基于贝叶斯推理的地下公用事业坑结构评价

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
H. Wijaya, P. Rajeev, R. Kalfat, E. Gad, K. Abdouka
{"title":"基于贝叶斯推理的地下公用事业坑结构评价","authors":"H. Wijaya, P. Rajeev, R. Kalfat, E. Gad, K. Abdouka","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2022.2091092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ageing infrastructure is becoming an increasing challenge as a result of deterioration and greater loading demands. Modern cities were built on top of complex underground infrastructure networks many of which are still in-service beyond their design life. The safety assessment of underground structures is of utmost importance to avoid catastrophic failures and develop cost-effective renewal and rehabilitation strategies. However, the lack of design documentation and absence of data on the level of structural deterioration make determination of current structural capacity a challenge. This paper presents a probabilistic based assessment framework for underground utility service pits using Bayesian updating technique, which is used to refine the probabilistic distribution of material properties from the prior distribution constructed using published data. A case study of an underground pit located in Central Melbourne is provided. Extensive experimental testing was conducted to characterise the material properties and a full-scale masonry wall was tested to understand the failure mode due to earth pressure and traffic load. The test data was used in strength prediction models to achieve a more accurate estimate for wall capacity. Further, the strength degradation models were integrated to develop the time-dependent material models, which were eventually used to compute reliability index.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural assessment of underground utility services pit using Bayesian inference\",\"authors\":\"H. Wijaya, P. Rajeev, R. Kalfat, E. Gad, K. Abdouka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2022.2091092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Ageing infrastructure is becoming an increasing challenge as a result of deterioration and greater loading demands. Modern cities were built on top of complex underground infrastructure networks many of which are still in-service beyond their design life. The safety assessment of underground structures is of utmost importance to avoid catastrophic failures and develop cost-effective renewal and rehabilitation strategies. However, the lack of design documentation and absence of data on the level of structural deterioration make determination of current structural capacity a challenge. This paper presents a probabilistic based assessment framework for underground utility service pits using Bayesian updating technique, which is used to refine the probabilistic distribution of material properties from the prior distribution constructed using published data. A case study of an underground pit located in Central Melbourne is provided. Extensive experimental testing was conducted to characterise the material properties and a full-scale masonry wall was tested to understand the failure mode due to earth pressure and traffic load. The test data was used in strength prediction models to achieve a more accurate estimate for wall capacity. Further, the strength degradation models were integrated to develop the time-dependent material models, which were eventually used to compute reliability index.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2091092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2091092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于老化和更大的负荷需求,老化的基础设施正成为越来越大的挑战。现代城市建立在复杂的地下基础设施网络之上,其中许多仍在使用超过其设计寿命。地下结构的安全评估对于避免灾难性破坏和制定具有成本效益的更新和修复策略至关重要。然而,由于缺乏设计文件和结构恶化程度的数据,确定当前的结构能力是一个挑战。利用贝叶斯更新技术,提出了一种基于概率的地下公用事业服务坑评估框架,该框架利用公开数据构造的先验分布来细化材料属性的概率分布。提供了一个位于墨尔本市中心的地下坑的案例研究。进行了大量的试验测试以表征材料特性,并对全尺寸砌体墙进行了测试,以了解土压力和交通荷载导致的破坏模式。试验数据用于强度预测模型,以获得更准确的墙体承载力估算。进一步,将强度退化模型集成到材料的时间依赖模型中,并最终用于可靠性指标的计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural assessment of underground utility services pit using Bayesian inference
ABSTRACT Ageing infrastructure is becoming an increasing challenge as a result of deterioration and greater loading demands. Modern cities were built on top of complex underground infrastructure networks many of which are still in-service beyond their design life. The safety assessment of underground structures is of utmost importance to avoid catastrophic failures and develop cost-effective renewal and rehabilitation strategies. However, the lack of design documentation and absence of data on the level of structural deterioration make determination of current structural capacity a challenge. This paper presents a probabilistic based assessment framework for underground utility service pits using Bayesian updating technique, which is used to refine the probabilistic distribution of material properties from the prior distribution constructed using published data. A case study of an underground pit located in Central Melbourne is provided. Extensive experimental testing was conducted to characterise the material properties and a full-scale masonry wall was tested to understand the failure mode due to earth pressure and traffic load. The test data was used in strength prediction models to achieve a more accurate estimate for wall capacity. Further, the strength degradation models were integrated to develop the time-dependent material models, which were eventually used to compute reliability index.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信