全球记者的自主性:46个大众传媒系统的类型学

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION
M. Meyen
{"title":"全球记者的自主性:46个大众传媒系统的类型学","authors":"M. Meyen","doi":"10.22032/dbt.35003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using structuration theory, assuming that every government has a stake in steering public \ncommunication and comparing 46 nation-states, this paper explores the major principles that \ncan be used to explain different mass media structures around the globe. The study draws on extensive \ndocumentary analysis and includes more than 150 expert interviews. It shows that media freedom \nand journalists’ autonomy depend on not only the particular governmental system, the constitution, \njournalism education, and the existence of commercial media but also, to a significant extent, \non economic realities, the tradition of press freedom, and various other factors that are historical, \nreligious, and/or geographic. The tool to do so is a mass media system typology based on two \ndimensions: formal expectations and the state’s influence.","PeriodicalId":29900,"journal":{"name":"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition","volume":"359 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Journalists’ autonomy around the globe: a typology of 46 mass media systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Meyen\",\"doi\":\"10.22032/dbt.35003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using structuration theory, assuming that every government has a stake in steering public \\ncommunication and comparing 46 nation-states, this paper explores the major principles that \\ncan be used to explain different mass media structures around the globe. The study draws on extensive \\ndocumentary analysis and includes more than 150 expert interviews. It shows that media freedom \\nand journalists’ autonomy depend on not only the particular governmental system, the constitution, \\njournalism education, and the existence of commercial media but also, to a significant extent, \\non economic realities, the tradition of press freedom, and various other factors that are historical, \\nreligious, and/or geographic. The tool to do so is a mass media system typology based on two \\ndimensions: formal expectations and the state’s influence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition\",\"volume\":\"359 1\",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.35003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media Journal-Canadian Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.35003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文运用结构理论,假设每个政府都在引导公共传播方面有利害关系,并比较了46个民族国家,探讨了可用于解释全球不同大众媒体结构的主要原则。这项研究采用了大量的文献分析,包括150多位专家访谈。它表明,媒体自由和记者的自主权不仅取决于特定的政府制度、宪法、新闻教育和商业媒体的存在,而且在很大程度上取决于经济现实、新闻自由的传统以及其他各种历史、宗教和/或地理因素。这样做的工具是基于两个维度的大众媒体系统类型学:正式期望和国家影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Journalists’ autonomy around the globe: a typology of 46 mass media systems
Using structuration theory, assuming that every government has a stake in steering public communication and comparing 46 nation-states, this paper explores the major principles that can be used to explain different mass media structures around the globe. The study draws on extensive documentary analysis and includes more than 150 expert interviews. It shows that media freedom and journalists’ autonomy depend on not only the particular governmental system, the constitution, journalism education, and the existence of commercial media but also, to a significant extent, on economic realities, the tradition of press freedom, and various other factors that are historical, religious, and/or geographic. The tool to do so is a mass media system typology based on two dimensions: formal expectations and the state’s influence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信