两种自腐蚀树脂对人牙髓反应的组织病理学评价

N. Çobanoğlu, F. Ozer, M. Demirci, O. Ozdemir, S. Imazato
{"title":"两种自腐蚀树脂对人牙髓反应的组织病理学评价","authors":"N. Çobanoğlu, F. Ozer, M. Demirci, O. Ozdemir, S. Imazato","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.150013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the human pulp response following the application of two proprietary self-etch adhesive systems (Clearfil Protect Bond and Clearfil SE Bond). Materials and Methods: Deep Class V cavities were prepared on the teeth scheduled to be extracted. Cavities were covered with a composite resin (Clearfil APX) following the application of the bonding agents. The teeth were extracted after 7 or 90 days and prepared for histological investigation. The pulp response was categorized. Two cavities were restored with calcium hydroxide used as the control in the 7-day period. The data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann-Whitney U tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Inflammatory cell infiltration was not shown in most of the teeth. No significant statistical difference concerning all the histological evaluation criteria was observed among the groups of adhesive systems or between the control group and the groups of adhesive systems. (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both bonding systems were found biologically compatible with pulp tissues in non-exposed cavities.","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"257 1","pages":"1 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histopathological evaluation of human pulp response to two self-etching resins\",\"authors\":\"N. Çobanoğlu, F. Ozer, M. Demirci, O. Ozdemir, S. Imazato\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2321-4619.150013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the human pulp response following the application of two proprietary self-etch adhesive systems (Clearfil Protect Bond and Clearfil SE Bond). Materials and Methods: Deep Class V cavities were prepared on the teeth scheduled to be extracted. Cavities were covered with a composite resin (Clearfil APX) following the application of the bonding agents. The teeth were extracted after 7 or 90 days and prepared for histological investigation. The pulp response was categorized. Two cavities were restored with calcium hydroxide used as the control in the 7-day period. The data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann-Whitney U tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Inflammatory cell infiltration was not shown in most of the teeth. No significant statistical difference concerning all the histological evaluation criteria was observed among the groups of adhesive systems or between the control group and the groups of adhesive systems. (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both bonding systems were found biologically compatible with pulp tissues in non-exposed cavities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"257 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.150013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.150013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估两种专有的自蚀刻粘合剂系统(Clearfil Protect Bond和Clearfil SE Bond)应用后的人类牙本质反应。材料与方法:在拟拔除的牙齿上制备深V类空腔。在应用粘合剂后,用复合树脂(Clearfil APX)覆盖空腔。术后7天或90天拔牙,进行组织学观察。对牙髓反应进行分类。以氢氧化钙为对照,在7 d内修复2个空腔。数据进行双向方差分析(ANOVA)、Mann-Whitney U检验和Wilcoxon sign -rank检验。结果:大部分牙齿未见炎症细胞浸润。胶粘剂系统组间、对照组与胶粘剂系统组间各项组织学评价指标均无统计学差异。(p < 0.05)。结论:两种粘结系统均与牙髓组织具有良好的生物相容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Histopathological evaluation of human pulp response to two self-etching resins
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the human pulp response following the application of two proprietary self-etch adhesive systems (Clearfil Protect Bond and Clearfil SE Bond). Materials and Methods: Deep Class V cavities were prepared on the teeth scheduled to be extracted. Cavities were covered with a composite resin (Clearfil APX) following the application of the bonding agents. The teeth were extracted after 7 or 90 days and prepared for histological investigation. The pulp response was categorized. Two cavities were restored with calcium hydroxide used as the control in the 7-day period. The data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann-Whitney U tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Inflammatory cell infiltration was not shown in most of the teeth. No significant statistical difference concerning all the histological evaluation criteria was observed among the groups of adhesive systems or between the control group and the groups of adhesive systems. (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both bonding systems were found biologically compatible with pulp tissues in non-exposed cavities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信