{"title":"信息检索的探索:古拉帕努伊岛(复活节岛)的铭文遗迹-第一部分","authors":"Tomi S. Melka, R. Schoch","doi":"10.31577/AASSAV.2021.30.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Part I of this article (Melka and Schoch 2021), 1 we described an antique wooden artifact from Easter Island, known as the “ Lutz – Terasaki fragment”, that bears a single rongorongo glyph. Here we focus further on the “ Lutz – Terasaki fragment”, gleaning as much evidence as we can by resorting to a complex analysis. The ethno-linguistic, epigraphic, and xylological data point – thus far – toward the remains of an artifact of utilitarian and/or ritualistic scope. In order to exhaust every potentiality regarding the “ Lutz – Terasaki fragment” and the meaning of the glyph that it bears, we must consider similar contexts that may appear in the future if other artifacts are located bearing the same or a similar glyph. It is acknowledged that in the absence of new corroborating evidence, even the best - formed hypotheses concerning rongorongo glyphs and sequences may stretch too thin and, quite often, be summarily dismissed or simply ignored. Continuing investigation and rational conversation with scholars of Rapa Nui, we have found to our profit, are efficacious ways to respond to hypothetical settings. To suggest otherwise would be highly arguable or erroneous.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE QUEST FOR INFORMATION RETRIEVAL: AN INSCRIBED RELIC FROM ANCIENT RAPA NUI (EASTER ISLAND) – Part I\",\"authors\":\"Tomi S. Melka, R. Schoch\",\"doi\":\"10.31577/AASSAV.2021.30.1.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Part I of this article (Melka and Schoch 2021), 1 we described an antique wooden artifact from Easter Island, known as the “ Lutz – Terasaki fragment”, that bears a single rongorongo glyph. Here we focus further on the “ Lutz – Terasaki fragment”, gleaning as much evidence as we can by resorting to a complex analysis. The ethno-linguistic, epigraphic, and xylological data point – thus far – toward the remains of an artifact of utilitarian and/or ritualistic scope. In order to exhaust every potentiality regarding the “ Lutz – Terasaki fragment” and the meaning of the glyph that it bears, we must consider similar contexts that may appear in the future if other artifacts are located bearing the same or a similar glyph. It is acknowledged that in the absence of new corroborating evidence, even the best - formed hypotheses concerning rongorongo glyphs and sequences may stretch too thin and, quite often, be summarily dismissed or simply ignored. Continuing investigation and rational conversation with scholars of Rapa Nui, we have found to our profit, are efficacious ways to respond to hypothetical settings. To suggest otherwise would be highly arguable or erroneous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31577/AASSAV.2021.30.1.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/AASSAV.2021.30.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在这篇文章的第一部分(Melka and Schoch 2021)中,我们描述了一件来自复活节岛的古董木制工艺品,被称为“Lutz - Terasaki碎片”,上面有一个单一的rongorongo字形。在这里,我们进一步关注“鲁兹-寺崎碎片”,通过复杂的分析收集尽可能多的证据。到目前为止,民族语言学、碑文学和语文学数据点指向了实用主义和/或仪式范围内的人工制品的遗迹。为了穷尽关于“鲁兹-寺崎碎片”的每一种可能性,以及它所承载的象形文字的含义,我们必须考虑未来可能出现的类似背景,如果其他文物被定位为具有相同或类似的象形文字。人们承认,在缺乏新的确凿证据的情况下,即使是关于朗格朗格字形和序列的最完善的假设也可能过于单薄,而且往往被草率地驳回或简单地忽略。我们发现,与拉帕努伊岛的学者进行持续的调查和理性的对话是应对假设环境的有效方法,这对我们有益。相反的建议是非常有争议的或错误的。
THE QUEST FOR INFORMATION RETRIEVAL: AN INSCRIBED RELIC FROM ANCIENT RAPA NUI (EASTER ISLAND) – Part I
In Part I of this article (Melka and Schoch 2021), 1 we described an antique wooden artifact from Easter Island, known as the “ Lutz – Terasaki fragment”, that bears a single rongorongo glyph. Here we focus further on the “ Lutz – Terasaki fragment”, gleaning as much evidence as we can by resorting to a complex analysis. The ethno-linguistic, epigraphic, and xylological data point – thus far – toward the remains of an artifact of utilitarian and/or ritualistic scope. In order to exhaust every potentiality regarding the “ Lutz – Terasaki fragment” and the meaning of the glyph that it bears, we must consider similar contexts that may appear in the future if other artifacts are located bearing the same or a similar glyph. It is acknowledged that in the absence of new corroborating evidence, even the best - formed hypotheses concerning rongorongo glyphs and sequences may stretch too thin and, quite often, be summarily dismissed or simply ignored. Continuing investigation and rational conversation with scholars of Rapa Nui, we have found to our profit, are efficacious ways to respond to hypothetical settings. To suggest otherwise would be highly arguable or erroneous.