欧盟法律中的“公民”和“外国人”。移民法及其世界主义观

D. Thym
{"title":"欧盟法律中的“公民”和“外国人”。移民法及其世界主义观","authors":"D. Thym","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Migration has become a controversial subject across Europe and beyond. At the same time, the EU has built up an impressive set of rules for third-country nationals over the past two decades, which—unlike the mobility of EU citizens—received comparatively little attention apart from immigration and asylum specialists. This contribution presents the constitutional framework for ‘migration law’ towards third-country nationals and shows in how far they depart from the paradigm of intra-European mobility. It will be argued that differences can be rationalised by divergent objectives and do, nonetheless, not present a move towards ‘fortress Europe’. EU migration law maintains the distinction between citizens and foreigners at the same time as it protects migrants, including refugees. By accommodating migrants' rights and self-government, EU migration law can be construed as an endeavour to replace traditional notions of alienage with constitutional rules with a cosmopolitan outlook.","PeriodicalId":81320,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown immigration law journal","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Citizens’ and ‘Foreigners’ in EU Law. Migration Law and its Cosmopolitan Outlook\",\"authors\":\"D. Thym\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eulj.12164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Migration has become a controversial subject across Europe and beyond. At the same time, the EU has built up an impressive set of rules for third-country nationals over the past two decades, which—unlike the mobility of EU citizens—received comparatively little attention apart from immigration and asylum specialists. This contribution presents the constitutional framework for ‘migration law’ towards third-country nationals and shows in how far they depart from the paradigm of intra-European mobility. It will be argued that differences can be rationalised by divergent objectives and do, nonetheless, not present a move towards ‘fortress Europe’. EU migration law maintains the distinction between citizens and foreigners at the same time as it protects migrants, including refugees. By accommodating migrants' rights and self-government, EU migration law can be construed as an endeavour to replace traditional notions of alienage with constitutional rules with a cosmopolitan outlook.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown immigration law journal\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown immigration law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown immigration law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

移民问题在欧洲乃至世界各地都已成为一个有争议的话题。与此同时,在过去的二十年里,欧盟已经为第三国国民建立了一套令人印象深刻的规则,这与欧盟公民的流动性不同,除了移民和庇护专家之外,这些规则相对较少受到关注。这一贡献提出了针对第三国国民的“移民法”的宪法框架,并表明他们离欧洲内部流动的范式有多远。有人会认为,不同的目标可以使差异合理化,尽管如此,这并不意味着要走向“堡垒欧洲”。欧盟移民法在保护包括难民在内的移民的同时,保留了公民和外国人之间的区别。通过包容移民的权利和自治,欧盟移民法可以被解释为用具有世界视野的宪法规则取代传统的移民观念的一种努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Citizens’ and ‘Foreigners’ in EU Law. Migration Law and its Cosmopolitan Outlook
Migration has become a controversial subject across Europe and beyond. At the same time, the EU has built up an impressive set of rules for third-country nationals over the past two decades, which—unlike the mobility of EU citizens—received comparatively little attention apart from immigration and asylum specialists. This contribution presents the constitutional framework for ‘migration law’ towards third-country nationals and shows in how far they depart from the paradigm of intra-European mobility. It will be argued that differences can be rationalised by divergent objectives and do, nonetheless, not present a move towards ‘fortress Europe’. EU migration law maintains the distinction between citizens and foreigners at the same time as it protects migrants, including refugees. By accommodating migrants' rights and self-government, EU migration law can be construed as an endeavour to replace traditional notions of alienage with constitutional rules with a cosmopolitan outlook.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信