试验方法类型和试样尺寸对木町砂岩I型断裂韧性的影响

M. Kataoka, Y. Obara, Leona Vavro, K. Souček, Sang-Ho Cho, Sang-Sun Jeong
{"title":"试验方法类型和试样尺寸对木町砂岩I型断裂韧性的影响","authors":"M. Kataoka, Y. Obara, Leona Vavro, K. Souček, Sang-Ho Cho, Sang-Sun Jeong","doi":"10.2473/JOURNALOFMMIJ.135.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several testing methods have been proposed for evaluating the mode I fracture toughness of rocks. Since the fracture toughness evaluated from the different testing methods is generally not compared, what is still not well-known is the effect of the testing method type on the fracture toughness. The effect of not only the testing method type but also the specimen size exists in the fracture toughness of rock materials. To clarify the effect of the testing method type and specimen size on the fracture toughness, many fracture toughness tests were performed in the previous experimental studies. However, the effect has not been elucidated because the number of the specimens is limited and the range of the specimen size is relatively small in the previous works. In this paper, firstly, three types of the fracture toughness test, the chevron bend (CB) test, semi-circular bend (SCB) test and straight notched disk bending (SNDB) test, were performed using Kimachi sandstone. Then, the SCB test was carried out using the same sandstone with various specimen sizes. As a result, the fracture toughness obtained from the CB and SCB tests were compatible each other. However, the SNDB tests estimated lower value of the fracture toughness than the others. From the results of the SCB tests with various specimen sizes, the fracture toughness increased with increasing radius. Based on the results, the effect of the specimen size on the fracture toughness and the differences of the fracture toughness obtained from the three testing methods were discussed.","PeriodicalId":16502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mmij","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Testing Method Type and Specimen Size on Mode I Fracture Toughness of Kimachi Sandstone\",\"authors\":\"M. Kataoka, Y. Obara, Leona Vavro, K. Souček, Sang-Ho Cho, Sang-Sun Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.2473/JOURNALOFMMIJ.135.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several testing methods have been proposed for evaluating the mode I fracture toughness of rocks. Since the fracture toughness evaluated from the different testing methods is generally not compared, what is still not well-known is the effect of the testing method type on the fracture toughness. The effect of not only the testing method type but also the specimen size exists in the fracture toughness of rock materials. To clarify the effect of the testing method type and specimen size on the fracture toughness, many fracture toughness tests were performed in the previous experimental studies. However, the effect has not been elucidated because the number of the specimens is limited and the range of the specimen size is relatively small in the previous works. In this paper, firstly, three types of the fracture toughness test, the chevron bend (CB) test, semi-circular bend (SCB) test and straight notched disk bending (SNDB) test, were performed using Kimachi sandstone. Then, the SCB test was carried out using the same sandstone with various specimen sizes. As a result, the fracture toughness obtained from the CB and SCB tests were compatible each other. However, the SNDB tests estimated lower value of the fracture toughness than the others. From the results of the SCB tests with various specimen sizes, the fracture toughness increased with increasing radius. Based on the results, the effect of the specimen size on the fracture toughness and the differences of the fracture toughness obtained from the three testing methods were discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mmij\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mmij\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2473/JOURNALOFMMIJ.135.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mmij","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2473/JOURNALOFMMIJ.135.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

提出了几种评价岩石I型断裂韧性的测试方法。由于一般不比较不同测试方法评估的断裂韧性,所以测试方法类型对断裂韧性的影响尚不清楚。岩石材料的断裂韧性不仅受试验方法类型的影响,而且受试样尺寸的影响。为了明确试验方法类型和试样尺寸对断裂韧性的影响,在以往的实验研究中进行了大量的断裂韧性试验。但在以往的研究中,由于试样数量有限,且试样尺寸范围较小,其影响尚未得到阐明。本文首先对木町砂岩进行了三种类型的断裂韧性试验,即v形弯曲(CB)试验、半圆弯曲(SCB)试验和直缺口盘弯曲(SNDB)试验。然后,使用相同的砂岩进行不同试样尺寸的SCB试验。结果表明,CB和SCB试验获得的断裂韧性基本一致。然而,SNDB测试估计的断裂韧性值低于其他测试。从不同试样尺寸的SCB试验结果来看,断裂韧性随半径的增大而增大。在此基础上,讨论了试样尺寸对断裂韧性的影响以及三种测试方法所得断裂韧性的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Testing Method Type and Specimen Size on Mode I Fracture Toughness of Kimachi Sandstone
Several testing methods have been proposed for evaluating the mode I fracture toughness of rocks. Since the fracture toughness evaluated from the different testing methods is generally not compared, what is still not well-known is the effect of the testing method type on the fracture toughness. The effect of not only the testing method type but also the specimen size exists in the fracture toughness of rock materials. To clarify the effect of the testing method type and specimen size on the fracture toughness, many fracture toughness tests were performed in the previous experimental studies. However, the effect has not been elucidated because the number of the specimens is limited and the range of the specimen size is relatively small in the previous works. In this paper, firstly, three types of the fracture toughness test, the chevron bend (CB) test, semi-circular bend (SCB) test and straight notched disk bending (SNDB) test, were performed using Kimachi sandstone. Then, the SCB test was carried out using the same sandstone with various specimen sizes. As a result, the fracture toughness obtained from the CB and SCB tests were compatible each other. However, the SNDB tests estimated lower value of the fracture toughness than the others. From the results of the SCB tests with various specimen sizes, the fracture toughness increased with increasing radius. Based on the results, the effect of the specimen size on the fracture toughness and the differences of the fracture toughness obtained from the three testing methods were discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信