“你没有被命令抚摸它,而是在它附近祈祷”:早期伊斯兰朝圣中关于触摸的争论

Adam Bursi
{"title":"“你没有被命令抚摸它,而是在它附近祈祷”:早期伊斯兰朝圣中关于触摸的争论","authors":"Adam Bursi","doi":"10.1080/17458927.2021.2020604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Early Islamic texts record a series of ongoing debates about a fundamental component of ritual performance: the act of touch. During the hajj, Muslim pilgrims participated in intensively haptic devotional activity in the holy city of Mecca, where they thronged to grasp objects and places associated with Islamic history and worship. Such rituals were carried out, and approved of, by many early Muslims, who considered these as important acts in the performance of Islamic identity. Yet in narrative histories and juristic discussions about the appropriate ways of interacting with and “sensing” pilgrimage places, many Muslim voices note the perceivably idolatrous connotations of touching objects and spaces. They often associate such haptic encounters with religiously marginalized others, including pagans, women, and sectarian groups. Bringing these sources into conversation with scholarship on ritual constructions of religious identity – and on the role therein of the senses – this article highlights the disputed role of touch in demarcating correctly Islamic pilgrimage practices, and thus the contested place of touch in the emergent Islamic sensorium.","PeriodicalId":75188,"journal":{"name":"The senses and society","volume":"38 1","pages":"8 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“You were not commanded to stroke it, but to pray nearby it”: debating touch within early Islamic pilgrimage\",\"authors\":\"Adam Bursi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17458927.2021.2020604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Early Islamic texts record a series of ongoing debates about a fundamental component of ritual performance: the act of touch. During the hajj, Muslim pilgrims participated in intensively haptic devotional activity in the holy city of Mecca, where they thronged to grasp objects and places associated with Islamic history and worship. Such rituals were carried out, and approved of, by many early Muslims, who considered these as important acts in the performance of Islamic identity. Yet in narrative histories and juristic discussions about the appropriate ways of interacting with and “sensing” pilgrimage places, many Muslim voices note the perceivably idolatrous connotations of touching objects and spaces. They often associate such haptic encounters with religiously marginalized others, including pagans, women, and sectarian groups. Bringing these sources into conversation with scholarship on ritual constructions of religious identity – and on the role therein of the senses – this article highlights the disputed role of touch in demarcating correctly Islamic pilgrimage practices, and thus the contested place of touch in the emergent Islamic sensorium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The senses and society\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"8 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The senses and society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2021.2020604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The senses and society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2021.2020604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

早期伊斯兰文本记录了一系列关于仪式表演的基本组成部分:触摸行为的持续争论。在朝觐期间,穆斯林朝圣者在圣城麦加参加了密集的触觉祈祷活动,他们聚集在那里抓住与伊斯兰历史和礼拜有关的物品和场所。这些仪式是由许多早期的穆斯林进行并认可的,他们认为这些是表现伊斯兰身份的重要行为。然而,在关于与朝圣地点互动和“感知”的适当方式的叙事历史和法律讨论中,许多穆斯林的声音注意到触摸物体和空间的可感知的偶像崇拜内涵。他们经常将这种触觉接触与宗教边缘化的其他人联系在一起,包括异教徒、妇女和宗派团体。将这些来源与宗教身份的仪式结构以及感官在其中的作用的学术讨论结合起来,本文强调了触摸在正确划分伊斯兰朝圣实践中的有争议的作用,从而强调了触摸在新兴的伊斯兰感官中有争议的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“You were not commanded to stroke it, but to pray nearby it”: debating touch within early Islamic pilgrimage
ABSTRACT Early Islamic texts record a series of ongoing debates about a fundamental component of ritual performance: the act of touch. During the hajj, Muslim pilgrims participated in intensively haptic devotional activity in the holy city of Mecca, where they thronged to grasp objects and places associated with Islamic history and worship. Such rituals were carried out, and approved of, by many early Muslims, who considered these as important acts in the performance of Islamic identity. Yet in narrative histories and juristic discussions about the appropriate ways of interacting with and “sensing” pilgrimage places, many Muslim voices note the perceivably idolatrous connotations of touching objects and spaces. They often associate such haptic encounters with religiously marginalized others, including pagans, women, and sectarian groups. Bringing these sources into conversation with scholarship on ritual constructions of religious identity – and on the role therein of the senses – this article highlights the disputed role of touch in demarcating correctly Islamic pilgrimage practices, and thus the contested place of touch in the emergent Islamic sensorium.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信