农民对其他保护政策的接受程度

Peter F. Korsching, Peter J. Nowak
{"title":"农民对其他保护政策的接受程度","authors":"Peter F. Korsching,&nbsp;Peter J. Nowak","doi":"10.1016/0304-1131(87)90002-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil conservation policy and the resultant programs of soil conservation may be viewed as efforts of planned change. A major reason for the failure of conservation programs is the assumptions or criteria upon which conservation policy is based that limit the amount of flexibility for application of programs to unusual or unanticipated situations. The assumptions relate to (1) the economic rationality of men, (2) the homogeneous distribution of knowledge and information across a population of farmers, and (3) the indivualism of the farmer in his decision-making and action. These assumptions have serious implications upon a farmer's capacity to implement and maintain conservation practices.</p><p>The relationship between existing and proposed soil conservation policies and the structure of agriculture are examined, with consideration of these assumptions and the capacity for change. Data on farmer preferences for alternative conservation policies are then examined to determine differential effect by farm structure. Results indicate a definite relationship between farm structure, capacity for change and policy preference.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100064,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Environment","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-1131(87)90002-6","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farmer acceptance of alternative conservation policies\",\"authors\":\"Peter F. Korsching,&nbsp;Peter J. Nowak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0304-1131(87)90002-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil conservation policy and the resultant programs of soil conservation may be viewed as efforts of planned change. A major reason for the failure of conservation programs is the assumptions or criteria upon which conservation policy is based that limit the amount of flexibility for application of programs to unusual or unanticipated situations. The assumptions relate to (1) the economic rationality of men, (2) the homogeneous distribution of knowledge and information across a population of farmers, and (3) the indivualism of the farmer in his decision-making and action. These assumptions have serious implications upon a farmer's capacity to implement and maintain conservation practices.</p><p>The relationship between existing and proposed soil conservation policies and the structure of agriculture are examined, with consideration of these assumptions and the capacity for change. Data on farmer preferences for alternative conservation policies are then examined to determine differential effect by farm structure. Results indicate a definite relationship between farm structure, capacity for change and policy preference.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture and Environment\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-1131(87)90002-6\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304113187900026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304113187900026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

土壤保持政策和由此产生的土壤保持方案可以看作是有计划的改变的努力。保护计划失败的一个主要原因是保护政策所依据的假设或标准限制了计划在不寻常或意外情况下应用的灵活性。这些假设涉及(1)男性的经济理性,(2)知识和信息在农民群体中的均匀分布,以及(3)农民在决策和行动中的个人主义。这些假设对农民实施和维持保护措施的能力有严重影响。考虑到这些假设和变化的能力,审查了现有和拟议的土壤保持政策与农业结构之间的关系。然后检查农民对替代保护政策的偏好数据,以确定农场结构的差异效应。结果表明,农业结构、变化能力与政策偏好之间存在一定的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Farmer acceptance of alternative conservation policies

Soil conservation policy and the resultant programs of soil conservation may be viewed as efforts of planned change. A major reason for the failure of conservation programs is the assumptions or criteria upon which conservation policy is based that limit the amount of flexibility for application of programs to unusual or unanticipated situations. The assumptions relate to (1) the economic rationality of men, (2) the homogeneous distribution of knowledge and information across a population of farmers, and (3) the indivualism of the farmer in his decision-making and action. These assumptions have serious implications upon a farmer's capacity to implement and maintain conservation practices.

The relationship between existing and proposed soil conservation policies and the structure of agriculture are examined, with consideration of these assumptions and the capacity for change. Data on farmer preferences for alternative conservation policies are then examined to determine differential effect by farm structure. Results indicate a definite relationship between farm structure, capacity for change and policy preference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信