为什么我们不应该把学术界的性别差异归咎于女性:动物学中的女性视角

Pub Date : 2021-02-26 DOI:10.3897/ZOOLOGIA.38.E61968

V. Slobodian, Karla D. A. Soares, R. Falaschi, L. Prado, P. Camelier, T. Guedes, L. C. Leal, A. Hsiou, Glaucia Del-Rio, Eliza R. Costa, Karla Raphaella Costa Pereira, A. B. D’Angiolella, Shirliane de A. Sousa, L. Diele-Viegas

{"title":"为什么我们不应该把学术界的性别差异归咎于女性:动物学中的女性视角","authors":"V. Slobodian, Karla D. A. Soares, R. Falaschi, L. Prado, P. Camelier, T. Guedes, L. C. Leal, A. Hsiou, Glaucia Del-Rio, Eliza R. Costa, Karla Raphaella Costa Pereira, A. B. D’Angiolella, Shirliane de A. Sousa, L. Diele-Viegas","doi":"10.3897/ZOOLOGIA.38.E61968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why we shouldn’t blame women for gender disparity in academia: perspectives of women in zoology\",\"authors\":\"V. Slobodian, Karla D. A. Soares, R. Falaschi, L. Prado, P. Camelier, T. Guedes, L. C. Leal, A. Hsiou, Glaucia Del-Rio, Eliza R. Costa, Karla Raphaella Costa Pereira, A. B. D’Angiolella, Shirliane de A. Sousa, L. Diele-Viegas\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/ZOOLOGIA.38.E61968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/ZOOLOGIA.38.E61968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ZOOLOGIA.38.E61968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

以下这封信来自一个女性动物学家网络，是对AlShebli等人(2020)的文章的回复，该文章表明，女性protsamgsams在男性的指导下获得更多收益，并得出结论，女性导师阻碍了女性protsamgsams的成功及其影响的质量。这一贡献有两个部分。首先，我们强调了最相关的方法缺陷，在我们看来，这些缺陷可能影响了AlShebli等人(2020)的结论。其次，我们讨论了与科学中的女性有关的问题，带来了女性在动物学中的视角，并讨论了当前的多样性政策如何积极地改变了我们的领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

Why we shouldn’t blame women for gender disparity in academia: perspectives of women in zoology

The following letter, from a network of women zoologists, is a reply to the article of AlShebli et al. (2020), which suggests that female protégés reap more benefits when mentored by men and concludes that female mentors hinder the success of their female protégés and the quality of their impact. This contribution has two parts. First, we highlight the most relevant methodological flaws which, in our opinion, may have impacted the conclusions of AlShebli et al. (2020). Second, we discuss issues pertaining to women in science, bring a perspective of Women in Zoology and discuss how current diversity policies are positively changing our field.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助