慕课前后,机构前后

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
{"title":"慕课前后,机构前后","authors":"","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-4333-7.ch006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital learning practice using ubiquitous personal technologies can lead to teachers using their craft professionalism to create artfully-crafted, student-centered, learning experiences. Supportive and progressive organisational architectures of participation reveal adaptive institutions working across collaborative networks. The question now is what might adaptive institutions look like if they have been subjected to transformational processes, rather than just “e-enabling” the traditional practice of content delivery within the existing classical subject taxonomies? MOOCs seem to be a continuation of a learning catered for content through delivery; they are not a new paradigm, despite their promotion in this way by universities and the technology companies selling their platforms. In order to look at what transformation rather than e-enabling might look like, the authors review their framing ideas with long-run historical views of education, learning, knowledge, and institutions with a process called “before and after.”","PeriodicalId":29943,"journal":{"name":"E-Learning and Digital Media","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Before and After MOOCs, Before and After Institutions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-7998-4333-7.ch006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital learning practice using ubiquitous personal technologies can lead to teachers using their craft professionalism to create artfully-crafted, student-centered, learning experiences. Supportive and progressive organisational architectures of participation reveal adaptive institutions working across collaborative networks. The question now is what might adaptive institutions look like if they have been subjected to transformational processes, rather than just “e-enabling” the traditional practice of content delivery within the existing classical subject taxonomies? MOOCs seem to be a continuation of a learning catered for content through delivery; they are not a new paradigm, despite their promotion in this way by universities and the technology companies selling their platforms. In order to look at what transformation rather than e-enabling might look like, the authors review their framing ideas with long-run historical views of education, learning, knowledge, and institutions with a process called “before and after.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":29943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"E-Learning and Digital Media\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"E-Learning and Digital Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4333-7.ch006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Learning and Digital Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4333-7.ch006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用无处不在的个人技术的数字化学习实践可以使教师利用他们的专业技能创造出精心制作的、以学生为中心的学习体验。参与的支持性和进步性组织架构揭示了跨协作网络工作的适应性机构。现在的问题是,如果适应性机构受到转型过程的影响,而不仅仅是在现有的经典主题分类法中“电子化”内容交付的传统实践,它们会是什么样子?mooc似乎是一种通过交付来满足学习内容的延续;尽管大学和销售其平台的科技公司以这种方式推广它们,但它们并不是一种新的范式。为了观察转型(而非电子赋能)可能是什么样子,作者通过一个称为“前后”的过程,从教育、学习、知识和制度的长期历史观点来回顾他们的框架思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Before and After MOOCs, Before and After Institutions
Digital learning practice using ubiquitous personal technologies can lead to teachers using their craft professionalism to create artfully-crafted, student-centered, learning experiences. Supportive and progressive organisational architectures of participation reveal adaptive institutions working across collaborative networks. The question now is what might adaptive institutions look like if they have been subjected to transformational processes, rather than just “e-enabling” the traditional practice of content delivery within the existing classical subject taxonomies? MOOCs seem to be a continuation of a learning catered for content through delivery; they are not a new paradigm, despite their promotion in this way by universities and the technology companies selling their platforms. In order to look at what transformation rather than e-enabling might look like, the authors review their framing ideas with long-run historical views of education, learning, knowledge, and institutions with a process called “before and after.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
E-Learning and Digital Media
E-Learning and Digital Media EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信