园艺在美国中西部植物入侵中的作用

IF 1.5 3区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
T. Culley, Tziporah Feldman
{"title":"园艺在美国中西部植物入侵中的作用","authors":"T. Culley, Tziporah Feldman","doi":"10.1086/724662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Premise of research. As the second leading cause of biodiversity loss worldwide, invasive species have been introduced accidentally or intentionally into many locations. To prevent their continued spread, identifying common pathways of introduction is critical, as Sarah Reichard emphasized in her classic 1994 study in which she analyzed 235 woody species considered invasive in the United States at that time and reported that the majority had current or historical uses in horticulture. Methodology. We now update her classic study with a literature review and expand it to herbaceous species by examining the origin of species identified as invasive today but within the Midwestern United States. Pivotal results. Of the 295 invasive species in this region, most introductions were through the ornamental trade, comprising 87.1% of trees and shrubs, 81.0% of vines, and 29.7% of terrestrial and aquatic herbs. We found that 85.5% of 83 invasive tree, shrub, and vine taxa in the Midwestern United States were associated with horticulture, compared with Reichard’s national estimate of 82% of 235 species nationwide. Conclusions. In the 29 years since Reichard’s review, the ornamental pathway continues today to be an avenue for the introduction of some plant species that later become invasive in the Midwestern United States, and, as such, the horticulture field could be effective in helping to reduce future plant invasions.","PeriodicalId":14306,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES","volume":"36 1","pages":"260 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Horticulture in Plant Invasions in the Midwestern United States\",\"authors\":\"T. Culley, Tziporah Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/724662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Premise of research. As the second leading cause of biodiversity loss worldwide, invasive species have been introduced accidentally or intentionally into many locations. To prevent their continued spread, identifying common pathways of introduction is critical, as Sarah Reichard emphasized in her classic 1994 study in which she analyzed 235 woody species considered invasive in the United States at that time and reported that the majority had current or historical uses in horticulture. Methodology. We now update her classic study with a literature review and expand it to herbaceous species by examining the origin of species identified as invasive today but within the Midwestern United States. Pivotal results. Of the 295 invasive species in this region, most introductions were through the ornamental trade, comprising 87.1% of trees and shrubs, 81.0% of vines, and 29.7% of terrestrial and aquatic herbs. We found that 85.5% of 83 invasive tree, shrub, and vine taxa in the Midwestern United States were associated with horticulture, compared with Reichard’s national estimate of 82% of 235 species nationwide. Conclusions. In the 29 years since Reichard’s review, the ornamental pathway continues today to be an avenue for the introduction of some plant species that later become invasive in the Midwestern United States, and, as such, the horticulture field could be effective in helping to reduce future plant invasions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"260 - 270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/724662\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究的前提。作为全球生物多样性丧失的第二大原因,入侵物种被无意或有意地引入许多地方。为了防止它们继续传播,确定共同的引进途径至关重要,莎拉·赖查德(Sarah Reichard)在她1994年的经典研究中强调,她分析了当时在美国被认为是入侵的235种木本物种,并报告说,其中大多数在当前或历史上都有园艺用途。方法。我们现在用文献综述来更新她的经典研究,并通过检查今天在美国中西部被确定为入侵的物种的起源,将其扩展到草本物种。关键的结果。295种外来入侵植物中,以观赏植物为主,乔灌木占87.1%,藤本植物占81.0%,陆生和水生草本植物占29.7%。我们发现,在美国中西部83种入侵树种、灌木和藤本植物分类群中,85.5%与园艺有关,而在全国235种物种中,赖查德的估计为82%。结论。在Reichard的回顾之后的29年里,观赏路径今天仍然是引入一些植物物种的途径,这些植物物种后来成为美国中西部的入侵物种,因此,园艺领域可以有效地帮助减少未来的植物入侵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Horticulture in Plant Invasions in the Midwestern United States
Premise of research. As the second leading cause of biodiversity loss worldwide, invasive species have been introduced accidentally or intentionally into many locations. To prevent their continued spread, identifying common pathways of introduction is critical, as Sarah Reichard emphasized in her classic 1994 study in which she analyzed 235 woody species considered invasive in the United States at that time and reported that the majority had current or historical uses in horticulture. Methodology. We now update her classic study with a literature review and expand it to herbaceous species by examining the origin of species identified as invasive today but within the Midwestern United States. Pivotal results. Of the 295 invasive species in this region, most introductions were through the ornamental trade, comprising 87.1% of trees and shrubs, 81.0% of vines, and 29.7% of terrestrial and aquatic herbs. We found that 85.5% of 83 invasive tree, shrub, and vine taxa in the Midwestern United States were associated with horticulture, compared with Reichard’s national estimate of 82% of 235 species nationwide. Conclusions. In the 29 years since Reichard’s review, the ornamental pathway continues today to be an avenue for the introduction of some plant species that later become invasive in the Midwestern United States, and, as such, the horticulture field could be effective in helping to reduce future plant invasions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Plant Sciences has a distinguished history of publishing research in the plant sciences since 1875. IJPS presents high quality, original, peer-reviewed research from laboratories around the world in all areas of the plant sciences. Topics covered range from genetics and genomics, developmental and cell biology, biochemistry and physiology, to morphology and anatomy, systematics, evolution, paleobotany, plant-microbe interactions, and ecology. IJPS does NOT publish papers on agriculture or crop improvement. In addition to full-length research papers, IJPS publishes review articles, including the open access Coulter Reviews, rapid communications, and perspectives. IJPS welcomes contributions that present evaluations and new perspectives on areas of current interest in plant biology. IJPS publishes nine issues per year and regularly features special issues on topics of particular interest, including new and exciting research originally presented at major botanical conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信