Jayna Niblock, G. F. Frolek Clark, Taylor Crane Vos, D. Lieberman, E. Hunter
{"title":"促进0-5岁儿童认知发展的职业治疗干预的系统综述:第二部分,环境因素导致的风险和促进认知发展","authors":"Jayna Niblock, G. F. Frolek Clark, Taylor Crane Vos, D. Lieberman, E. Hunter","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2021.1941493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aim: This article is the second part of a systematic review updates and broadens a previous systematic review (Frolek Clark & Schlabach, 2010) to examine the evidence for of interventions within the scope of occupational therapy practice to enhance cognitive and pre-academic development in young children with or without at-risk factors. This article is Part 2 of the review and will focus on interventions for children at-risk from environmental factors and interventions that promoting cognitive development in children ages birth to 5 years. Part 1 is published separately and focuses on children with specific diagnoses. Methods: A systematic search of studies published from 2010 to 2020 using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, OTseeker, and Cochrane was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised: 19 Level I, 6 Level II, and 2 Level III evidence (Part 2). Two themes are discussed within this paper (Part 2): Children At-Risk of Cognitive Delays due to Environmental Factors, and Promoting Cognitive Development. Strong strength of evidence exists for cognitive and executive functioning training programs, literacy programs, and parent interactions focused on child’s needs. Strong strength of evidence indicates explicit Tier II interventions assist preschool children in learning early literacy skills (e.g., print knowledge, letter names, letter sounds). Moderate strength of evidence supports using movement or play to enhance cognitive and executive functions in preschoolers. Conclusions: Occupational therapy practitioners working in home and preschool programs can use these evidence-based interventions to enhance cognitive development, executive functions, and pre-academic functions performance for young children with or without risk factors. Part 1 of the review also appears in this issue.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"38 1","pages":"486 - 504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Occupational Therapy Interventions to Enhance Cognitive Development in Children 0–5 Years: Part 2, At-Risk Due to Environmental Factors and Promoting Cognitive Development\",\"authors\":\"Jayna Niblock, G. F. Frolek Clark, Taylor Crane Vos, D. Lieberman, E. Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19411243.2021.1941493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Aim: This article is the second part of a systematic review updates and broadens a previous systematic review (Frolek Clark & Schlabach, 2010) to examine the evidence for of interventions within the scope of occupational therapy practice to enhance cognitive and pre-academic development in young children with or without at-risk factors. This article is Part 2 of the review and will focus on interventions for children at-risk from environmental factors and interventions that promoting cognitive development in children ages birth to 5 years. Part 1 is published separately and focuses on children with specific diagnoses. Methods: A systematic search of studies published from 2010 to 2020 using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, OTseeker, and Cochrane was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised: 19 Level I, 6 Level II, and 2 Level III evidence (Part 2). Two themes are discussed within this paper (Part 2): Children At-Risk of Cognitive Delays due to Environmental Factors, and Promoting Cognitive Development. Strong strength of evidence exists for cognitive and executive functioning training programs, literacy programs, and parent interactions focused on child’s needs. Strong strength of evidence indicates explicit Tier II interventions assist preschool children in learning early literacy skills (e.g., print knowledge, letter names, letter sounds). Moderate strength of evidence supports using movement or play to enhance cognitive and executive functions in preschoolers. Conclusions: Occupational therapy practitioners working in home and preschool programs can use these evidence-based interventions to enhance cognitive development, executive functions, and pre-academic functions performance for young children with or without risk factors. Part 1 of the review also appears in this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"486 - 504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2021.1941493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2021.1941493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要目的:本文是系统综述的第二部分,更新和扩展了之前的系统综述(Frolek Clark & Schlabach, 2010),以检查在职业治疗实践范围内的干预措施的证据,以增强有或没有风险因素的幼儿的认知和学业前发展。这篇文章是综述的第二部分,将重点关注环境因素和促进5岁儿童认知发展的干预措施。第1部分是单独出版的,重点是患有特定诊断的儿童。方法:采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对2010年至2020年在MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、ERIC、OTseeker和Cochrane上发表的研究进行系统检索。结果:27项研究符合纳入标准,并进行了严格评估:19项I级证据,6项II级证据和2项III级证据(第2部分)。本文讨论了两个主题(第2部分):环境因素导致的认知延迟风险儿童,以及促进认知发展。有强有力的证据表明,认知和执行功能培训项目、识字项目和关注儿童需求的父母互动是存在的。强有力的证据表明,明确的第二级干预措施有助于学龄前儿童学习早期识字技能(例如,印刷知识、字母名称、字母发音)。中等强度的证据支持使用运动或游戏来增强学龄前儿童的认知和执行功能。结论:在家庭和学前项目中工作的职业治疗从业者可以使用这些基于证据的干预措施来提高有或没有风险因素的幼儿的认知发展、执行功能和学前功能表现。评论的第1部分也出现在本期。
Systematic Review of Occupational Therapy Interventions to Enhance Cognitive Development in Children 0–5 Years: Part 2, At-Risk Due to Environmental Factors and Promoting Cognitive Development
ABSTRACT Aim: This article is the second part of a systematic review updates and broadens a previous systematic review (Frolek Clark & Schlabach, 2010) to examine the evidence for of interventions within the scope of occupational therapy practice to enhance cognitive and pre-academic development in young children with or without at-risk factors. This article is Part 2 of the review and will focus on interventions for children at-risk from environmental factors and interventions that promoting cognitive development in children ages birth to 5 years. Part 1 is published separately and focuses on children with specific diagnoses. Methods: A systematic search of studies published from 2010 to 2020 using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, OTseeker, and Cochrane was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised: 19 Level I, 6 Level II, and 2 Level III evidence (Part 2). Two themes are discussed within this paper (Part 2): Children At-Risk of Cognitive Delays due to Environmental Factors, and Promoting Cognitive Development. Strong strength of evidence exists for cognitive and executive functioning training programs, literacy programs, and parent interactions focused on child’s needs. Strong strength of evidence indicates explicit Tier II interventions assist preschool children in learning early literacy skills (e.g., print knowledge, letter names, letter sounds). Moderate strength of evidence supports using movement or play to enhance cognitive and executive functions in preschoolers. Conclusions: Occupational therapy practitioners working in home and preschool programs can use these evidence-based interventions to enhance cognitive development, executive functions, and pre-academic functions performance for young children with or without risk factors. Part 1 of the review also appears in this issue.