共和自由与现代抽象的品达式谱系

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY

Contributions to the History of Concepts Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.3167/CHOC.2019.140103

B. Maslov

{"title":"共和自由与现代抽象的品达式谱系","authors":"B. Maslov","doi":"10.3167/CHOC.2019.140103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pindaric odes written around the time of the French Revolution have a penchant for abstractions. Apostrophized Liberty, Fortune, Virtue, and Joy, which replaced the monarch as the ode’s addressee, attest to the numinous prehistory of distinctively modern concepts that Reinhart Koselleck termed “collective singulars.” In particular, eighteenth-century Pindarics put forward representations of Liberty prevailing over an unenlightened past, which conform to the schema of victorious encounter established in Pindar’s epinician odes. The article dwells closely on two ostensibly pro-revolutionary and highly influential texts in the Pindaric mold, Alexander Radishchev’s Liberty and Friedrich Schiller’s To Joy, which share a concept of freedom that diverges from both the republican and the liberal interpretations.","PeriodicalId":42746,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Republican Liberty and the Pindaric Genealogy of Modern Abstractions\",\"authors\":\"B. Maslov\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/CHOC.2019.140103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pindaric odes written around the time of the French Revolution have a penchant for abstractions. Apostrophized Liberty, Fortune, Virtue, and Joy, which replaced the monarch as the ode’s addressee, attest to the numinous prehistory of distinctively modern concepts that Reinhart Koselleck termed “collective singulars.” In particular, eighteenth-century Pindarics put forward representations of Liberty prevailing over an unenlightened past, which conform to the schema of victorious encounter established in Pindar’s epinician odes. The article dwells closely on two ostensibly pro-revolutionary and highly influential texts in the Pindaric mold, Alexander Radishchev’s Liberty and Friedrich Schiller’s To Joy, which share a concept of freedom that diverges from both the republican and the liberal interpretations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/CHOC.2019.140103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/CHOC.2019.140103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

写于法国大革命时期的品达尔颂歌对抽象有一种偏爱。apostrozed Liberty、Fortune、Virtue和Joy取代了君主作为颂歌的收信人，证明了莱因哈特·科塞莱克(Reinhart Koselleck)称之为“集体单数”的独特现代概念的神秘史前。特别是，18世纪的品达学派提出了自由战胜未开化的过去的表述，这与品达学派的颂歌中建立的胜利相遇的图式相符。这篇文章密切关注了两篇表面上支持革命但极具影响力的品达尔式文本，亚历山大·拉迪舍夫的《自由》和弗里德里希·席勒的《致欢乐》，这两篇文章分享了一种不同于共和主义和自由主义解释的自由概念。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Republican Liberty and the Pindaric Genealogy of Modern Abstractions

Pindaric odes written around the time of the French Revolution have a penchant for abstractions. Apostrophized Liberty, Fortune, Virtue, and Joy, which replaced the monarch as the ode’s addressee, attest to the numinous prehistory of distinctively modern concepts that Reinhart Koselleck termed “collective singulars.” In particular, eighteenth-century Pindarics put forward representations of Liberty prevailing over an unenlightened past, which conform to the schema of victorious encounter established in Pindar’s epinician odes. The article dwells closely on two ostensibly pro-revolutionary and highly influential texts in the Pindaric mold, Alexander Radishchev’s Liberty and Friedrich Schiller’s To Joy, which share a concept of freedom that diverges from both the republican and the liberal interpretations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Contributions to the History of Concepts HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Contributions to the History of Concepts is no longer published by Brill from 2010.