在数字化API 17O文档上使用需求管理工具的好处

Rey Climacosa, Sierra Foster Matlock, Joveline Anne Ollero, D. Miller
{"title":"在数字化API 17O文档上使用需求管理工具的好处","authors":"Rey Climacosa, Sierra Foster Matlock, Joveline Anne Ollero, D. Miller","doi":"10.4043/31024-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Currently oil and gas companies are spending billions of dollars on digitalization efforts. One important aspect of a project that needs to be digitized are requirements. Most oil and gas companies receive project documentation and requirements as PDF files. Receiving PDF documents make it very difficult for companies to manipulate the content to identify which parts of the document are requirements and which parts are just background information. In addition, documents that contain requirements have poorly written requirements that are ambiguous, and can have many interpretations, making it difficult to show compliance. To solve the issues caused by poorly written requirements and receiving PDF files instead of receiving requirements in a more usable format, the solution is to rewrite the requirements and use a requirements management (RM) tool to put the requirements in a database. The American Petroleum Institute (API) 17O 2nd Edition document and a representative list of High Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS) product requirements are used to show the benefits of using a requirements management tool. This paper will describe the prerequisites prior to selecting an RM tool, show how using a requirements quality analyzer tool can aid in preparing requirements to be imported into an RM tool, demonstrate the main benefits of using an RM tool in a project context, and discuss lessons learned from adding an RM tool to a document-based project.","PeriodicalId":10936,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 17, 2021","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of Using Requirements Management Tools on a Digitized API 17O Document\",\"authors\":\"Rey Climacosa, Sierra Foster Matlock, Joveline Anne Ollero, D. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/31024-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Currently oil and gas companies are spending billions of dollars on digitalization efforts. One important aspect of a project that needs to be digitized are requirements. Most oil and gas companies receive project documentation and requirements as PDF files. Receiving PDF documents make it very difficult for companies to manipulate the content to identify which parts of the document are requirements and which parts are just background information. In addition, documents that contain requirements have poorly written requirements that are ambiguous, and can have many interpretations, making it difficult to show compliance. To solve the issues caused by poorly written requirements and receiving PDF files instead of receiving requirements in a more usable format, the solution is to rewrite the requirements and use a requirements management (RM) tool to put the requirements in a database. The American Petroleum Institute (API) 17O 2nd Edition document and a representative list of High Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS) product requirements are used to show the benefits of using a requirements management tool. This paper will describe the prerequisites prior to selecting an RM tool, show how using a requirements quality analyzer tool can aid in preparing requirements to be imported into an RM tool, demonstrate the main benefits of using an RM tool in a project context, and discuss lessons learned from adding an RM tool to a document-based project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 17, 2021\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, August 17, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/31024-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 17, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31024-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,石油和天然气公司在数字化方面投入了数十亿美元。项目需要数字化的一个重要方面是需求。大多数石油和天然气公司都以PDF文件的形式接收项目文档和需求。接收PDF文档使公司很难操作文档的内容,以确定文档的哪些部分是需求,哪些部分只是背景信息。此外,包含需求的文档编写得很差,这些需求是模糊的,并且可能有许多解释,使得难以显示遵从性。为了解决由于需求写得不好和接收PDF文件而不是接收更可用的格式的需求而引起的问题,解决方案是重写需求并使用需求管理(RM)工具将需求放入数据库中。美国石油协会(API) 17O第2版文件和高完整性压力保护系统(HIPPS)产品要求的代表性列表用于展示使用需求管理工具的好处。本文将描述选择RM工具之前的先决条件,展示如何使用需求质量分析工具帮助准备将需求导入到RM工具中,演示在项目上下文中使用RM工具的主要好处,并讨论从将RM工具添加到基于文档的项目中获得的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits of Using Requirements Management Tools on a Digitized API 17O Document
Currently oil and gas companies are spending billions of dollars on digitalization efforts. One important aspect of a project that needs to be digitized are requirements. Most oil and gas companies receive project documentation and requirements as PDF files. Receiving PDF documents make it very difficult for companies to manipulate the content to identify which parts of the document are requirements and which parts are just background information. In addition, documents that contain requirements have poorly written requirements that are ambiguous, and can have many interpretations, making it difficult to show compliance. To solve the issues caused by poorly written requirements and receiving PDF files instead of receiving requirements in a more usable format, the solution is to rewrite the requirements and use a requirements management (RM) tool to put the requirements in a database. The American Petroleum Institute (API) 17O 2nd Edition document and a representative list of High Integrity Pressure Protection System (HIPPS) product requirements are used to show the benefits of using a requirements management tool. This paper will describe the prerequisites prior to selecting an RM tool, show how using a requirements quality analyzer tool can aid in preparing requirements to be imported into an RM tool, demonstrate the main benefits of using an RM tool in a project context, and discuss lessons learned from adding an RM tool to a document-based project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信