塞内加尔达喀尔弱势生活条件儿童粪便中肠道寄生虫的显微镜和实时荧光定量PCR检测

Souléye Lélo, F. Ly, A. Lam, C. Fall, Issac Manga, Fassiatou Tairou, K. Sylla, M. Ndiaye, D. Sow, R. Tine, B. Faye
{"title":"塞内加尔达喀尔弱势生活条件儿童粪便中肠道寄生虫的显微镜和实时荧光定量PCR检测","authors":"Souléye Lélo, F. Ly, A. Lam, C. Fall, Issac Manga, Fassiatou Tairou, K. Sylla, M. Ndiaye, D. Sow, R. Tine, B. Faye","doi":"10.35248/2155-9597.21.12.398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intestinal Parasitic Infections (IPIs) are considered a serious public health problem and widely distributed worldwide, mainly in urban and rural environments of tropical and subtropical countries. Globally, soil- transmitted helminths and protozoa are the most common intestinal parasites. Decreasing the prevalence of IPIs is one of the main aims of health services in these countries. This study was designed to determine the current status of IPIs in children with vulnerable living conditions by microscopy and PCR. Methodology/main findings: A cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted. One stool sample per participant (n=253) was examined by direct smear, Formal-Ether Concentration (FEC), and real-time PCR. It was found that 17.39% harboured at least one helminth while 12.64% harboured two helminths or more. Among the microscopic techniques, FEC was able to detect the broadest spectrum of parasite species. However, FEC also missed a considerable number of infections, notably S. stercoralis and G. intestinalis. PCR outperformed microscopy in terms of sensitivity and range of parasite species detected. Conclusion: It was shown that intestinal parasites, especially helminths were omnipresent in our population studies. Classical techniques such as FEC are useful for the detection of some intestinal helminth species, but they lack sensitivity for other parasite species. PCR can detect intestinal parasites more accurately but is generally not feasible in resource-poor settings, at least not in peripheral labs. Hence, there is a need for a more field-friendly, sensitive approach for on-the-spot diagnosis of parasitic infections.","PeriodicalId":15045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bacteriology & Parasitology","volume":"234 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Stool Samples by Microscopy and Real-Time PCR in Children with Vulnerable Living Conditions in Dakar, Senegal\",\"authors\":\"Souléye Lélo, F. Ly, A. Lam, C. Fall, Issac Manga, Fassiatou Tairou, K. Sylla, M. Ndiaye, D. Sow, R. Tine, B. Faye\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2155-9597.21.12.398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Intestinal Parasitic Infections (IPIs) are considered a serious public health problem and widely distributed worldwide, mainly in urban and rural environments of tropical and subtropical countries. Globally, soil- transmitted helminths and protozoa are the most common intestinal parasites. Decreasing the prevalence of IPIs is one of the main aims of health services in these countries. This study was designed to determine the current status of IPIs in children with vulnerable living conditions by microscopy and PCR. Methodology/main findings: A cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted. One stool sample per participant (n=253) was examined by direct smear, Formal-Ether Concentration (FEC), and real-time PCR. It was found that 17.39% harboured at least one helminth while 12.64% harboured two helminths or more. Among the microscopic techniques, FEC was able to detect the broadest spectrum of parasite species. However, FEC also missed a considerable number of infections, notably S. stercoralis and G. intestinalis. PCR outperformed microscopy in terms of sensitivity and range of parasite species detected. Conclusion: It was shown that intestinal parasites, especially helminths were omnipresent in our population studies. Classical techniques such as FEC are useful for the detection of some intestinal helminth species, but they lack sensitivity for other parasite species. PCR can detect intestinal parasites more accurately but is generally not feasible in resource-poor settings, at least not in peripheral labs. Hence, there is a need for a more field-friendly, sensitive approach for on-the-spot diagnosis of parasitic infections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bacteriology & Parasitology\",\"volume\":\"234 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bacteriology & Parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-9597.21.12.398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bacteriology & Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2155-9597.21.12.398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:肠道寄生虫感染被认为是一个严重的公共卫生问题,在世界范围内广泛分布,主要发生在热带和亚热带国家的城市和农村环境中。在全球范围内,土壤传播的蠕虫和原生动物是最常见的肠道寄生虫。减少ipi的流行是这些国家卫生服务的主要目标之一。本研究旨在通过显微镜和PCR方法确定生活条件脆弱的儿童ipi的现状。方法/主要发现:进行了一项以人口为基础的横断面调查。通过直接涂片、甲醛乙醚浓度(FEC)和实时PCR检测每位参与者的一份粪便样本(n=253)。结果发现,17.39%的蚊虫孳生至少1只虫,12.64%的蚊虫孳生2只及以上虫。在显微镜技术中,FEC能够检测到最广泛的寄生虫种类。然而,FEC也遗漏了相当数量的感染,特别是S. stercoralis和G. testinalis。在检测到的寄生虫种类的敏感性和范围方面,PCR优于显微镜。结论:肠道寄生虫,尤其是寄生虫在我国种群研究中普遍存在。FEC等传统技术对某些肠道寄生虫种类的检测是有用的,但对其他寄生虫种类缺乏敏感性。PCR可以更准确地检测肠道寄生虫,但在资源贫乏的环境中通常是不可行的,至少在外围实验室是不可行的。因此,需要一种对现场更友好、更敏感的方法来现场诊断寄生虫感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Stool Samples by Microscopy and Real-Time PCR in Children with Vulnerable Living Conditions in Dakar, Senegal
Background: Intestinal Parasitic Infections (IPIs) are considered a serious public health problem and widely distributed worldwide, mainly in urban and rural environments of tropical and subtropical countries. Globally, soil- transmitted helminths and protozoa are the most common intestinal parasites. Decreasing the prevalence of IPIs is one of the main aims of health services in these countries. This study was designed to determine the current status of IPIs in children with vulnerable living conditions by microscopy and PCR. Methodology/main findings: A cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted. One stool sample per participant (n=253) was examined by direct smear, Formal-Ether Concentration (FEC), and real-time PCR. It was found that 17.39% harboured at least one helminth while 12.64% harboured two helminths or more. Among the microscopic techniques, FEC was able to detect the broadest spectrum of parasite species. However, FEC also missed a considerable number of infections, notably S. stercoralis and G. intestinalis. PCR outperformed microscopy in terms of sensitivity and range of parasite species detected. Conclusion: It was shown that intestinal parasites, especially helminths were omnipresent in our population studies. Classical techniques such as FEC are useful for the detection of some intestinal helminth species, but they lack sensitivity for other parasite species. PCR can detect intestinal parasites more accurately but is generally not feasible in resource-poor settings, at least not in peripheral labs. Hence, there is a need for a more field-friendly, sensitive approach for on-the-spot diagnosis of parasitic infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信