菲尔丁的介词:18世纪史学与小说

IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
ELH Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/elh.2023.a900598
S. Silver
{"title":"菲尔丁的介词:18世纪史学与小说","authors":"S. Silver","doi":"10.1353/elh.2023.a900598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:When Frederick the Great found \"no maxim . . but is defective in some particular Cases,\" he signaled a new interest in tracing historical events to complex systems of cause. This essay positions the midcentury British novel in that tradition. It establishes a relationship between the new historiography and a philosophy of grammar, which viewed prepositions as the sign of history. And it offers readings of Tristram Shandy and Tom Jones to locate the new historiographic preference at the level of narrative style. Relevant theorists include Reinhart Koselleck (and Laurence Sterne) on mid-century historiography, John Locke and James Harris on grammar, and Étienne Souriau and Michel Serres on the prepositional philosophy.","PeriodicalId":46490,"journal":{"name":"ELH","volume":"130 1","pages":"337 - 366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fielding's Prepositions: Eighteenth-Century Historiography and the Novel\",\"authors\":\"S. Silver\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/elh.2023.a900598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:When Frederick the Great found \\\"no maxim . . but is defective in some particular Cases,\\\" he signaled a new interest in tracing historical events to complex systems of cause. This essay positions the midcentury British novel in that tradition. It establishes a relationship between the new historiography and a philosophy of grammar, which viewed prepositions as the sign of history. And it offers readings of Tristram Shandy and Tom Jones to locate the new historiographic preference at the level of narrative style. Relevant theorists include Reinhart Koselleck (and Laurence Sterne) on mid-century historiography, John Locke and James Harris on grammar, and Étienne Souriau and Michel Serres on the prepositional philosophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELH\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"337 - 366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2023.a900598\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2023.a900598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:当腓特烈大帝发现“没有格言”时。但在某些特殊情况下是有缺陷的,”他对将历史事件追溯到复杂的原因系统产生了新的兴趣。这篇文章将本世纪中叶的英国小说置于这一传统之中。它建立了新史学与语法哲学之间的关系,将介词视为历史的标志。它还提供了对崔斯特拉姆·尚迪和汤姆·琼斯的阅读,以确定新的历史编纂偏好在叙事风格的层面上。相关理论家包括莱因哈特·科塞莱克(Reinhart Koselleck)和劳伦斯·斯特恩(Laurence Sterne)研究中世纪史学,约翰·洛克(John Locke)和詹姆斯·哈里斯(James Harris)研究语法,Étienne Souriau和米歇尔·塞雷斯(Michel Serres)研究介词哲学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fielding's Prepositions: Eighteenth-Century Historiography and the Novel
Abstract:When Frederick the Great found "no maxim . . but is defective in some particular Cases," he signaled a new interest in tracing historical events to complex systems of cause. This essay positions the midcentury British novel in that tradition. It establishes a relationship between the new historiography and a philosophy of grammar, which viewed prepositions as the sign of history. And it offers readings of Tristram Shandy and Tom Jones to locate the new historiographic preference at the level of narrative style. Relevant theorists include Reinhart Koselleck (and Laurence Sterne) on mid-century historiography, John Locke and James Harris on grammar, and Étienne Souriau and Michel Serres on the prepositional philosophy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ELH
ELH LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信