非裔美国人的种族效能感和选民参与

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
G. Leslie, Tye Rush, Jonathan E. Collins, M. Barreto
{"title":"非裔美国人的种族效能感和选民参与","authors":"G. Leslie, Tye Rush, Jonathan E. Collins, M. Barreto","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2023.2228534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political efficacy plays an important role in mediating the relationship between constituents and their government and positively influences turnout in elections. This paper investigates the effect blacks’ perceptions of racism in American institutions and society have on their propensity to vote in the presidential election. We call this measure racial efficacy. We hypothesize that blacks with high feelings of racial efficacy, the perception that American institutions and society operate and disburse justice in a racially equitable manner, the more likely they will be to vote in 2016. Conversely, blacks with low feelings of racial efficacy, who believe that government and society are racially unjust were discouraged from voting. However, we posit that confidence in in-group leaders and movements can counteract the demobilizing effect of low racial efficacy. Our analysis uses data from an African American Research Collaborative (AARC) survey which surveyed 1,200 African American registered voters nationally, with oversamples in Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Regression analysis of voter turnout in 2016 finds that blacks with low feelings of racial efficacy are statistically less likely to vote, all else being equal. We also find support for our in-group confidence theory where having highly favorable attitudes toward Barack Obama, Black Elected Officials, and BLM recovers the propensity to vote for low racial efficacy blacks almost to the levels of their racially optimistic counterparts. This contributes to the literature by further examining the intersections of efficacy, discrimination, and political behavior. * The authors wish to thank Henry Fernandez and the AARC for use of the 2016 and 2017 datasets, and to Prof. Ray Block who worked on the AARC survey projects for his advice and feedback.","PeriodicalId":46590,"journal":{"name":"Politics Groups and Identities","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived racial efficacy and voter engagement among African Americans\",\"authors\":\"G. Leslie, Tye Rush, Jonathan E. Collins, M. Barreto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21565503.2023.2228534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political efficacy plays an important role in mediating the relationship between constituents and their government and positively influences turnout in elections. This paper investigates the effect blacks’ perceptions of racism in American institutions and society have on their propensity to vote in the presidential election. We call this measure racial efficacy. We hypothesize that blacks with high feelings of racial efficacy, the perception that American institutions and society operate and disburse justice in a racially equitable manner, the more likely they will be to vote in 2016. Conversely, blacks with low feelings of racial efficacy, who believe that government and society are racially unjust were discouraged from voting. However, we posit that confidence in in-group leaders and movements can counteract the demobilizing effect of low racial efficacy. Our analysis uses data from an African American Research Collaborative (AARC) survey which surveyed 1,200 African American registered voters nationally, with oversamples in Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Regression analysis of voter turnout in 2016 finds that blacks with low feelings of racial efficacy are statistically less likely to vote, all else being equal. We also find support for our in-group confidence theory where having highly favorable attitudes toward Barack Obama, Black Elected Officials, and BLM recovers the propensity to vote for low racial efficacy blacks almost to the levels of their racially optimistic counterparts. This contributes to the literature by further examining the intersections of efficacy, discrimination, and political behavior. * The authors wish to thank Henry Fernandez and the AARC for use of the 2016 and 2017 datasets, and to Prof. Ray Block who worked on the AARC survey projects for his advice and feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics Groups and Identities\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics Groups and Identities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2023.2228534\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Groups and Identities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2023.2228534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

政治效能在调解选民与政府的关系中发挥重要作用,并对选举投票率产生正向影响。本文研究了黑人对美国制度和社会中种族主义的认知对他们在总统选举中投票倾向的影响。我们称之为种族效能。我们假设,对种族效能感高的黑人,即认为美国制度和社会以种族平等的方式运作和分配司法的黑人,就越有可能在2016年投票。相反,种族效能感低的黑人认为政府和社会存在种族不公正,因此不鼓励他们投票。然而,我们认为,对群体内领导人和运动的信心可以抵消低种族效能的遣散效应。我们的分析使用了非裔美国人研究合作组织(AARC)的调查数据,该调查在全国范围内调查了1200名非裔美国人登记选民,并在内华达州、宾夕法尼亚州和佐治亚州进行了抽样调查。对2016年选民投票率的回归分析发现,在其他条件相同的情况下,种族效能感低的黑人投票的可能性在统计上更低。我们还发现支持我们的群体内信心理论,即对奥巴马、黑人民选官员和BLM持高度正面态度的人,将投票给种族效率低的黑人的倾向恢复到几乎与种族乐观的黑人相同的水平。这有助于通过进一步检查效能,歧视和政治行为的交叉点的文献。*作者希望感谢Henry Fernandez和AARC使用2016年和2017年的数据集,并感谢参与AARC调查项目的Ray Block教授提供的建议和反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived racial efficacy and voter engagement among African Americans
Political efficacy plays an important role in mediating the relationship between constituents and their government and positively influences turnout in elections. This paper investigates the effect blacks’ perceptions of racism in American institutions and society have on their propensity to vote in the presidential election. We call this measure racial efficacy. We hypothesize that blacks with high feelings of racial efficacy, the perception that American institutions and society operate and disburse justice in a racially equitable manner, the more likely they will be to vote in 2016. Conversely, blacks with low feelings of racial efficacy, who believe that government and society are racially unjust were discouraged from voting. However, we posit that confidence in in-group leaders and movements can counteract the demobilizing effect of low racial efficacy. Our analysis uses data from an African American Research Collaborative (AARC) survey which surveyed 1,200 African American registered voters nationally, with oversamples in Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. Regression analysis of voter turnout in 2016 finds that blacks with low feelings of racial efficacy are statistically less likely to vote, all else being equal. We also find support for our in-group confidence theory where having highly favorable attitudes toward Barack Obama, Black Elected Officials, and BLM recovers the propensity to vote for low racial efficacy blacks almost to the levels of their racially optimistic counterparts. This contributes to the literature by further examining the intersections of efficacy, discrimination, and political behavior. * The authors wish to thank Henry Fernandez and the AARC for use of the 2016 and 2017 datasets, and to Prof. Ray Block who worked on the AARC survey projects for his advice and feedback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politics Groups and Identities
Politics Groups and Identities POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信