21厘米宇宙学的高斯过程前景减法和功率谱估计

N. Kern, Adrian Liu
{"title":"21厘米宇宙学的高斯过程前景减法和功率谱估计","authors":"N. Kern, Adrian Liu","doi":"10.1093/mnras/staa3736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the primary challenges in enabling the scientific potential of 21 cm intensity mapping at the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) is the separation of astrophysical foreground contamination. Recent works have claimed that Gaussian process regression (GPR) can robustly perform this separation, particularly at low Fourier $k$ wavenumbers where the signal reaches its peak signal-to-noise ratio. We revisit this topic by casting GPR foreground subtraction (GPR-FS) into the quadratic estimator formalism, thereby putting its statistical properties on stronger theoretical footing. We find that GPR-FS can distort the window functions at these low k modes, which, without proper decorrelation, make it difficult to probe the EoR power spectrum. Incidentally, we also show that GPR-FS is in fact closely related to the widely studied optimal quadratic estimator. As a case study, we look at recent power spectrum upper limits from the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) that utilized GPR-FS. We pay close attention to their normalization scheme, showing that it is particularly sensitive to signal loss when the EoR covariance is misestimated. This implies possible ramifications for recent astrophysical interpretations of the LOFAR limits, because many of the EoR models ruled out do not fall within the bounds of the covariance models explored by LOFAR. Being more robust to this bias (although not entirely free of it), we conclude that the quadratic estimator is a more natural framework for implementing GPR-FS and computing the 21 cm power spectrum.","PeriodicalId":8431,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaussian process foreground subtraction and power spectrum estimation for 21 cm cosmology\",\"authors\":\"N. Kern, Adrian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mnras/staa3736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the primary challenges in enabling the scientific potential of 21 cm intensity mapping at the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) is the separation of astrophysical foreground contamination. Recent works have claimed that Gaussian process regression (GPR) can robustly perform this separation, particularly at low Fourier $k$ wavenumbers where the signal reaches its peak signal-to-noise ratio. We revisit this topic by casting GPR foreground subtraction (GPR-FS) into the quadratic estimator formalism, thereby putting its statistical properties on stronger theoretical footing. We find that GPR-FS can distort the window functions at these low k modes, which, without proper decorrelation, make it difficult to probe the EoR power spectrum. Incidentally, we also show that GPR-FS is in fact closely related to the widely studied optimal quadratic estimator. As a case study, we look at recent power spectrum upper limits from the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) that utilized GPR-FS. We pay close attention to their normalization scheme, showing that it is particularly sensitive to signal loss when the EoR covariance is misestimated. This implies possible ramifications for recent astrophysical interpretations of the LOFAR limits, because many of the EoR models ruled out do not fall within the bounds of the covariance models explored by LOFAR. Being more robust to this bias (although not entirely free of it), we conclude that the quadratic estimator is a more natural framework for implementing GPR-FS and computing the 21 cm power spectrum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在再电离时代(EoR)实现21厘米强度测绘的科学潜力的主要挑战之一是分离天体物理前景污染。最近的研究声称高斯过程回归(GPR)可以稳健地执行这种分离,特别是在信号达到峰值信噪比的低傅立叶k波数时。我们通过将GPR前景减法(GPR- fs)转换为二次估计量形式来重新审视这个主题,从而使其统计特性具有更强的理论基础。我们发现GPR-FS会扭曲这些低k模式下的窗口函数,如果没有适当的去相关,就会给探测提高采收率功率谱带来困难。顺便说一下,我们还表明GPR-FS实际上与广泛研究的最优二次估计量密切相关。作为案例研究,我们研究了利用GPR-FS的低频阵列(LOFAR)最近的功率谱上限。我们密切关注它们的归一化方案,表明当EoR协方差被错误估计时,它对信号损失特别敏感。这意味着最近对LOFAR极限的天体物理解释可能会产生影响,因为许多被排除的EoR模型并不在LOFAR探索的协方差模型的范围内。由于对这种偏差的鲁棒性更强(尽管不是完全没有),我们得出结论,二次估计器是实现GPR-FS和计算21 cm功率谱的更自然的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gaussian process foreground subtraction and power spectrum estimation for 21 cm cosmology
One of the primary challenges in enabling the scientific potential of 21 cm intensity mapping at the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) is the separation of astrophysical foreground contamination. Recent works have claimed that Gaussian process regression (GPR) can robustly perform this separation, particularly at low Fourier $k$ wavenumbers where the signal reaches its peak signal-to-noise ratio. We revisit this topic by casting GPR foreground subtraction (GPR-FS) into the quadratic estimator formalism, thereby putting its statistical properties on stronger theoretical footing. We find that GPR-FS can distort the window functions at these low k modes, which, without proper decorrelation, make it difficult to probe the EoR power spectrum. Incidentally, we also show that GPR-FS is in fact closely related to the widely studied optimal quadratic estimator. As a case study, we look at recent power spectrum upper limits from the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) that utilized GPR-FS. We pay close attention to their normalization scheme, showing that it is particularly sensitive to signal loss when the EoR covariance is misestimated. This implies possible ramifications for recent astrophysical interpretations of the LOFAR limits, because many of the EoR models ruled out do not fall within the bounds of the covariance models explored by LOFAR. Being more robust to this bias (although not entirely free of it), we conclude that the quadratic estimator is a more natural framework for implementing GPR-FS and computing the 21 cm power spectrum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信