保护消费者法律,作为租赁协议的成功持有者(研究PT. Federal Finance Group)

Tangges Dines, Kusbianto Kusbianto, Ayu Trisna Dewi
{"title":"保护消费者法律,作为租赁协议的成功持有者(研究PT. Federal Finance Group)","authors":"Tangges Dines, Kusbianto Kusbianto, Ayu Trisna Dewi","doi":"10.46576/lj.v3i1.2293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTLeasing is often used as a god of help or a god of savior for most Indonesian people. However, at this time the existence of leasing that violates the law on the forced withdrawal of goods that are the object of leasing is very disturbing to consumers.The problems in this study are the position of the leasing consumer in the event of a default in the leasing agreement, the dispute resolution process due to default against the leasing company at PT FIF GROUP. and implementation of confiscation of goods (Objek Leasing) at PT FIF GROUP. This research method uses empirical legal research and descriptive analytical research.If the customer has exceeded the promised time limit, the customer will get (bad RO) and the customer will also be blacklisted from the company and will not be able to apply for credit withdrawal at any leasing company or dealer he wants to take credit for. If the customer makes payments smoothly and there are no obstacles, the customer will have a good position. Settlement of disputes in leasing contracts can be done in two ways, namely through court and out of court. Implementation of the trial based on court decisions or the decision of the Constitutional Court no. 18/PUU-XVII-2019 there has been no confiscation by PT. FIF. Determination of court confiscation to withdraw the object of leasing as determined by the Constitutional Court (MK). It is suggested that PT FEDERAL INTERNATIONAL FINANCE should use more government regulations, namely using court decisions or decisions of the Constitutional Court to confiscate or take goods (leasing objects).Keywords: Leasing, Achievement Wan, Confiscation of Goods","PeriodicalId":33353,"journal":{"name":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN SEBAGAI PEMEGANG LEASING YANG WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN LEASING (Studi Pada PT. Federal International Finance Group)\",\"authors\":\"Tangges Dines, Kusbianto Kusbianto, Ayu Trisna Dewi\",\"doi\":\"10.46576/lj.v3i1.2293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTLeasing is often used as a god of help or a god of savior for most Indonesian people. However, at this time the existence of leasing that violates the law on the forced withdrawal of goods that are the object of leasing is very disturbing to consumers.The problems in this study are the position of the leasing consumer in the event of a default in the leasing agreement, the dispute resolution process due to default against the leasing company at PT FIF GROUP. and implementation of confiscation of goods (Objek Leasing) at PT FIF GROUP. This research method uses empirical legal research and descriptive analytical research.If the customer has exceeded the promised time limit, the customer will get (bad RO) and the customer will also be blacklisted from the company and will not be able to apply for credit withdrawal at any leasing company or dealer he wants to take credit for. If the customer makes payments smoothly and there are no obstacles, the customer will have a good position. Settlement of disputes in leasing contracts can be done in two ways, namely through court and out of court. Implementation of the trial based on court decisions or the decision of the Constitutional Court no. 18/PUU-XVII-2019 there has been no confiscation by PT. FIF. Determination of court confiscation to withdraw the object of leasing as determined by the Constitutional Court (MK). It is suggested that PT FEDERAL INTERNATIONAL FINANCE should use more government regulations, namely using court decisions or decisions of the Constitutional Court to confiscate or take goods (leasing objects).Keywords: Leasing, Achievement Wan, Confiscation of Goods\",\"PeriodicalId\":33353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v3i1.2293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v3i1.2293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】对大多数印尼人来说,租赁是一种救星或救星。然而,在这个时候,租赁的存在,违反法律上的强制撤回货物,是租赁的对象,是非常令人不安的消费者。本研究的问题是租赁消费者在租赁协议违约时的立场,PT FIF GROUP因租赁公司违约而引发的争议解决过程。以及在PT FIF集团实施没收货物(object Leasing)的措施。本研究方法采用实证法学研究和描述性分析研究相结合的研究方法。如果客户超过了承诺的时间限制,客户将得到(坏RO),客户也将被公司列入黑名单,并且不能在任何他想要赊账的租赁公司或经销商处申请信贷提取。如果客户付款顺利,没有障碍,客户就会有一个很好的位置。租赁合同纠纷的解决可以通过法院和庭外两种方式进行。根据法院判决或宪法法院判决实施审判的情况。18/PUU-XVII-2019没有被PT. FIF没收。根据宪法法院(MK)的决定,撤销租赁对象的法院没收决定。建议PT FEDERAL INTERNATIONAL FINANCE应该更多地使用政府法规,即使用法院判决或宪法法院的判决来没收或拿走货物(租赁对象)。关键词:租赁,成就万,没收物品
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN SEBAGAI PEMEGANG LEASING YANG WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN LEASING (Studi Pada PT. Federal International Finance Group)
ABSTRACTLeasing is often used as a god of help or a god of savior for most Indonesian people. However, at this time the existence of leasing that violates the law on the forced withdrawal of goods that are the object of leasing is very disturbing to consumers.The problems in this study are the position of the leasing consumer in the event of a default in the leasing agreement, the dispute resolution process due to default against the leasing company at PT FIF GROUP. and implementation of confiscation of goods (Objek Leasing) at PT FIF GROUP. This research method uses empirical legal research and descriptive analytical research.If the customer has exceeded the promised time limit, the customer will get (bad RO) and the customer will also be blacklisted from the company and will not be able to apply for credit withdrawal at any leasing company or dealer he wants to take credit for. If the customer makes payments smoothly and there are no obstacles, the customer will have a good position. Settlement of disputes in leasing contracts can be done in two ways, namely through court and out of court. Implementation of the trial based on court decisions or the decision of the Constitutional Court no. 18/PUU-XVII-2019 there has been no confiscation by PT. FIF. Determination of court confiscation to withdraw the object of leasing as determined by the Constitutional Court (MK). It is suggested that PT FEDERAL INTERNATIONAL FINANCE should use more government regulations, namely using court decisions or decisions of the Constitutional Court to confiscate or take goods (leasing objects).Keywords: Leasing, Achievement Wan, Confiscation of Goods
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信