\nImplications ― The results have a methodological implication for experimental economics where experimenters should anticipate that computer players may have an unforeseen impact on human behaviour. Policy-wise, the study shows a relatively cohesive community which may be driven by the multicultural policy of Australia.\\nOriginality ― This is the first antisocial behaviour economics experiment that includes a computer as a potential co-participant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Journal of Emerging Markets\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Journal of Emerging Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss1.art11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Journal of Emerging Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss1.art11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的-本研究调查了反社会行为,参与者做出的回报破坏决定(“烧钱”)是有条件的共同参与者是人还是计算机。方法:本研究以居住在澳大利亚的印尼公民为研究对象,进行了欢乐毁灭小游戏实验。回归方法用于观察歧视是否发生,并确定与反社会行为相关的因素。研究结果:这项研究发现,针对电脑的烧钱行为比针对人类的烧钱行为更为普遍。这种行为与人口特征或主观规范相关的支持非常有限,这表明计算机共同参与者的存在驱动了结果。启示-研究结果对实验经济学有方法论上的启示,实验者应该预测电脑玩家可能对人类行为产生不可预见的影响。政策方面,研究显示了一个相对有凝聚力的社区,这可能是由澳大利亚的多元文化政策推动的。独创性——这是第一个将计算机作为潜在共同参与者的反社会行为经济学实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rage against the machine: A money-burning field experiment
Purpose ― This study investigates antisocial behaviour where participants made payoff destruction decisions (“money burning”) that are conditional on the co-participant being a human or a computer. Methods ― This study uses the joy-of-destruction minigame experiment with Indonesian citizens living in Australia as the participants. Regression methods are used to observe whether discrimination occurs and to identify factors associated with antisocial behaviour. Findings ― This study finds money burning against the computer to be more prevalent than against humans. There was very limited support that such behaviour was correlated with demographic characteristics or subjective norms, suggesting that the presence of a computer co-participant drives the result. Implications ― The results have a methodological implication for experimental economics where experimenters should anticipate that computer players may have an unforeseen impact on human behaviour. Policy-wise, the study shows a relatively cohesive community which may be driven by the multicultural policy of Australia. Originality ― This is the first antisocial behaviour economics experiment that includes a computer as a potential co-participant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信