J. Paupério, Vikas Gupta, Josephine Burgin, Suran Jayathilaka, J. Lanfear, K. Abarenkov, U. Kõljalg, L. Penev, G. Cochrane
{"title":"提高eDNA和元条形码数据的公平性:欧洲核苷酸档案数据沉积的标准和工具","authors":"J. Paupério, Vikas Gupta, Josephine Burgin, Suran Jayathilaka, J. Lanfear, K. Abarenkov, U. Kõljalg, L. Penev, G. Cochrane","doi":"10.3897/biss.7.111835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advancements in sequencing technologies have promoted the generation of molecular data for cataloguing and describing biodiversity. The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) through the application of metabarcoding techniques enables comprehensive descriptions of communities and their function, being fundamental for understanding and preserving biodiversity. Metabarcoding is becoming widely used and standard methods are being generated for a growing range of applications with high scalability. The generated data can be made available in its unprocessed form, as raw data (the sequenced reads) or as interpreted data, including sets of sequences derived after bioinformatics processing (Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) or Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs)) and occurrence tables (tables that describe the occurrences and abundances of species or OTUs/ASVs). However, for this data to be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR), and therefore fully available for meaningful interpretation, it needs to be deposited in public repositories together with enriched sample metadata, protocols and analysis workflows (ten Hoopen et al. 2017). \n Metabarcoding raw data and associated sample metadata is often stored and made available through the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) archives (Arita et al. 2020), of which the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA, Burgin et al. 2022) is its European database, but it is often deposited with minimal information, which hinders data reusability. \n Within the scope of the Horizon 2020 project, Biodiversity Community Integrated Knowledge Library (BiCIKL), which is building a community of interconnected data for biodiversity research (Penev et al. 2022), we are working towards improving the standards for molecular ecology data sharing, developing tools to facilitate data deposition and retrieval, and linking between data types. \n Here we will present the ENA data model, showcasing how metabarcoding data can be shared, while providing enriched metadata, and how this data is linked with existing data in other research infrastructures in the biodiversity domain, such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), where data is deposited following the guidelines published in Abarenkov et al. (2023). We will also present the results of our recent discussions on standards for this data type and discuss future plans towards continuing to improve data sharing and interoperability for molecular ecology.","PeriodicalId":9011,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving FAIRness of eDNA and Metabarcoding Data: Standards and tools for European Nucleotide Archive data deposition\",\"authors\":\"J. Paupério, Vikas Gupta, Josephine Burgin, Suran Jayathilaka, J. Lanfear, K. Abarenkov, U. Kõljalg, L. Penev, G. Cochrane\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/biss.7.111835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The advancements in sequencing technologies have promoted the generation of molecular data for cataloguing and describing biodiversity. The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) through the application of metabarcoding techniques enables comprehensive descriptions of communities and their function, being fundamental for understanding and preserving biodiversity. Metabarcoding is becoming widely used and standard methods are being generated for a growing range of applications with high scalability. The generated data can be made available in its unprocessed form, as raw data (the sequenced reads) or as interpreted data, including sets of sequences derived after bioinformatics processing (Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) or Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs)) and occurrence tables (tables that describe the occurrences and abundances of species or OTUs/ASVs). However, for this data to be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR), and therefore fully available for meaningful interpretation, it needs to be deposited in public repositories together with enriched sample metadata, protocols and analysis workflows (ten Hoopen et al. 2017). \\n Metabarcoding raw data and associated sample metadata is often stored and made available through the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) archives (Arita et al. 2020), of which the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA, Burgin et al. 2022) is its European database, but it is often deposited with minimal information, which hinders data reusability. \\n Within the scope of the Horizon 2020 project, Biodiversity Community Integrated Knowledge Library (BiCIKL), which is building a community of interconnected data for biodiversity research (Penev et al. 2022), we are working towards improving the standards for molecular ecology data sharing, developing tools to facilitate data deposition and retrieval, and linking between data types. \\n Here we will present the ENA data model, showcasing how metabarcoding data can be shared, while providing enriched metadata, and how this data is linked with existing data in other research infrastructures in the biodiversity domain, such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), where data is deposited following the guidelines published in Abarenkov et al. (2023). We will also present the results of our recent discussions on standards for this data type and discuss future plans towards continuing to improve data sharing and interoperability for molecular ecology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.111835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.111835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
测序技术的进步促进了生物多样性分子数据编目和描述的产生。应用元条形码技术对环境DNA (eDNA)进行分析,可以全面描述群落及其功能,是了解和保护生物多样性的基础。元条形码的应用越来越广泛,并且为越来越多具有高可扩展性的应用程序生成了标准方法。生成的数据可以以未经处理的形式提供,作为原始数据(测序读数)或作为解释数据,包括经过生物信息学处理(扩增子序列变体(asv)或操作分类单位(OTUs))和发生表(描述物种或OTUs/ asv的发生和丰度的表)衍生的序列集。然而,为了使这些数据可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重用(FAIR),并因此完全可用于有意义的解释,它需要与丰富的样本元数据、协议和分析工作流一起存储在公共存储库中(ten Hoopen et al. 2017)。元条形码原始数据和相关样本元数据通常通过国际核苷酸序列数据库协作(INSDC)档案(Arita等人,2020)存储和提供,其中欧洲核苷酸档案(ENA, Burgin等人,2022)是其欧洲数据库,但它通常存储的信息很少,这阻碍了数据的可重用性。在“地平线2020”生物多样性社区综合知识图书馆(BiCIKL)项目范围内,我们正在为生物多样性研究建立一个相互关联的数据社区(Penev et al. 2022),我们正在努力改善分子生态学数据共享的标准,开发促进数据沉积和检索的工具,以及数据类型之间的链接。在这里,我们将展示ENA数据模型,展示如何共享元条形码数据,同时提供丰富的元数据,以及如何将这些数据与生物多样性领域其他研究基础设施中的现有数据相关联,例如全球生物多样性信息设施(GBIF),其中数据按照Abarenkov等人(2023)发表的指南进行存储。我们还将介绍我们最近对该数据类型标准的讨论结果,并讨论继续改进分子生态学数据共享和互操作性的未来计划。
Improving FAIRness of eDNA and Metabarcoding Data: Standards and tools for European Nucleotide Archive data deposition
The advancements in sequencing technologies have promoted the generation of molecular data for cataloguing and describing biodiversity. The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) through the application of metabarcoding techniques enables comprehensive descriptions of communities and their function, being fundamental for understanding and preserving biodiversity. Metabarcoding is becoming widely used and standard methods are being generated for a growing range of applications with high scalability. The generated data can be made available in its unprocessed form, as raw data (the sequenced reads) or as interpreted data, including sets of sequences derived after bioinformatics processing (Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) or Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs)) and occurrence tables (tables that describe the occurrences and abundances of species or OTUs/ASVs). However, for this data to be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR), and therefore fully available for meaningful interpretation, it needs to be deposited in public repositories together with enriched sample metadata, protocols and analysis workflows (ten Hoopen et al. 2017).
Metabarcoding raw data and associated sample metadata is often stored and made available through the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) archives (Arita et al. 2020), of which the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA, Burgin et al. 2022) is its European database, but it is often deposited with minimal information, which hinders data reusability.
Within the scope of the Horizon 2020 project, Biodiversity Community Integrated Knowledge Library (BiCIKL), which is building a community of interconnected data for biodiversity research (Penev et al. 2022), we are working towards improving the standards for molecular ecology data sharing, developing tools to facilitate data deposition and retrieval, and linking between data types.
Here we will present the ENA data model, showcasing how metabarcoding data can be shared, while providing enriched metadata, and how this data is linked with existing data in other research infrastructures in the biodiversity domain, such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), where data is deposited following the guidelines published in Abarenkov et al. (2023). We will also present the results of our recent discussions on standards for this data type and discuss future plans towards continuing to improve data sharing and interoperability for molecular ecology.